Computer-mediated communication

Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Table of contents

Academic studies of computer-mediated communication (henceforth CMC) are currently flourishing in a variety of social science disciplines. Within the broad linguistic areas of discourse studies and pragmatics alone, the range of topics and methodologies, as well as the pace of advances can only be rivaled by the rapid changes in the ever-growing medium itself. Research fascination with human-to-human interaction via computer networks such as the Internet cannot but be related to the fact that, particularly in the last decade, this type of interaction has taken the world of communication by storm, thus by now having secured a legitimate place for itself next to the older and well-established forms of mediated communication (e.g. telephone, television). As a result, it is hardly an exaggeration to claim that CMC has truly revolutionized social interaction, at least in technologically advanced societies.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Amiran, E. & J. Unsworth
1991Postmodern culture: publishing in the electronic medium. The Public-Access Computer System Review 2: 67–76.Google Scholar
Antaki, C. & S. Widdicombe
(eds.) 1998Identities in talk. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G.
1972Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Baym, N.
1995aThe emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S.G. Jones (ed.): 138–163.Google Scholar
1995bThe performance of humor in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (JCMC) [On-line] 1(2). Available: http://​209​.130​.1​.169​/jcmc​/vol1​/issue2​/baym​.html.Google Scholar
2000Tune, in log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Sage.Google Scholar
Bechar-Israeli, H.
1995From (Bonehead) to (cLoNehEAd): Nicknames, play and identity on Internet relay chat. JCMC 1(2). Available: http://​209​.130​.1​.169​/jcmc​/vol1​/issue2​/bechar​.html.Google Scholar
Beißwenger, M.M.
(ed.) 2001Chat-Kommunikation. Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
Berry, W.
1993Sex, economy, freedom, and community. Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bruckman, A.
1993Gender swapping on the Internet. Proceedings of INET93. Reston. Available: http://​www​.cc​.gatetech​.edu​.fac​/Amy​.Bruckman​/papers​/index​.html.
Cherny, L.
1999Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. CSLI.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Collot, M. & N. Belmore
1996Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S.C. Herring (ed.): 13–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danet, B.
(ed.) 1995Play and performance in computer-mediated communication. JCMC 1(2). Available: http://​209​.130​.1​.169​/jcmc​/vol1​/issue2/.Google Scholar
Danet, B. & S.K. Herring
(eds.) 2003The multilingual internet: Language, culture and communication in instant messaging, email and chat. JCMC 19 (Special issue). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/jcmc​/vol9​/issue1/. DOI: DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Danet, B., L. Ruedenberg-Wright & Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari
1997“HMMM…WHERE’S THAT SMOKE COMING FROM?”, Writing, Play and Performance on Internet Relay Chat. JCMC 2(4). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/vol2​/issue4​/danet​.html.Google Scholar
Davis, B.H. & J.P. Brewer
1997Electronic discourse: Linguistic individuals in virtual space. SUNY.Google Scholar
Du Bartell, D.
1995Discourse features of computer-mediated communication: “spoken-like” and “written-like”. In B. Warvik, S.K. Taskanen & R. Hiltunen (eds.) Turkuensia Anglicana: Organization in discourse: 231–239. Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. & C. Goodwin
(eds.) 1992Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1992Discourse and social change. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, K., H. Brunner & G. Whittemore
1991Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication 8: 8–34. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Foertsch, J.
1995The impact of electronic networks on scholarly communication: avenues to research. Discourse Processes 19: 301–28. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A.
1997Self-presentation and interactional alignments in e-mail discourse: the style- and code switches of Greek messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 141–164. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2005To tell or not to tell?: Email stories between on- and off-line interactions. Language @ Internet (http://​www​.languageatinternet​.de).Google Scholar
forthcoming) “On for drinkies?” E-mail cues of participant alignments. In S. Herring (ed.) Computer-mediated conversation Hampton Press
Gumperz, J.
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
GüntherU. & E.L. Wyss
1996E-mail-Briefe – eine neue Textsorte zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. In E. Hess-Lüttich, W. Holly & U. Püschel (eds.) Textstrukturen im Medienwandel: 61–86. Lang.Google Scholar
Harrison, T.M., T. Stephen & J. Winter
1991On-line journals: disciplinary designs for electronic scholarship. The Public-Access Computer Systems Review 2: 25–38.Google Scholar
Hawisher, G. & C. Selfe
(eds.) 2000Global literacies and the World-Wide Web. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Herring, S.K.
1993Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication 3: 1–17.Google Scholar
1999Interactional coherence in CMC. JCMC 4(4). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/jcmc​/vol4​/issue4​/herring​.html.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1996Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, S.
(ed.) 1995Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Sage.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1997Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. Sage.Google Scholar
Kiesler, S. & L. Sproull
1986Reducing social context cues. Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32: 1492–1512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesler, S., J. Siegel & T.W. Mcguire
1984Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39(10): 1123–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramarae, C. & J. Taylor
1993Women and men on electronic networks: a conversation or a monologue? In J. Taylor, C. Kramarae & M. Ebben (eds.) Women, Information Technology, and Scholarship: 52–61. Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Lea, M. & T. O’shea, P. Fung & R. Spears
1992“Flaming” in computer- mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.) Contexts of computer-mediated communication: 91–112. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Kress, G. & T. Van Leeuwen
1996Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marvin, L.E.
1995Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: The aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. JCMC 1(2). Available: http://​209​.130​.1​.169​/jcmc​/vol1​/issue2​/marvin​.html.Google Scholar
Matheson, K.
1991Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior 7: 137–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynor, N.
1994The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In G. Little & M. Montgomery (eds.) Centennial Usage Studies: 48–54. Publications of the American Dialect Society Series, University of Alabama.Google Scholar
Milroy, J.
1992Linguistic variation and change. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. & J. Milroy
1992Social network and social class. Language in Society 21(1): 1–26. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Moran, C. & G.E. Hawisher
1998The rhetorics and languages of electronic mail. In I. Snyder (ed.) From page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era: 80–101. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, D.
1987a“Anonymity is part of the magic”: Individual manipulation of computer-mediated communication contexts. Qualitative Sociology 10: 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987bA new environment for communication play: On-Line play. In G.A. Fine (ed.) Meaningful Play, Playful Meaning: 231–245. Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Paolillo, J.
1999The virtual speech community: Social network and language variation on IRC. JCMC 4(4). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/jcmc​/vol4​/issue4​/paolillo​.html.Google Scholar
Rafaeli, S.
1988Interactivity: From new media to communication. Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass and Interpersonal Processes. In R.B. Pawkins, J.M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (eds.) Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research V. 16: 110–133. Sage.Google Scholar
Rafaeli, S. & F. Sudweeks
Reid, E.
1991Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet Relay Chat. Unpublished electronic ms. adapted from B.A. Honors thesis. University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
1995Virtual worlds: Culture and imagination. In S. Jones (ed.): 164–183.Google Scholar
Rheingold, H.
1993The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Addison-Wesley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, R.E. & G. Love
1987Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research 14: 85–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savicki, V.
1997Gender language style and group composition in internet discussion groups. JCMC 2(3). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/jcmc​/vol2​/issue3​/savicki​.html.Google Scholar
Spender, D.
1995Nattering on the net. Women, power, and cyberspace. Spanifex Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
1982The oral/literate continuum in discourse. In D. Tannen (ed.) Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy: 1–16. Ablex. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Turner, V.
1974From liminal to liminoid: An essay in comparative symbology. Rice University Studies.Google Scholar
Watson, N.
1997Why we argue about virtual community: a case study of the fan community. In S. Jones (ed.): 102–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witmer, D. & S. Katzman
1997On-line smiles: does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? JCMC 2(4). Available: http://​www​.ascusc​.org​/jcmc​/vol2​/issue4​/witmer1​.html.Google Scholar
Werry, C.
1996Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (ed.): 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, S.
1992aComputer conferencing: A written or spoken environment? In Report No. 151. Centre for Information Technology in Education, The Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
1992bConflict and ambivalence over oral and literate boundaries: An examination of “literacy events” in computer-mediated communication. Centre for Information Technology in Education, The Open University, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
1996Oral and literate linguistic aspects of CMC discourse: a corpus based study. In S. Herring (ed.): 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar