Linguists use the two notions of cohesion and coherence to refer to the (linguistically encoded or just assumed) connectedness of spoken as well as written discourse or text. Of course, connecting relations also hold among elements of structure within grammatical units such as word, phrase, clause or sentence. But these intra-sentential relations are different in kind because they are determined by phonological and grammatical rules and described, inter alia, as syntactic-semantic relations of valency, dependency, constituency, modification. Cohesion, operating inter-sententially, and coherence are key notions in text and discourse analysis, as well as in pragmatics because they also relate to the complex interrelationship between form, meaning and use of linguistic expressions in specific (social) contexts.
References
Bauman, R. & J. Sherzer
(eds.)1974Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Brown, G. & G. Yule
1983Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Bublitz, W.
1996Semantic prosody and cohesive company. Leuvense Bijdragen 85: 1–32.
Bublitz, W., U. Lenk & E. Ventola
(eds.)1999Coherence in spoken and written discourse: how to create it and how to describe it. John Benjamins. BoP
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
1983Intonatorische Kohäsion. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49: 74–100.
1984Coherence and connectivity. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 57–82.
Sanders, T. & W. Spooren
1999Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitzet al. (eds.): 235–250.
Schegloff, E.
1990On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.) Conversational organization and its development: 51–78. Ablex.
Sinclair, J.
1991Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T.
1972Some aspects of text grammars. Mouton.
Vuchinich, S.
1977Elements of cohesion between turns in ordinary conversation. Semiotics 20: 229–257. BoP