Dominiek Sandra
Table of contents

This contribution on the experimental methodology in language research cannot possibly review all relevant experimental techniques. I have restricted the discussion to the following two topics. First I will describe the most essential characteristics of experimental linguistic research in contrast to other approaches to language. Then I will try to outline the logic characterizing many forms of experimentation, using the area of psycholinguistics for purposes of illustration.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Burani, C. & A. Caramazza
1987Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 217–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. & T. Bever
1965The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 4: 414–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foss, D.J. & D.T. Hakes
1978Psycholinguistics. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Frazier, L., C. Clifton & J. Randall
1983Filling gaps. Cognition 13: 187–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garnham, A.
1985Psycholinguistics. Methuen.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, A.
1994Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kess, J.F.
1992Psycholinguistics. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stanners, R.F., J.J. Neiser, W.P. Hernon & R. Hall
1979Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar