Embodiment

Liesbet Quaeghebeur
Table of contents

In the course of the 20th century and due to a combination of a growing unrest under the dominance of Cartesianism, the consolidation of evolution theory and the emergence of Gestalt psychology, the literature on embodiment kicked off in all domains dealing with perception, cognition and language. Philosophers, psychologists, neurologists, linguists and social scientists have continued to draw on each other’s work since, convinced of the fact that the notoriously difficult relationship these phenomena have had with their material carriers for hundreds of years, should be grounded in a highly problematic dualism of mind and body, and not in reality. In this entry it is my aim to give the reader some preliminary acquaintance with different attempts at theories of embodied cognition and language. The scope will cover all approaches that are commonly referred to in the embodiment literature and will range from accounts that are almost metaphysical to applied linguistic theory.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bergen, B.K. & N. Chang
2005Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In: J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.): 147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, J. & R. Gwyn
(eds.) 2003Discourse, the body and identity. Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J
1896The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3: 357–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. & Levinson, S.
(eds.) 2006Roots of human sociality. Berg Press. Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner
2002The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica 6: 222–254. Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., P. Lenz Costa Lima & E. Francozo
2004Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1189–1210. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J
1979The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Goodwin, C
2003The body in action. In: J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (eds.): 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In: N. Enfield & S. Levinson (eds.): 96–125. Google Scholar
Heidegger, M
1978Being and time. Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar
Husserl, E
1988Cartesian meditations: an introduction to phenomenology. Kluwer. Google Scholar
Irigaray, L
1980This sex which is not one. In: E. Marks & I. De Courtivron (eds.). Google Scholar
James, W
1981The principles of psychology. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Janssen, T. & G. Redeker
(eds.) 1999Cognitive linguistics: foundations, scope, and methodology. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J
1984Revolutions in poetic language. Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1999Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books. Google Scholar
Langacker, R
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Larreta Zulategui, J.P
2001., Fraseología contrastiva del alemán y del español. Teoría y práctica a partir de un corpus bilingüe de somatismos. Peter Lang. Google Scholar
Macwhinney, B
1999The emergence of language. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Marks, E. & I. De Courtivron
(eds.) 1984New French feminists. The University of Massachusetts Press. Google Scholar
Mcneill, D
1992Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M
1964Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Noë, A
2004Action in perception. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Núñez, R
1999Could the future taste purple? Reclaiming mind, body and cognition. Journal of consciousness studies 6(11–12): 41–60. Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. & M. Fried
(eds.) 2005Construction grammars: cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E
1999Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In: T. Janssen & G. Redeker (eds.): 129–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F., E. Thompson & E. Rosch
1991The embodied mind. MIT Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L
1953Philosophical investigations. Blackwell. Google Scholar