Publications
Aldunate, Nerea, Vladimir López, Carlos Cornejo, Cristobal Moenne-Loccoz and David Carre. 2019. Analytical and Holistic Approaches Influence the Semantic Integration: Evidence from the N400 Effect. Revista Signos: Estudios de Linguistica 52 (100) : 217–241.
Alkodimi, Khaled. 2019. New Perspectives In The Israel-Palestine Conflict: Righting The Wrong Through Metaphor In Mornings In Jenin. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature 8 (6) : 132–138.
Altohami, Waheed Mohammed. 2019. The Game-Based Metaphorical Representations Of The Arab Spring Revolutions In Journalistic Political Discourse. Studies About Languages 35 : 70–88.
Amado, Adriana. 2019. As metáforas do jornalismo: identidades implícitas para uma profissão mutante. Revista Lumina 13 (2) : 11–23.
Atkins, Scott, Ashley Mote and Kristal Alexander. 2019. No Sympathy For The Bully: A Metaphor Analysis Of Two Speeches On The Topic Of Immigration. Metaphor and the Social World 10 (1) : 1–21.
Bakhtiar, Mohsen. 2019. A cognitive linguistic view of control mechanism in Iranian culture: The case of effat ‘chastity’ in Persian. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17 (2) : 465–496.
Baltodano Román, Gabriel and Grethel Ramírez Villalobos. 2019. Norma Política y Enfermedad en Patria o Muerte, de Alberto Barrera Tyszka . Letras 65 : 39–59.
Belkhir, S. 2019. Animal-related concepts across languages and cultures from a cognitive linguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6 (2) : 295–324.
Bentein, Klaas. 2019. Dimensions of social meaning in Post-classical Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 19 (2) : 119–167.
Bilstrup Finsen, Andreas , Gerard J. Steen and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2019. An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (3) : 317–335.
Biorci, Grazia. 2019. Le metafore nella letteratura italiana della migrazione: Studi e riflessioni. In : 89–95.
Boubakri, A. and F. Boukbakri. 2019. Metaphtonymy in the naming procedure of technological devices among South Tunisian old people. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6 (2) : 271–294.