Publications

Found 66 recordsSort by Active filters:
Winter, Bodo and Lucien Brown. 2019. Multimodal indexicality in Korean: “doing deference” and “performing intimacy” through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Politeness Research 15 (1) : 25–54.
Chan, Leo Tak-hung. 2018. The dialect(ic)s of control and resistance: intralingual audiovisual translation in Chinese TV drama. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2018 (251) : 89–110.
García Luque, Francisca and Mercedes Enríquez-Aranda. 2018. The reception of subtitled films from a sociological perspective. An empirical case study. Babel 64 (3) : 464–489.
Medjesky, Christopher A. and Matthew R. Meier. 2018. The Office was asking for it: “that’s what she said” as a joke cycle that perpetuates rape culture. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 15 (1) : 2–17.
Holy-Luczaj, Magdalena and Kamil Luczaj. 2017. Those who help us understand our favourite global TV series in a local language. Qualitative meta-analysis of research on local fansub groups. Babel 63 (2) : 153–173.
Tabacaru, Sabina. 2017. When language bites. A corpus-based taxonomy of sarcastic utterances in American television series. Pragmatics & Cognition 24 (2) : 186–211.
Dynel, Marta. 2016. Killing Two Birds with One Deceit. Deception in Multi-Party Interactions. International Review of Pragmatics 8 (2) : 179–218.
Eriksson, Göran. 2016. Humour, ridicule and the de-legitimization of the working class in Swedish Reality Television. Journal of Language and Politics 15 (3) : 304–321.
Messerli, Thomas C. 2016. Extradiegetic and character laughter as markers of humorous intentions in the sitcom 2 Broke Girls. Journal of Pragmatics 95 : 79–92.
Bednarek, Monika A. 2015. “Wicked” women in contemporary pop culture: “bad” language and gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie, and Saving Grace. Text & Talk 35 (4) : 431–451.
Schwind, Kai Hanno. 2015. Like Watching a Motorway Crash: Exploring the Embarrassment Humor of The Office. Humor 28 (1) : 49–70.
Simons, Nele. 2015. TV drama as a social experience: An empirical investigation of the social dimensions of watching TV drama in the age of non-linear television. Communications 40 (2).
Antony, Mary Grace. 2013. “Thank You for Calling:” Accents and Authenticity on NBC’s Outsourced. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 42 (2) : 192–213.
Brown, Lucien. 2013. “Mind your own esteemed business”: Sarcastic honorifics use and impoliteness in Korean TV dramas. Journal of Politeness Research 9 (2) : 159–186.
Dynel, Marta, ed. 2013. Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory. (Topics in Humor Research 1). John Benjamins.
Goebel, Zane. 2013. Competence to comprehend and knowledging. Language & Communication 33 (4) : 366–375.
Sandu, Roxana. 2013. Su(m)imasen and Gomen nasai: Beyond apologetic functions in Japanese. Pragmatics 23 (4) : 743–767.
Bednarek, Monika A. 2012. “Get us the hell out of here“: Key words and trigrams in fictional television series. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (1) : 35–63.
Gal-Ezer, Miri. 2012. Arab Labor's alternative vision: the ‘liberal bargain’ in the welfare state of Israel. Language and Intercultural Communication 12 (2) : 146–166.
García Gómez, Antonio. 2012. Perceptions of assertiveness among women: Triggering and managing conflict in reality television. Discourse & Communication 6 (4) : 379–399.
Tsiplakou, Stavroula. 2012. Stylizing stylization: The case of Aigia Fuxia. Multilingua 31 (2) : 277–299.
Bednarek, Monika A. 2011. The language of fictional television: A case study of the 'dramedy' Gilmore Girls. English Text Construction 4 (1) : 54–84.
Dynel, Marta. 2011. “I’ll be there for you!” On participation-based sitcom humour. In Dynel, Marta, ed. The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. John Benjamins. pp. 311–344.
Goebel, Zane. 2011. Talking about mediated representations: exploring ideologies and meanings. Text & Talk 31 (3) : 293–314.
Khan, Sarah and Mahmoud Eid. 2011. A New-Look for Muslim Women in the Canadian Media: CBC's Little Mosque on the Prairie. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 4 (2) : 184–202.