Conversational logic (CL) can be defined briefly as a system designed to relate the ‘illogical’ (apparently non-fully informative, repetitive, unclear, irrelevant or not fully truthful) utterances common in most forms of human discourse to their rational and informative equivalents, in order to permit the rigorous analysis of language. A cornerstone of pragmatics since its development in the late 1960s, it has been subject to a great deal of interpretation and analysis, and has been tested and extended by application to several cultures and discourse genres. It has been incorporated into many academic disciplines: not only ordinary language philosophy within which it originated, and linguistics, into which it was brought in the early 1970s, but also fields as various as literary theory, cognitive psychology and psychotherapy, law, anthropology, and conversation analysis.
References
Austin, J. L.
1962How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Brown, P. & S. C. Levinson
1987Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Freud, S.
1911–15Papers on technique. In J. Strachey & A. Freud (eds.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 12: 91–171. Hogarth Press.
Green, G. M.
1989Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Erlbaum.
Green, G. M.
1990The universality of conversational implicature. In K. Hall (eds.): 411–428.
Grice, H. P.
1967Logic and conversation. Ms. William James Lectures, Harvard University.
Grice, H. P.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.) vol 3 Syntax and semantics: 41–58. Academic Press.
Grice, H. P.
1978Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (ed.) vol 9 Syntax and semantics: 113–128. Academic Press.
Grice, H. P.
1989Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
Gumperz, J. J.
1990Conversational cooperation in social perspective. In K. Hall (eds.): 429–441.
Hall, K. & J-P. Koenig & M. Meacham & S. Reinman & L. A. Sutton
(eds.)1990Proceedings of the 16th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society; Parasession on the legacy of GriceBerkeley Linguistics Society.
Horn, L. R.
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1984: 11–42. Georgetown University Press.
Lakoff, R. T.
1973The logic of politeness. In C. CorumT. C. Smith-Stark & A. Weiser (eds.) Papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: 345–356. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lakoff, R. T.
1989The limits of politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3): 101–129.
Lakoff, R. T.
1990aTalking power. Basic Books.
Lakoff, R. T.
1990bPhilosophy of language meets the real world. In K. Hall (eds.): 472–481.
Leech, G.
1983Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Levinson, S. C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Matsumoto, Y.
1989Politeness and conversational universals. Multilingua 8(2/3): 207–221.
Ochs Keenan, E.
1976The universality of conversational implicature. Language in Society 5: 67–80.
Searle, J. R.
1969Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R.
1979aThe logical status of fictional discourse. In J.R. Searle ,Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press. 58–75.
Searle, J. R.
1979bA taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In J.R. Searle ,Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press. 1–29.
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986Relevance. Harvard University Press.
Wainer, J. & A. Maida
1990Good and bad news in formalizing generalized implicatures. In K. Hall (eds.): 530–540.