Dominiek Sandra
Table of contents

The experimental method is one of several methods that scientists in many disciplines can use to study a phenomenon. It is not superior to other methods; it simply has its own rules and domains of application. Some research questions naturally require experimentation to be answered satisfactorily, others can also (sometimes: better) be approached by relying on other research methods. Experiments can be characterized as a means to test an empirical hypothesis in a highly targeted way (experimental purpose) and as a particular way of collecting data (experimental methodology) and analyzing these data (statistics). In a sense there are two ways of studying an object of investigation: theoretical reflection and empirical analysis. Obviously, all scientists rely on observations (data); the difference between theoretical and empirical scientists mainly lies in the way they collect their data and what their targets are at the level of theoretical claims.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Baayen, R. H.
in press) Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Baayen, R. H., L. H. Wurm & J. Aycock
2007Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon 2: 419–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkum, J. J. A. Van, D. Van Den Brink, C. M. J.Y Tesink, M. Kos & P. Hagoort
2008The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 580–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifton Jr., C. & A. Staub
2008Parallelism and competition in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 234–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.
1983The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement 7: 249–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, K., D. Sandra & J. Grainger
2005Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 75–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F. & J. M. Henderson
1990Use of Verb Information in Syntactic Parsing: Evidence From Eye Movements and Word-by-Word Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 555–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. H., W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill
(eds) 2007Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Elsevier. Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. & C. Davis
1984Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 680–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forbach, G. B., R. F. Stanners & L. Hochaus
1974Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition 2: 337–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fromkin VictoriaA.
Ed 1973Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague, Mouton. Google Scholar
Garrett, M. F.
1975The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Volume 9). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. & P. J. Holcomb
2009An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Research 1270: 45–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P.
2008The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363: 1055–1070. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holcomb, P. J. & J. Grainger
2009ERP effects of short interval masked associative and repetition priming. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22: 301–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirk, R. E.
1982Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole. Google Scholar
Koornneef, A. W. & J. J. A. Van Berkum
2006On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 445–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longtin, C. M., J. Segui & P. A. Hallé
2003Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 313–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mccall, R. B.
1970Fundamental Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. (5th ed.) Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar
Midgley, K. J., P. J. Holcomb & J. Grainger
2009Masked repetition and translation priming in second language learners: A window on the time-course of form and meaning activation using ERPs. Psychophysiology 46: 551–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A., B. J. Juhasz, E. D. Reichle, D. Machacek & K. Rayner
2008Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements during reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peformance 34: 726–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollatsek, A., K. Rayner & E. Reichle
in press). The E-Z Reader model of silent reading. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai & G. Yan (eds.) Cognitive and Cultural Influences on Eye Movements Psychology Press
Rayner, K., K. Chace, T. Slattery & J. Ashby
2006Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 10: 241–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. & A. Pollatsek
in press). Eye movements during reading. In B. Goldstein (Ed.) Sage Encyclopedia of Perception Sage Press DOI logo
Rayner, K., A. Pollatsek, D. Drieghe, T. J. Slattery & E. D. Reichle
2007Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136: 520–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, D. L., C. Cortese & H. S. Scarborough
1977Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SchreuderR. & R. H. Baayen
1997How Complex Simplex Words Can Be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S.
1956Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Staub, A. & K. Rayner
2007Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In G. Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics: 327–342. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Trueswell, J. C.
1996The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 566–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., D. Van Den Brink, C. M. J. Y. Tesink, M. Kos & P. Hagoort
2008The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4): 580–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., A. Zyürek & P. Hagoort
2008Seeing and hearing meaning: event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of word versus picture integration into a sentence context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 1235–1249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar