Publications

Found 161 recordsSort by Active filters:
Aldridge-Waddon, Michelle. 2019. Police delivery of the opt-out procedure for children’s court evidence: evidence of inadequate language awareness. Language Awareness 28 (3) : 166–185.
Carter, Liz. 2019. Preference organization in PRC criminal trial interaction. Defendant resistance and enforced compliance. Chinese Language and Discourse 10 (2) : 224–240.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2019. Person reference, identity, and linguistic violence in capital trials. Journal of Pragmatics 142 : 90–104.
Seuren, Lucas M. 2019. Questioning in court: The construction of direct examinations. Discourse Studies 21 (3) : 340–357.
Wang, Hong and Yunfeng Ge. 2019. Understanding the discourse of Chinese civil trials: The perspective of Critical Genre Analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 152 : 1–12.
Aronsson, Karin. 2018. Negative interrogatives and adversarial uptake: Building hostility in child custody examinations. Journal of Pragmatics 136 : 39–53.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2018. Investigating audience orientation in courtroom communication. The case of the closing argument. Pragmatics and Society 9 (4) : 545–570.
Grainger, Karen. 2018. “We’re not in a club now”: a neo-Brown and Levinson approach to analyzing courtroom data. Journal of Politeness Research 14 (1) : 19–38.
Ng, Eva N.S. 2018. Common Law in an Uncommon Courtroom. Judicial interpreting in Hong Kong. (Benjamins Translation Library 144). John Benjamins.
Pease, Jennifer Cheung and Adam Pease. 2018. Formal ontology for discourse analysis of a corpus of court interpreting. Babel 64 (4) : 594–618.
Capelotti, João Paulo. 2016. Defending laughter: an account of Brazilian court cases involving humor, 1997–2014. Humor 29 (1) : 25–48.
Jeffries, Lesley. 2016. “When did you decide to tell the truth?” Negotiating truth in rape trials before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4 (2) : 151–177.
Slobe, Tyanna. 2016. Creepy-ass cracker in post-racial America: Don West’s examination of Rachel Jeantel in the George Zimmerman murder trial. Text & Talk 36 (5) : 613–656.
Statham, Simon. 2016. Redefining Trial by Media. Towards a critical-forensic linguistic interface. (Discourse approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 67). John Benjamins.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2015. Communicating with silent addressees: Engagement features in legal opening statements. Language & Communication 43 : 35–46.
Closs Traugott, Elisabeth. 2015. “Ah, pox o’ your Pad-lock”: Interjections in the Old Bailey Corpus 1720–1913. Journal of Pragmatics 86 : 68–73.
Carter, Elisabeth. 2014. Forensic linguistics. In Östman, Jan-Ola and Jef Verschueren, eds. Handbook of Pragmatics. 2014 Installment. (Handbook of Pragmatics 18). John Benjamins. pp. 01–20.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2014. Dramatic monologues: The grammaticalization of speaking roles in courtroom opening statements. Pragmatics 24 (4) : 757–783.
D’hondt, Sigurd. 2014. Defending through disaffiliation: The vicissitudes of alignment and footing in Belgian criminal hearings. Language & Communication 36 : 68–82.
Gallez, Emmanuelle and Katrijn Maryns. 2014. Orality and authenticity in an interpreter-mediated defendant’s examination: A case study from the Belgian Assize Court. Interpreting 16 (1) : 49–80.
Ingrids, Henrik. 2014. Blame–account sequences in child custody disputes. Discourse & Society 25 (1) : 47–64.
Johnson, Alison J. 2014. ‘Dr Shipman told you that…’ The organising and synthesising power of quotation in judicial summing-up. Language & Communication 36 : 53–67.
Licoppe, Christian. 2014. Two modes of referring to the case file in the courtroom: The use of indirect reported text and text-as-addressed speech in case summaries. Language & Communication 36 : 83–96.
Makoni, Busi. 2014. Feminizing linguistic human rights: use of isihlonipho sabafazi in the courtroom and intra-group linguistic differences. Journal of multicultural discourses 9 (1) : 27–43.
Ponterotto, Diane. 2014. The risks of uncertainty: Hedging strategies in rape trial discourse. Language and Dialogue 4 (1) : 93–111.