Functional sentence perspective

Petr Sgall
Table of contents

The speaker can distinguish those sentence parts presented as easily accessible in the hearer’s memory (‘given’) from those denoting items to be attached in a ‘new’ relationship. In a declarative sentence the latter are asserted to hold about the former. This dichotomy, handled under headings such as Functional Sentence Perspective (FSP, topic-focus or theme-rheme articulation, information structure) since 150 years ago, was later discussed by German linguists (e.g. G. von der Gabelentz, H. Paul, P. Wegener, H. Ammann) and then introduced into structural linguistics by V. Mathesius; now this issue is crucial in discussions on the interplay of syntax, semantics and pragmatics. A detailed account can be found in Sgall et al. (1986).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Carlson, L.H.
1982 Dialogue games. Reidel.Google Scholar
Daneš, F.
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (ed.) Papers on FSP: 106–128. Academia.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.
1971 Subjects, speakers and roles. Synthese 21: 251–274. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Firbas, J.
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hajičová, E.
1972 Some remarks on presuppositions. Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 17: 11–23. E. Hajičová, T. Hoskovec .  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hajičová, E., B. Partee & P. Sgall
1998 Topic-focus Articulation, Tripartite Strucures, and Semantic Content. Kluwer Publishers. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.
1983 Fokus und Skalen. Niemeyer. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
1992 A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In J. Jacobs (ed.) Informationsstruktur und Grammatik (= Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft): 17–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, S.
1972 Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lötscher, A.
1987 Text und Thema. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, O. , Michael Půček & P. Sgall
1994 Die Thema-Rhema-Gliederung im Deutschen und ihre automatische Analyse. In U. Klenk (ed.) Computatio linguae 2.Google Scholar
Rochemont, M.
1986 Focus in generative grammar. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sgall, P. , E. Hajičová & J. Panevová
1986 The meaning of the sentence. Reidel/Academia.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Von Stechow, A.
1980 Notes on topic and focus of interrogatives and indicatives. Constance University Press.Google Scholar