Publications
Merchant, Jason. 2015. On ineffable predicates: Bilingual Greek–English code-switching under ellipsis. Lingua 166 (B) : 199–213.
Ong, Kenneth Keng Wee. 2011. Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats. Discourse Studies 13 (2) : 211–234.
Harnish, Robert. 2009. The problem of fragments: Two interpretative strategies. Pragmatics & Cognition 17 (2) : 251–282.
Lee, Hanjung. 2007. Case ellipsis at the grammar/pragmatics interface: A formal analysis from a typological perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (9) : 1465–1481.
Ginzburg, Jonathan and Robin Cooper. 2004. Clarification, Ellipsis, and the Nature of Contextual Updates in Dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (3) : 297–365.
Nariyama, Shigeko. 2003. Ellipsis and Reference Tracking in Japanese. (Studies in Language Companion Series 66). John Benjamins.
Wilson, Peter. 2003. Ellipsis. In Östman, Jan-Ola, Jef Verschueren, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen, eds. Handbook of Pragmatics. 2001 Installment. John Benjamins.
Takagi, Tomoyo. 2002. Contextual resources for inferring unexpressed referents in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 12 (2) : 153–182.
Takano, Shoji. 1998. A quantitative study of gender differences in the ellipsis of the Japanese postpositional particles -wa and -ga : Gender composition as a constraint on variability. Language Variation and Change 10 (3) : 289–323.
Pulman, Stephen G. 1997. Higher order unification and the interpretation of focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (1) : 73–115.
Shieber, Stuart M., Fernando C.N. Pereira and Mary Dalrymple. 1996. Interactions of scope and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (4) : 527–552.
Stainton, Robert J. 1995. Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (3) : 281–296.
Lobeck, Anne. 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31 (5) : 777–811.
Garnham, Alan. 1987. Effects of antecedent distance and intervening text structure in the interpretation of ellipses. Language and Speech 30 (1) : 59–69.