Interlanguage pragmatics

Gabriele Kasper
Table of contents

Interlanguage pragmatics (ILP) represents an intersection of pragmatics and the study of second language acquisition. ‘Interlanguage’, a central construct in second language acquisition research, refers to second language learners’ developing (partly instable, transient) knowledge of a target language (L2) (Selinker 1972). Interlanguage includes features from L2, from the learner’s first language or other languages she may know (L1/Ln), and autonomous features which can neither be found in L1 or L2. Interlanguage theory was first formulated with a view to learners’ formal linguistic knowledge. When the first ILP studies appeared in 1979, interlanguage syntax, morphology, and phonology were already well-established areas of investigation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & B. Hartford
1993 Comparing observational and elicited data in interlanguage pragmatics. Paper, ‘Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics’, 10th AILA Congress, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E.
1993 Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.): 43–59 .  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bouton, L.F.
1994 Conversational implicature in the second language. Journal of Pragmatics 22:157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F.
1981 Conversational routine. Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N., H. Giles & J.M. Wiemann
1991 ‘Miscommunication’ and problematic talk. Sage.Google Scholar
Dufon, M.N.
1994 The role of input in the acqusition of politeness. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL 13 .Google Scholar
Edmondson, W.J. & J. House
1991 Do learners talk too much? In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith & M. Swain (eds.) Foreign/second language pedagogy research: 273–286. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
House, J.
1995 Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Janney, R.W. & H. Arndt
1992 Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact. In R.J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in language, 21–41. Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G.
1981 Pragmatische Aspekte in der Interimsprache. Narr.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992 Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research 8:203–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & S. Blum-Kulka
1993 Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & M. Dahl
1991 Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 215–247. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G. & R. Schmidt
1995 Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
1980 (ed.) Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E. & S. Blum-Kulka
1985 Degree of approximation: Nonnative reactions to native speech act behavior. In S. Gass & C. Madden (eds.) Input in second language acquisition: 303–325. Newbury House.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Olshtain, E. & A. Cohen
1983 Apology. In WolfsonN. & E. Judd (eds.): 18–35.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, A.
1995 Face in second language conversation. Studia Philologica Jyvaeskylaeensia 37.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
1992 Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14357–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Consciousness learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (eds.): 21–42 .  BoPGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
1972 Interlanguage. IRAL 10: 209–230. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, S.
1990 Exploring the comprehension process of nonliteral utterances and some implications for automaticity. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL 9: 67–97.Google Scholar
1995 Pragmatic transferability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. & H. Roitblat
1994 Comprehension of nonliteral utterances by nonnative speakers. Discourse Processes.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.
1983 Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4: 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, A.
1995 Interlanguage pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wildner-Bassett, M.
1984 Improving pragmatic aspects of learners’ interlanguage. Narr.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. & E. Judd
(eds) 1983 Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Newbury Park.  BoPGoogle Scholar