Computational linguistics

Anne De Roeck
Table of contents

A delimitation of computational linguistics (CL) is hard to formulate. Merely identifying CL with the computational treatment of human language is not useful: such a definition would include crude string manipulation applications as can be found in word processing, as well as results in speech processing, which should be seen as a discipline in its own right. On the other hand, a useful working definition must be broad enough to encompass theoretical contributions as well as the computational tools and techniques which have evolved in their wake.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aho, A.D. & J.D. Ullman
1972 The theory of parsing, translation, and compiling. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Alshawi, H.
(ed.) 1992 The core language engine. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Asher, N. & A. Lascarides
1993 A semantics and pragmatics for the pluperfect. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL: 250–259. Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y.
1953 A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic representation. Language 29. Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & J. Perry
1983 Situations and attitudes. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R.C. & A. Weinberg
1982 Parsing efficiency, computational complexity and the evaluation of grammatical theories. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 165–191. Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(ed.) 1982 The mental representation of grammatical relations. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, T. & J. Carroll
1993 Generalised probabilistic LR parsing of natural language (corpora) with unification-based grammars. Computational Linguistics 19: 25–60. Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. & S. Mcconnell-Ginet
1993 An introduction to semantics. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 Syntactic structures. Mouton. Google Scholar
1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Church, K.W. & R.L. Mercer
1993 Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics using large corpora. Computational Linguistics 19: 1–24. Google Scholar
Cohen, P.R. & C.R. Perrault
1979 Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts. Cognitive Science 7: 171–190. Google Scholar
Cooper, R.
1983 Quantification and syntactic theory. Reidel. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D.R. & R.E. Wall & S. Peters
1981 Introduction to Montague semantics. Reidel. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & E. Klein & G.K. Pullum & I. Sag
1985 Generalised phrase structure grammar. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. & C. Mellish
1989 Natural language processing in Prolog. Addison Wesley. Google Scholar
Grosz, B.J. & C.L. Sidner
1986 Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–205. Google Scholar
Grosz, B.J. & K. Sparck-Jones & B. Lynn-Webber
(eds.) 1986 Readings in natural language processing. Morgan Kaufmann.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Harman, G.H.
1963 Generative grammars without transformation rules. Language 39. Google Scholar
Heim, I.
1982 The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. PhD. Diss., University of Massachussetts, Amherst. Google Scholar
Hindle, D.
1989 Acquiring disambiguation rules from text. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the ACL: 118–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J.R.
1978 Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44: 311–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.S.
1977 X-bar syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kamp, H.
1981 A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk , T. Janssen & M. Stokhof (eds.) Formal methods in the study of language. Reidel. Google Scholar
Kaplan, R.M.
1973 A general syntactic processor. In R. Rustin (ed.) Natural language processing: 193–241. Algorithmics Press. Google Scholar
Kay, M.
1973 The MIND system. In R. Rustin (ed.) Natural language processing: 155–188. Algorithmics Press. Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, K.
1983 Two-level model for morphological analysis. Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 683–685. Google Scholar
Montague, R.
1973 The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintakka , J. Moravcsik & P. Puppes (eds.) Approaches to natural language: 221–242. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrault, R.C.
1984 On the mathematical properties of linguistic theories. Computational Linguistics 10: 165–176. Google Scholar
Perreira, F.C.N. & D.H.D. Warren
1980 Definite clause grammars for language analysis. Artificial Intelligence 13: 231–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, P.S. & R.W. Ritchie
1973 On the generative power of transformational grammar. Information Science 6: 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, C. & I. Sag
1987 Information based syntax and semantics, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Ritchie, G. & A. Black & G. Russell & S. Pulman
1992 Computational morphology. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Sells, P.
1985 Lecture notes on contemporary syntactic theories. CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford. Google Scholar
Shieber, S.M.
1986 An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar. CSLI Lecture NotesStanford. Google Scholar
Sidner, C.L.
1983 Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In M. Brady & R.C. Berwick (eds.) Computational models of discourse: 267–330. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Tomita, M.
1985 An efficient context-free parsing algorithm for natural languages and its applications. PhD. Diss., Carnegie Mellon University. Google Scholar
Winograd, T.
1973 A procedural model of language understanding. In Schank & Colby (eds.) Computer models of thought and language: 152–186. Freeman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1983 Language as a cognitive process, vol. 1. Addison Wesley. Google Scholar
Woods, W.
1978 Semantics and quantification in natural language question answering. In Yovits (ed.) Advances in computers vol. 17: 2–64. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Yngve, V.
1967 MT at MIT in 1965. In A.D. Booth (ed.) Machine translation. Mouton. Google Scholar
Zeevat, H.
1989 A compositional approach to discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar