Discourse representation theory

Hans Kamp
Table of contents

Discourse representation theory (nowadays also known under its acronym DRT) is in the first instance a theory of natural language (NL) semantics. Its main relevance for pragmatics is that the theory has prompted a reassessment of the relationship between semantics and pragmatics.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Asher, N.
1993Reference to abstract objects in English. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J. & J. Perry
1983Situations and attitudes. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, I.
1982The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD. Diss., University of Massachusetts. Google Scholar
Kamp, H.
1984A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stokhoff (eds.) Truth, interpretation and information: 1–41. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Prolegomena to a structural account of belief and other propositional attitudes. In A. Anderson & W. Owens (eds.) Propositional attitudes. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & U. Reyle
1993From discourse to logic. Kluwer. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B.
1984Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Sandt, R. A.
1992Presuppositional projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar