Publications

Found 13 recordsSort by Active filters:
Burford, James. 2017. Not writing, and giving ‘zero-f**ks’ about it: queer(y)ing doctoral ‘failure’. Discourse 38 (4) : 473–484.
Bitchener, John. 2016. The content feedback practices of Applied Linguistics doctoral supervisors in New Zealand and Australian universities. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 105–121.
Hyland, Fiona. 2016. Challenges faced by second language doctoral student writers in Hong Kong and their writing strategies. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 158–180.
Kumar, Vijay and Elke Stracke. 2016. Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of language use in supervisory written feedback practices – because “feedback is hard to have”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 122–138.
Mochizuki, Naoko. 2016. Oral interactions in a writing group as mediating artefacts. The case of a multilingual international PhD student’s motives, scaffolding, and response. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 181–200.
Morton, Jeanne, Celia Thompson and Neomy Storch. 2016. Becoming an applied linguist. A study of authorial voice in international PhD students’ confirmation reports. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 39 (2) : 139–157.
Al-Ali, Mohammed N. 2010. Generic patterns and socio-cultural resources in acknowledgements accompanying Arabic Ph.D. dissertations. Pragmatics 20 (1) : 1–26.
Chiang, Shiao-Yun. 2009. Personal power and positional power in a power-full 'I': a discourse analysis of doctoral dissertation supervision. Discourse & Communication 3 (3) : 255–271.
Soler-Monreal, Carmen, Luz Gil-Salom and María Carbonell-Olivares. 2009. The schematic structure of Spanish PhD thesis introductions. Spanish in Context 6 (2) : 151–175.
Starfield, Sue and L.J. Ravelli. 2008. Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing. Information Design Journal 16 (1) : 133–147.
Kogler-Hill, Susan E., David J. Atkin, Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Paul D. Skalski and Richard M. Perloff. 2007. The View from the Ivory Tower: Evaluating Doctoral Programs in Communication. Communication Reports 20 (1) : 24–41.
Sunderland, Jane. 2004. Why These Data?: Rationales for Data Selection in Doctoral Student Presentations. Language & Education 18 (5) : 435–455.
Grimshaw, Allen D. 1982. Comprehensive discourse analysis: An instance of professional peer interaction. Language in Society 11 (1) : 15–47.