Publications
Publication details [#9549]
Dubslaff, Friedel and Bodil Martinsen. 2005. Exploring untrained interpreters’ use of direct versus indirect speech. In Pöchhacker, Franz and Miriam Shlesinger, eds. Healthcare interpreting: discourse and interaction. Special issue of Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 7 (2): 211–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Publication type
Article in Special issue
Publication language
English
Keywords
Source language
Target language
Journal DOI
10.1075/intp
Abstract
This study examines the interrelations between the use of direct vs. Indirect speech by primary participants and by dialogue interpreters by focusing on pronoun shifts and their interactional functions. The data consist of four simulated interpreter-mediated medical interviews based on the same scripted role play. The subjects were untrained Arabic interpreters working for a Danish agency. Two of the four interpreters favoured the direct style of interpreting. The other two favoured the indirect style. The findings show that all four interpreters tended to identify with the patient by personalizing the indefinite pronoun one when relaying from doctor to patient. All other pronoun shifts occurred in connection with interactional problems caused almost exclusively by the interpreters’ lack of knowledge about medical terminology — even though the terms used were in fact non-specialized ones.
Source : Based on abstract in journal