Attention and language

Maxim I. Stamenov
Table of contents

The topic of attention in relation to language has the potential for uniting the efforts of linguists and cognitive psychologists. Our presentation will be oriented toward their relationship at the level of simple sentence planning and comprehension, since this is a critical level of modeling (cf. Meyer et al. 2006). Modeling the dynamics of focusing in discourse processing (cf. Kendon 1992; Stevenson, Crawley & Kleinman 1994; Chafe 1994; van Dijk 1997; Tomlin 1997; Stamenov & Andonova 1998; Myachykov & Posner 2005) should have as its basis the relationships between the structure of attention, awareness and sentence structure. We will consider the functioning of attention in normal language use only, although there is also an extensive literature on different issues of the pathology of attention in language use (cf. Widlöcher & Hardy-Bayle 1989; Bates et al. 1995; Chapman & Ulatowska 1997; Meyer et al. 2006 for further orientation).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Baddeley, A.
1989 The uses of working memory. In P.R. Solomon et al. (eds.): 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Working memory. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.): The cognitive neurosciences: 755–764. MIT Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2000 The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., Ch Harris, V. Marchman, B. Wulfeck & M. Kritchevsky
1995 Production of complex syntax in normal ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 487–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L.
1986 Italian syntax. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S. & H. Ulatowska
1997 Discourse in Dementia: Consideration of consciousness. In M.I. Stamenov (ed.): 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1990 Accessibility ‘in principle’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 600–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. MIT Press. Google Scholar
2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N.
2001 The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 87–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner
2002 The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Duque, D., G. Grossi, I.M. Thornton & H.J. Neville
2003 Representation of change: Separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15: 491–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1990 Semantic structures. MIT Press. Google Scholar
2002 Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jonides, J. & E.E. Smith
1997 The architecture of working memory. In M. Rugg (ed.) Cognitive neuroscience: 243–276. Psychology Press. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D.
1973 Attention and effort. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Kendon, A.
1992 The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In A. Duranti & Ch Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon: 326–334. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koch, C. & N. Tsuchiya
2006 The relationship between attention and consciousness Part I. Paper presented at the, 10th annual meeting of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, June 2006, St. Anne College, Oxford.
Langacker, R.
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995 Conceptual grouping and constituency in cognitive grammar. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm 3: 149–172. Hanshin. Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
1995 Three levels of meaning. In F.R. Palmer (ed.)90–115. Grammar and meaning: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Mandler, G.
1985 Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
1989 Memory: Conscious and unconscious. In P.R. Solomon et al. (eds.): 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Consciousness recovered: Psychological functions and origins of conscious thought. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A., L. Wheeldon & A. Krott
(eds.) 2006 Automaticity and control in language processing. Psychology Press. Google Scholar
Myachykov, A. & M.I. Posner
2005 Attention in language. In L. Itti, G. Rees & J. Tsotsos (eds.) Neurobiology of attention: 324–329. Academic Press/Elsevier. Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R.
(ed.) 1998 The attentive brain. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Pashler, H.E.
1997 The psychology of attention. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Radford, A.
1997 Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, A. & S. Garrod
1994 Selective processing in text understanding. In M. Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics: 699–719. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Solomon, P.R., G.R. Goethals, C.M. Kelley & B.R. Stephens
(eds.) 1989 Memory: Interdisciplinary approaches. Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stamenov, M.I.
1997a Grammar, meaning and consciousness: What sentence structure can tell us about the structure of consciousness. In M.I. Stamenov (ed.): 277–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 1997b Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stamenov, M.I. & E. Andonova
1998 Lexical access and coreference processing in Bulgarian. In D. Hillert (ed.) Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective: 167–181. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R., R.A. Crawley & D. Kleinman
1994 Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 519–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1996 The windowing of attention in language. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning: 235–287. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tomlin, R.S.
1997 Mapping conceptual representations into linguistic representations: The role of attention in grammar. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (eds.) Language and Conceptualization: 162–189. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A.
1997 Cognitive context models and discourse. In M.I. Stamenov (ed.): 189–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vecchi, T. & G. Bottini
(eds.) 2006 Imagery and spatial cognition. Methods models and cognitive assessment. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widlöcher, D. & M. -C. Hardy-Bayle
1989 Cognition and control of action in psychopathology. Cahiers dePsychologie Cognitive 9: 583–615. Google Scholar