Dependency and valency grammar

Rudi Gebruers
Table of contents

A dependency grammar (DG) is one which describes linguistic constructs primarily in terms of ‘dependency relations’. A dependency relation is an asymmetric relation between two elementary units, identifying one as the dominant element (called the ‘governor’, ‘regent’, ‘controller’, or ‘head’), and the other as the subordinate element (called the ‘dependent’, ‘controllee’, or ‘modifier’). Governors may themselves be dependents in a larger dependency hierarchy. Being direct links between units at the same level, dependency relations contrast with constituency relations, which hold between units at different levels. Dependencies can be looked upon as mere co-occurrence relations between governors and their dependents, or as constructional relations which, more or less directly, reflect connections of meaning.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Abraham, W.
(ed.) 1978 Valence, semantic case and grammatical relations. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, D. J.
1982 Valency and the English verb. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C
.et al. 1984 Pronom et syntaxe. Selaf. Google Scholar
Bühler, K.
1934 Sprachtheorie. Fischer. Google Scholar
Busse, W. & J-P. Dubost
1983 Französisches Verblexicon. Ernst Klett. Google Scholar
Dik, S. C.
1989 The theory of functional grammar, Part 1. Foris. Google Scholar
Emons, R.
1978 Valenzgrammatik für das Englische. Niemeyer. Google Scholar
Erben, J.
1958 Abriss der deutschen Grammatik. Akademie-Verlag. Google Scholar
Firbas, J.
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaifman, C.
1965 Dependency systems and phrase structure systems. Information and Control 8: 304–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. W.
1949 Structurele syntaxis. Servire. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Hays, D. G.
1964 Dependency theory. Language 40: 511–525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, G.
1992 Probleme der Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, G. & W. Schenkel
1973 Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. VEB Bibliographisches Institut. Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & S. Thompson
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A.
1990 English word grammar. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Korhonen, J.
1977 Studien zu Dependenz, Valenz und Satzmodell. Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kacnel’sonS. D.
1948 O grammatičeskoj kategorii. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta 2: 114–134. Google Scholar
Kunze, J.
1975 Abhängigkeitsgrammatik. Akademie-Verlag. Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
1986 The nature of grammatical valence. LAUD Paper A-160. Google Scholar
Langacker, R.  W.
1987/91 Foundations of cognitive grammar, vols. 1 and 2. Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Lecerf, Y. & P. Ihm
1960 Eléments pour une grammaire générale des langues projectives. Report GRISA 1: 11–29. Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.  A
.et al. 1984/88 Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Presses University de Montréal. Google Scholar
Schubert, K.
1987 Metataxis. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, H. & A. M. Hagspighl
1988 Valenzbibliographie. Institut für deutsche Sprache. Google Scholar
Schwitalla, J.
1988 Verbvalenz und Text. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 22: 266–269. Google Scholar
Sgall, P. & E. Hajičová & E. Benesová
1973 Topic, focus and generative semantics. Scriptor. Google Scholar
Somers, H.
1987 Valency and case in computational linguistics. Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar
Storrer, A.
1992 Verbvalenz. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, L.
1959 Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck. Google Scholar
Welke, K. M.
1988 Einführung in die Valenz- und Kasustheorie. VEB Bibliographisches Institut. Google Scholar
Wilks, Y
.et al. 1989 A tractable machine dictionary as a resource for computational semantics. In B. Boguraev & T. Briscoe (eds.) Computational lexicography and natural language processing: 193–228. Longman. Google Scholar