Publications

Found 125 recordsSort by Active filters:
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2019. Metaphor as Dynamical–Ecological Performance. Metaphor and Symbol 34 (1) : 33–44.
Gunnarsson, Tina. 2019. Multilingual students’ use of their linguistic repertoires while writing in L2 English. Lingua 224 : 35–40.
Yu, Ning and Jie Huang. 2019. Primary Metaphors across Languages: Difficulty as Weight and Solidity. Metaphor and Symbol 34 (2) : 111–126.
Pilnick, Alison, Joseph C. Webb and Jennifer Clegg. 2018. Imagined Constructed Thought: How Staff Interpret the Behavior of Patients with Intellectual Disabilities. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (4) : 347–362.
Pilnick, Alison, Joseph C. Webb and Jennifer Clegg. 2018. Imagined Constructed Thought: How Staff Interpret the Behavior of Patients with Intellectual Disabilities. Research on Language & Social Interaction 51 (4) : 347–362.
Han, Zhaohong and Eun Yong Kang. 2018. Revisiting the Cognition Hypothesis: Bridging a gap between the conceptual and the empirical. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (3) : 391–405.
McCarthy, Tanya M. 2018. Exploring Inner Speech as a Psycho-educational Resource for Language Learning Advisors. Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 159–187.
Park, Innhwa. 2018. Reported thought as (hypothetical) assessment. Journal of Pragmatics 129 : 1–12.
Proyer, René T. 2018. Playfulness and humor in psychology: An overview and update. Humor 31 (2) : 259–272.
Roush, Daniel R., ed. 2018. Event Structure Metaphors through the Body. Translation from English to American Sign Language. (Figurative Thought and Language 4). John Benjamins.
Amfo, Nana Aba Appiah, Ekua Essumanma Houphouet, Eugene K. Dordoye and Rachel Thompson. 2018. “Insanity is from home”. The expression of mental health challenges in Akan. International Journal of Language and Culture 5 (1) : 1–28.
Athanasiadou, Angeliki, ed. 2017. Studies in Figurative Thought and Language. (Human Cognitive Processing 56). John Benjamins.
Hepdinçler, Tolga, Defne Karaosmanoğlu and Eleni Varmazi. 2016. Ambiguous storytelling in three texts: unsettling the perception of reality. Text & Talk 36 (5).
Quadflieg, Susanne, Israr Ul-Haq and Nikolaos Mavridis. 2016. Now you feel it, now you don’t. How observing human-robot interactions and human-human interactions can make you feel eerie. Interaction Studies 17 (2) : 211–247.
Wessel-Tolvig, Bjørn and Patrizia Paggio. 2016. Revisiting the thinking-for-speaking hypothesis: Speech and gesture representation of motion in Danish and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 99 : 39–61.
Molder, Hedwig F.M. te and Wytske Versteeg. 2016. What my body tells me about your experience: ‘My side’ empathy formulations in ADHD coaching sessions. Journal of Pragmatics 105 : 74–86.
Snow, Don. 2015. English teaching, intercultural competence, and critical incident exercises. Language and Intercultural Communication 15 (2) : 285–299.
Ventis, W. Larry. 2015. Thinking fast and slow in the experience of humor. Humor 28 (3) : 351–373.
Boers, Frank, June Eyckmans and Julie Deconinck. 2014. Looking for form-meaning motivation in new L2 words: A think-aloud study among proficient learners of English. English Text Construction 6 (2) : 249–280.
Tversky, Barbara and Angela Kessell. 2014. Thinking in action. Pragmatics & Cognition 22 (2) : 206–223.
Kim, Mary Shin. 2014. Reported Thought as a Stance-Taking Device in Korean Conversation. Discourse Processes 51 (3) : 230–263.
Pálinkás, István. 2014. Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1) : 64–98.
Sztencel, Magdalena. 2014. Conditionality in individual minds: An argument for a wholly pragmatic approach to utterance interpretation. Lingua 152 : 81–97.
Shi, Xiaowei. 2013. Cognitive Responses in Advice Planning: An Examination of Thought Content and Its Impact on Message Features Under High Versus Low Effortful Thinking Modes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32 (3) : 311–334.
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2013. Constructing a proposal as a thought: A way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace interaction. Pragmatics 23 (3) : 519–544.