Cognitive linguistics

Dirk Geeraerts
Table of contents

Cognitive linguistics is an approach to the analysis of natural language that focuses on language as an instrument for organizing, processing, and conveying information. Methodologically speaking, the analysis of the conceptual and experiential basis of linguistic categories is of primary importance within cognitive linguistics: it primarily considers language as a system of categories. The formal structures of language are studied not as if they were autonomous, but as reflections of general conceptual organization, categorization principles, processing mechanisms, and experiential and environmental influences. Because cognitive linguistics sees language as embedded in the overall cognitive capacities of man, topics of special interest for cognitive linguistics include: the structural characteristics of natural language categorization (such as prototypicality, systematic polysemy, cognitive models, mental imagery and metaphor); the functional principles of linguistic organization (such as iconicity and naturalness); the conceptual interface between syntax and semantics (as explored by cognitive grammar and construction grammar); the experiential and pragmatic background of language-in-use; and the relationship between language and thought, including questions about relativism and conceptual universals.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Brugman, C. M.
1989 The story of over. Garland. Google Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934 Sprachtheorie. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Google Scholar
Deane, P. D.
1992 Grammar in mind and brain. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
1985 Mental spaces. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–255. Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. & P. Kay & M. C. O
1988 Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
1985 Paradigm and paradox. Leuven University Press. Google Scholar
1988 Cognitive grammar and the history of lexical semantics. In Rudzka-OstynB. (ed.): 647–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D. & S. Grondelaers & P. Bakema
1994 The structure of lexical variation. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geiger, R. A. & B. Rudzka-Ostyn
1993 Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
1980 Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua 50: 329–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985a Iconicity in syntax. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985b Natural syntax. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Holland, D. & N. Quinn
1987 Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987 The body in the mind. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
1986 Metaphors of anger pride, and love. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner
1989 More than cool reason. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar vol. ,1. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
1990 Concept image, and symbol. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of cognitive grammar vol. ,2. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
1992 Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68: 756–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
1993 Cognitive linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 269–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paprotté, W. & R. Dirven
1985 The ubiquity of metaphor. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
1992 The cognitive approach to natural language. In M. Pütz (ed.) Thirty years of linguistic evolution: 513–541. John Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E.
1978 Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.) Cognition and categorization: 27–48. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Rosch, E. & C. B. Mervis
1975 Family resemblances. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
1988 Topics in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, M.
1992 Einführung in die Kognitive Linguistik. Francke. Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990 From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
1978 Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.) vol 4 Universals of human language: 625–649. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
1983 How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (eds.) Spatial orientation: 225–282. Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Lexicalization patterns. In T. Shopen (ed.) vol 3 Language typology and syntactic description: 57–149. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
1988a Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988b The relation of grammar to cognition. In Rudzka-OstynB. (ed.): 165–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
1989 Linguistic categorization. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Tsohatzidis, S. L.
1990 Meanings and prototypes. Routledge. Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C.
1986 L’espace en français. Seuil. DOI logoGoogle Scholar