Accommodation theory

Nikolas Coupland
Table of contents

The term ‘accommodation theory’ identifies a research program that has developed since the early 1970s, very largely stimulated by the research of Howard Giles and his colleagues. Accommodation theory accounts for diverse contextual processes that impinge on the selection of sociolinguistic codes, styles and strategies and their interactional consequences. In its earliest forms, accommodation theory was a strictly socio-psychological model of speech-style modification, best represented in Giles & Powesland’s (1975) account. Currently, accommodation theory has the status of a truly interdisciplinary model of relational processes in communicative interaction. In the view of some commentators (e.g. Bradac, Hopper & Wiemann 1989), accommodation theory is the predominant model at the interface of sociolinguistics, communication and social psychology. Studies across the disciplines, from various methodological and ideological perspectives, appear regularly.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Berger, C.R. & J.J. Bradac
1982 Language and social knowledge. Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Boden, D. & D. Bielby
1986 The way it was. Language and Communication 6: 73–89. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R.Y. & H. Giles
1977 The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (ed.) Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations: 119–135. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Bourhis, R.Y., H. Giles & W.E. Lambert
1975 Social consequences of accommodating one’s style of speech. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 6: 55–72. Google Scholar
Bourhis, R.Y., H. Giles & J-P. Leyens & H. Tajfel
1979 Psycholinguistic distinctiveness. In H. Giles & R. Stclair (eds.) Language and social psychology: 158–185. Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bradac, J.J. & R. Hopper & J.M. Wiemann
1989 Message effects. In J.J. Bradac (ed.) Message effects in communication science: 294–317. Sage. Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
1988 Gossip revisited. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (eds.) Women in their speech communities: 94–121. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Caporael, L. & G.H. Culbertson
1986 Verbal response modes of baby talk and other speech at institutions for the aged. Language and Communication 6(1/2): 99–112. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N.
1984 Accommodation at work. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70. Google Scholar
Coupland, N. & J. Coupland & H. Giles
1991 Language, society and the elderly. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. & J. Coupland & H. Giles & K. Henwood
1988 Accommodating the elderly. Language in Society 17: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. & H. Giles
(eds.) 1990 Communicative accommodation. Special issue of Language and Communication 8(3/4). Google Scholar
Giles, H.
1973 Accent mobility. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 87–105. Google Scholar
Giles, H. & N. Coupland
1991 Language: contexts and consequences. Open University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & N. Coupland & J. Coupland
(eds.) 1991 Contexts of accommodation. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & M. Hewstone
1982 Cognitive structures, speech and social situations. Language Sciences 5: 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & A. Mulac & J.J. Bradac & P. Johnson
1987 Speech accommodation theory. In M.L. Mclaughlin (ed.) Communication Yearbook 10: 13–48. Sage. Google Scholar
Giles, H. & P.F. Powesland
1975 Speech style and social evaluation. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & D.M. Taylor & R.Y. Bourhis
1973 Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language. Language in Society 2: 177–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, K. & K. Atkinson & N. Coupland
1990 Responding to the elderly. In H. Giles, N. Coupland & J. Wiemann (eds.) Communication health and ageing: 192–212. Manchester University Press. Google Scholar
Hamilton, H.E.
1991 Accommodation and mental disability. In H. Giles, N. Coupland & J. Coupland (eds.): 157–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Patient. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natale, M.
1975 Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32: 790–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. & J. Edwards
1992 Discursive psychology. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. & M. Wetherell
1987 Discourse and social psychology. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J. & K.J. Gergen
(eds.) 1989 Texts of identity. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H.
1974 Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information 13: 65–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thakerar, J.N. & H. Giles & J. Cheshire
1982 Psychological and linguistic parameters of speech accommodation theory. In C. Fraser & K.R. Scherer (eds.) Advances in the social psychology of language: 205–255. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Williams, F.
1976 Explorations in the linguistic attitudes of teachers. Newbury House. Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.H. & C. West
1975 Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversations. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (eds.) Language and sex: 105–129. Newbury House.  BoPGoogle Scholar