Cohesion and coherence

Wolfram Bublitz
Table of contents

Linguists use the two notions of cohesion and coherence to refer to the (linguistically encoded or just assumed) connectedness of spoken as well as written discourse or text. Of course, connecting relations also hold among elements of structure within grammatical units such as word, phrase, clause or sentence. But these intra-sentential relations are different in kind because they are determined by phonological and grammatical rules and described, inter alia, as syntactic-semantic relations of valency, dependency, constituency, modification. Cohesion, operating inter-sententially, and coherence are key notions in text and discourse analysis, as well as in pragmatics because they also relate to the complex interrelationship between form, meaning and use of linguistic expressions in specific (social) contexts.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bauman, R. & J. Sherzer
(eds.) 1974 Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G. & G. Yule
1983 Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, W.
1996 Semantic prosody and cohesive company. Leuvense Bijdragen 85: 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bublitz, W., U. Lenk & E. Ventola
(eds.) 1999 Coherence in spoken and written discourse: how to create it and how to describe it. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
1983 Intonatorische Kohäsion. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49: 74–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmondson, W.
1981 Spoken discourse. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G.
1994 Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in written text analysis: 83–101. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firbas, J.
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fritz, G.
1982 Kohärenz. Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999 Coherence in hypertext. In W. Bublitz et al. (eds.): 221–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geluykens, R.
1999 It takes two to cohere: the collaborative dimension of topical coherence in conversation. In W. Bublitz et al. (eds.): 33–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.A. & T. GivÓn
(eds.) 1995 Coherence in spontaneous text. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.J.
1982 Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Language, context, and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
1984 Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (ed.) Understanding reading comprehension: 181–219. International Reading Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellman, C.
1995 The notion of coherence in discourse. In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (eds.) Focus and coherence in discourse processing: 190–202. de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenk, U.
1998 Marking discourse coherence. Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenk, U., S. Gietl & W. Bublitz
1999 A bibliography of coherence and cohesion. In W. Bublitz et al. (eds.): 267–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linde, C.
1993 Life stories. The creation of coherence. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R.
1992 English text. System and structure. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mcneill, D. & E.T. Levy
1993 Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16: 363–386.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, J. & G. Hirst
1991 Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17: 21–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
1992 Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samet, J. & R. Schank
1984 Coherence and connectivity. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 57–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, T. & W. Spooren
1999 Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitz et al. (eds.): 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.
1990 On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.) Conversational organization and its development: 51–78. Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1991 Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.
1972 Some aspects of text grammars. Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vuchinich, S.
1977 Elements of cohesion between turns in ordinary conversation. Semiotics 20: 229–257.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue