Nexus analysis

Pia Lane
Table of contents

The primary concern of nexus analysis is the complex relations between discourse and action. All action is seen as inherently social and mediated; that is, carried out by social actors through the use of mediational means. Though concerned with oral and written text, the main focus of nexus analysis is not texts in themselves, but rather the relationship between text and action. Scollon (2001a: 144) points out how several research traditions, though concerned with the relationship between language and the social world, tend to overlook the crucial role of actions, which results in a slanted focus in favour of texts:

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Agar, Michael.
1996The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. [2nd edn]. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Al Zidjaly, Najma.
2006 “Disability and anticipatory discourse: The interconnectedness of local and global aspects of talk.” Communication & Medicine 3(2): 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan.
2010 “Historical bodies and historical space.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies. Paper 57. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 [1972]Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C., E. Frazer, P. Harvey, B. Rampton and K. Richardson
1997 “Ethics, advocacy and empowerment in researching language.” In Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook, ed. by N. Coupland and A. Jaworski, 145–162. Wiltshire: Macmillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1992 “Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as a community-based practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman.
2001Language and Power. [2nd edn]. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul.
1999An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving.
1963Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hult, Francis.
2013 “Drive-thru linguistic landscaping: Constructing a linguistically dominant place in a bilingual space.” International Journal of Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell.
1966 “Two types of linguistic relativity.” In Sociolinguistics, ed. by W. Bright. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lane, Pia.
2009 “Identities in action. A nexus analysis of identity construction and language shift.” Visual Communication 8: 449–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, Pia
2012 “Multimodality and culture.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Lingusistic, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno.
2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
1991Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, Sigrid and Rodney H. Jones
(eds.) 2005Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, S.
2002A Theoretical Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis Presented via the Analysis of Identity Construction of Two Women Living in Germany. Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University. UMI.
Norris, Sigrid.
2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari, Pia Lane, Hanni Salo and Sirkka Laihiala-Kankainen
2011 “Frozen actions in arctic linguistic landscape: A nexus analysis of language processes in visual space.” International Journal of Multilingualism, 27(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, Sari and Anne Pitkänen-Huhta
2013 “Multimodal literacy practices in the indigenous Sámi classroom: Children navigating in a complex multilingual setting.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education 12: 230–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinch, Trevor and Wiebe Bijker
1986 “Science, relativism and the new sociology of technology: Reply to Russell.” Social Studies of Science 16: 347–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Luisa Martín and Angel Gabilondo Pujol
2011 “Michel Foucault.” In: Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saint Georges, Ingrid.
2005 “From anticipation to performance: Sites of engagement as performance.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 155–165. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant.
1996 “Public discourse.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron.
2001a “Action and text.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 139–183. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2001bMediated Discourse Analysis. The nexus of practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008 “Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization.” In Advances in Discourse Studies, ed. by Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney H. Jones, 233–244. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron and Suzie Wong Scollon
2002 “Nexus analysis. Expanding the circumference of discourse analysis.” Talk given at the PARC Forum, Dec 12, 2002. Palo Alto, California.
2007 “Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 608–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef.
2012 “The pragmatic perspective.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, James.
1991Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth.
2006 “Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar