Structuralism

Dominique Willems
Table of contents

In a celebrated text, Lévi-Strauss (1958: 306) delineated the object of the structural sciences as “those phenomena which display the features of a system”, i.e. each complex from which one element cannot be modified without causing modifications in all other elements. As their instrument, he proposed the construction of models.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Apresjan, J.D.
1966Analyse distributionnelle des significations et champs sémantiques structurés. Langages 1: 44–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
——
1973Eléments sur les idées et les méthodes de la linguistique structurale contemporaine. Dunod.Google Scholar
Barthes, R.
1966Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications 8: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bendix, E.H.
1966Componential analysis of general vocabulary. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E.
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2 vols. Gallimard.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1933Language. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Boas, F.
1911Handbook of American Indian languages, vol. 1. USGPO.Google Scholar
Bremond, C.
1973La logique du récit. Seuil.Google Scholar
Corneille, J.P.
1976La linguistique structurale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Dressler, W.
1978Current trends in textlinguistics. De Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, O.
1968Qu’est-ce que le structuralisme?, vol. 1. Seuil.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R.
1957Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, H.A.
1955An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J.
1966Sémantique structurale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Guillaume, G.
1964Langage et science du langage. Nizet.Google Scholar
Harris, Z.H.
1951Methods in structural linguistics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
——
1952Discourse analysis. Language 28: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L.
1953Prolegomena to a theory of language. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
——
1959Essais linguistiques. Minuit.Google Scholar
Von Humboldt, W.
1822Ueber das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen und ihrer Einfluss auf die Ideen.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1962Selected writings. Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
——
1973Questions de poétique. Seuil.Google Scholar
Joos, M.
1958Readings in linguistics. American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & J. Fodor
1964The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 170–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
1979De la sémantique lexicale à la sémantique de l’énonciation. Presses University de Lille.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C.
1958Anthropologie structurale. Plon.Google Scholar
Longacre, R.
1972Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents in New Guinea languages. Georgetown University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R. & F. Woods
1977–1978Discourse grammar, 3 vols. Summer Institute of Linguistics.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, F.G.
1956A semantic analysis of Pawnee kinship usage. Language 32: 158–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1963Structural semantics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, A.
1960Eléments de linguistique générale. Colin.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.
1967Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pottier, B.
1964Vers une sémantique moderne. Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature 1: 107–138.Google Scholar
——
1968Champ sémantique, champ d’expérience et structure lexicale. Zeitschrift für Französische Sprache (Probleme der Semantik) 1968: 37–41.Google Scholar
Robin, R.
1986L’Analyse du discours entre la linguistique et les sciences humaines. Langages 81.Google Scholar
Robins, R.H.
1964General linguistics. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E.
1921Language. Harcourt, Brace & World.  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Saussure, F.
1916Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L.
1959Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Todorov, T.
1969Grammaire du ‘Décameron’. Mouton.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S.
1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Vachek, J.
1964A Prague School reader in linguistics. Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, S.
1962Semantics. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U.
1963On the semantic structure of language. In J. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of language: 142–216. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
——
1970Explorations in semantic theory. In T. Sebeok (ed.) Current trends in linguistics, vol. 3: 395–477. Mouton.Google Scholar
Wells, R.S.
1948Immediate constituents. Language 24: 168–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar