Publications
Lam, Phoenix W.Y. 2013. Interdiscursivity, hypertextuality, multimodality: A corpus-based multimodal move analysis of Internet group buying deals. Journal of Pragmatics 51 (1) : 13–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana. 2013. The power of inversion. Irony, from utterance to discourse. In Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega, eds. Irony and Humor. From pragmatics to discourse. John Benjamins. pp. 17–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Baym, Geoffrey. 2007. Crafting New Communicative Models in the Televisual Sphere: Political Interviews on The Daily Show. The Communication Review 10 (2) : 93–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Fischer, Roswitha. 2007. Critical creativity: A study of 'politically correct' terms in style guides for different types of discourse. In Munat, Judith, ed. Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts. (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58). John Benjamins. pp. 263–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sadler, Mitsumi. 2007. Grammar in Use across Time and Space: Deconstructing the Japanese ‘dative subject’ construction. (Studies in Discourse and Grammar 20). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Warren, Martin and Winnie Cheng. 2005. //CAN i help you //: The use of rise and rise-fall tones in the Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10 (1) : 85–107. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wee, Lionel. 2005. Class-inclusion and correspondence models as discourse types: A framework for approaching metaphorical discourse. Language in Society 34 (2) : 219–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Dorgeloh, Heidrun. 2004. Conjunction in sentence and discourse: sentence-initial and discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (10) : 1761–1779. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Davies, Julia. 2003. Expressions of gender: an analysis of pupils' gendered discourse styles in small group classroom discussions. Discourse & Society 14 (2) : 115–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Korning Zethsen, K. and Inger Askehave. 2003. Communication barriers in public discourse: The patient package insert. Document Design 4 (1) : 22–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. The Importance of Discourse Types in Grammaticalization: The case of anon. In Herring, Susan C., P. Van Reenen and Lene Schøsler, eds. Textual Parameters in Older Languages. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195). John Benjamins. pp. 139. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Lehnert, Wendy G. 1997. Information Extraction: What Have We Learned? Discourse Processes 23 (3) : 441–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Leška, Oldřich, Peter Sgall, Zdena Skoumalová and Eva Hajičová, eds. 1996. Prague Linguistic Circle Papers. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague nouvelle série. Volume 2. (Prague Linguistic Circle Papers / Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague N.S.). John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Long, Debra L. 1994. The effects of pragmatics and discourse style on recognition memory for sentences. Discourse Processes 17 (2) : 213–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)