John E. JosephAddendum to “The Distributed Invention Of Enunciation Theory”

Addendum to “The distributed invention of enunciation theory”

John E. JosephUniversity of Edinburgh

A significant appearance of the term enunciation in work by Vilém Mathesius (1882–1946), a founding member of the Prague Linguistic Circle, is not mentioned in Joseph (2025), which aims to widen the received history of enunciation theory. ‘Enunciation’ is the counterpart to ‘theme’ in Mathesius’s (1929) functional sentence perspective. His equating of enunciation (replaced in the 1930s by ‘rheme’) with ‘psychological predicate’ links his use of the term to the aim in later enunciation theory of bringing speakers and speech events directly into linguistic analysis.

Publication history
Table of contents

In Joseph (2025) I survey a range of figures who contributed to the concept of énonciation ‘enunciation’ over the course of the 20th century. Enunciation is an approach to the analysis of language that is centred on speakers and the act of speaking, rather than, or in addition to, the language system (langue) and the texts produced using it (parole). I have proposed that enunciation should not be treated, as is sometimes done, as the creation of one scholar, Émile Benveniste, but rather as a ‘distributed’ invention by Benveniste and the others discussed, who include J. L. Austin, Charles Bally, Leonard Bloomfield, Jacques Damourette, Jean Dubois, Michel Foucault, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Bronisɬaw Malinowski, Édouard Pichon, Hendrik Pos and Tvetzan Todorov.

Funding

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with University of Edinburgh.

References

Ammann, Hermann
1925–1928Die menschliche Rede: Sprachphilosophische Untersuchungen. 2 parts. Lahr im Breisgau: Moritz Schauenburg.
Bally, Charles
1932Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
Benveniste, Émile
1970 “L’appareil formel de l’énonciation”. Langages 17.12–18. Repr. in Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale 2. 79–88. Paris: Gallimard 1974 https://​doi​.org​/10​.3406​/lgge​.1970​.2572
Daneš, František
1994 “Prague School Functionalism as a Precursor of Text Linguistics”. Cahiers de l’ILSL, no 5, L’École de Prague: L’apport épistémologique ed. by Patrick Sériot & Mortéza Mahmoudian, 117–126. Lausanne: L’Institut de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage de l’Université de Lausanne.
Dubois, Jean
1969 “Énoncé et énonciation”. Langages 13. 100–110. https://​doi​.org​/10​.3406​/lgge​.1969​.2511
Firbas, Jan
1992 “The Why’s and the How’s in my Research into Functional Sentence Perspective”. Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in honour of René Dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, ed. by Martin Pütz, 335–358. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/z​.61​.28fir
Graffi, Giorgio
2001200 Years of Syntax: A critical survey. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/sihols​.98
Hajičová, Eva, Barbara Hall Partee & Petr Sgall
1998Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content. Dordrecht: Springer. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1007​/978​-94​-015​-9012​-9
Joseph, John E.
2025 “The Distributed Invention of Enunciation Theory”. Historiographia Linguistica 52:1. 1–40. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/hl​.00157​.jos
Krásová, Eva
2023 “The General Meaning as a Potential”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 55:1. 37–54. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1080​/03740463​.2023​.2234234
Mathesius, Vilém
1927 “Lingvistická charakteristika a její místo v moderním jazykozpytu” [‘Linguistic characterology and its place within modern linguistics’]. Časopis pro moderní filologii 13. 35–40.
1929 “On Linguistic Characterology with Illustrations from Modern English”. Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes, du 10–15 avril 1928 à la Haye, 56–63. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff. Repr. in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics ed. by Josef Vachek, 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1964.
1930 “O tak zvaném aktuálním členění větném” [‘On the so-called Functional Sentence Perspective’]. Slovo a Slovesnost 5. 171–174.
Nerlich, Brigitte & David D. Clarke
1996Language, Action and Context: The early history of pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://​doi​.org​/10​.1075​/sihols​.80
Noreen, Adolf
1923Einführung in die wissenschaftliche Betrachtung der Sprache. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Skalička, Vladimír
1937 “Promluva jako lingvistický pojem (L’enunciation [sic] comme notion de la linguistique)”. Slovo a Slovestnost 3. 163–166.
Trnka, Bohumil
1946 “Vilém Mathesius”. Časopis pro moderní filologii 39. 3–13. English trans. by Vladimir Honsa in Portraits of Linguists: A biographical source book for the history of Western linguistics, 1746–1963, vol. 2, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 474–489. Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1967.
Vachek, Josef
1980 “Vilém Mathesius as Forerunner of Contrastive Linguistic Studies”. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 11, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 5–15. Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
Weil, Henri
1844De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes: Question de grammaire générale. Paris: Joubert.

Address for correspondence

John E. Joseph

School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences

University of Edinburgh

Edinburgh EH8 9AD

United Kingdom

[email protected]
Publication history
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue