Publications

Found 38 recordsSort by Active filters:
Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2019. Problematizing information-seeking Wh-questions. Language & Communication 64 : 81–90.
Hermas, Abdelkader. 2018. Discourse-linking in advanced L3 English: Testing the Interface Hypothesis. Lingua 212 : 20–29.
Prévost, Philippe, Laurice Tuller, Marie Anne Barthez, Joëlle Malvy and Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhaut. 2017. Production and comprehension of French wh-questions by children with autism spectrum disorder: A comparative study with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 38 (5) : 1095–1131.
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio, Paolo Roseano, Ana Ma. Fernández Planas, Wendy Elvira-García and Ramon Cerda Masso. 2015. La entonación de las preguntas parciales en catalán. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 28 (2) : 511–554.
Yuan, Boping. 2015. The effect of computational complexity on L1 transfer: Evidence from L2 Chinese attitude-bearing wh-questions. Lingua 167 : 1–18.
Yoshida, Tomoyuki. 2012. Wh-questions and informativeness. Lingua 122 (14) : 1596–1612.
Bird, Christy. 2011. Formulaic jokes in interaction: The prosody of riddle openings. Pragmatics & Cognition 19 (2) : 268–290.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Barbara A. Fox. 2010. Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1) : 133–156.
Lee, Jin-Hwa. 2010. A Subject–Object Asymmetry in the Comprehension of wh-Questions by Korean Learners of English. Applied Linguistics 31 (1) : 136–155.
Monzoni, Chiara Maria. 2008. Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of 'pre-sequences'? Discourse Studies 10 (1) : 73–87.
Stoyanova, Marina. 2008. Unique Focus. Languages without multiple wh-questions. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 123). John Benjamins.
Vöge, Monika and Maria M. Egbert. 2008. Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond: German warum (why) and wieso (why) and English why. Discourse Studies 10 (1) : 17–36.
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2007. Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean Wh-interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (9) : 1570–1590.
Herriman, Jennifer. 2004. Identifying relations: The semantic functions of wh-clefts in English. Text 24 (4) : 447–469.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2004. Choice Functions and Scope of Existential Polarity Wh-Phrases in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (4) : 451–491.
Koshik, Irene. 2003. Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5 (1) : 51–78.
Mazeland, Herm Johannes. 1992. Vraag/antwoord-sequenties.
Mazeland, Harrie. 1991. Pragmatische aspecten van het gebruik van voornaamwoorden in vraagwoordvragen. TTT 10 (1) : 1–22.
Graesser, Arthur C. and Stanley P. Franklin. 1990. QUEST: A cognitive model of question answering. Discourse Processes 13 (3) : 279–303.
Meibauer, Jörg. 1990. Existenzimplikaturen bei rhetorischen W-Fragen. Sprache und Pragmatik. Arbeidberichte. Lund. 19 : 27–45.
Reis, Marga. 1990. Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik von Echo-w-Fragen.
Rosengren, Inger. 1990. W-Interrogativsatz, Skopus und Fokus. Sprache und Pragmatik. Arbeidberichte. Lund. 16 : 29–71.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1989. A case study in language socialization: Korean wh-questions. Discourse Processes 12 (2) : 169–191.
Reis, Marga and Inger Rosengren. 1988. Wh-Imperatives?!
Parisi, Domenico and Donatella Ferrante. 1987. Generating understandable explanatory sentences. In Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B. Perceptual factors and word order in event descriptions. In : 441–451. : 55–62.