Signed language pragmatics

Terry Janzen, Barbara Shaffer & Sherman Wilcox
Table of contents

Signed languages are natural human languages used by deaf people throughout the world as their native or primary language. Although no formal survey of the world’s signed languages has ever been conducted, it is generally assumed that they number in the hundreds – the 16th edition of the Summer Institute of Linguistics Ethnologue of the world’s languages lists 130 signed languages (Lewis 2009).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Baker, C. & D. Cokely
1980 American Sign Language: A Teacher’s Resource Text on Grammar and Culture. T.J. Publishers. Google Scholar
Battison, R.
1978 Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Linstok Press. Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. & C. Dubuisson
1995 Grammar, order and position of wh-signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 24, 87: 99–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, R.
1994 Pragmatics and productivity. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.) Perspectives on sign language usage: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. 2: 371–390. International Sign Language Association. Google Scholar
Bybee, J., R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & S. Fleishman
1995 Introduction. In J. Bybee & S Fleishman (eds.): 1–14. DOI logo
(eds.) 1995 Modality in Grammar and Discourse. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celo, R.
1996 Pragmatic aspects of the interrogative form in Italian Sign Language. In C. Lucas (ed.) Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities: 132–151. Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar
Chafe, R.
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Coates, R.
1990 Modal Meaning: The Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Journal of Semantics 7: 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.) Language, Gesture, and Space: 133–154. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ferreira-Brito, L.
1990 Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian Sign Language. In S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.) Theoretical issues in Sign Language Research. Vol. 1.: Linguistics. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Girod, M.
1997 La Langue des Signes. ITV. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J.
1978 Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, T., C. Padden & T. J. O’rourke
1980 A basic course in American Sign Language. TJ Publishers. Google Scholar
Janzen, T.
1998 Topicality in ASL: Information ordering, constituent structure, and the function of topic marking. Ph.D. Diss., University of New Mexico. Google Scholar
1999 The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language 23(2): 271–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, E. S. & U. Bellugi
1979 The Signs of Language. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P.
(ed.) 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International. Online version: http://​www​.ethnologue​.com/. Google Scholar
Li, C. N. & S. A. Thompson
1976 Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic:457–490. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Liddell, S.
1980 American Sign Language Syntax. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977 Semantics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Meier, R.P
2002 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In R. P. Meier, K. Cormier & D. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages. Cambridge University Press. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, A.-L.
2008 Spatial Strategies in Descriptive Discourse: Use of Signing Space in Swedish Sign Language. CDS/LSCS Monograph No. 2. Dublin, Ireland: Centre for Deaf Studies, University of Dublin, Trinity College. Google Scholar
Poulin, C. & C. Miller
1995 On narrative discourse and point of view in Quebec Sign Language. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.) Language, Gesture, and Space: 117–131. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Scheibman, J.
1999 Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. Paper presented at Symposium on Frequency Effects and Emergent Grammar, Carnegie Mellon University, May 28–30.
Shaffer, B.
1996 The Future Gram in ASL. Unpublished ms, University of New Mexico. Google Scholar
1999 Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives on Negative Modals in ASL. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the High Desert Linguistics Society , March 26–28, 1999, Albuquerque.
2000 A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of necessity and possibility in American Sign Language. Ph.D. Diss., University of New Mexico. Google Scholar
2002 CAN’T: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies, 3:1, 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 175–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, W. C.
1978 Sign Language Structure: The First Linguistic Analysis of American Sign Language. Linstok Press. Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
1989 On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning: an Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Der Auwera, J.
2000 On the Typology of Negative Modals. In E. A. Hoeksema (ed.) Proceedings of the Groningen Conference on Negation: 25–50. Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., L.Leeson & O. Crasborn
2007 Simultaneity in signed languages: A string of sequentially organized issues. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and Function. John Benjamins. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S.
1996 Not from Jove’s Brow. Language & Communication 16(2): 179–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Cognitive Iconicity and Signed Language Universals. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference on Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, October 10–12, 1998, Emory University, Atlanta.
Wilcox, S. & P. Wilcox
1995 The Gestural Expression of Modality in ASL. In J. Bybee & S. Fleishman (eds.): 135–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 The analysis of signed languages. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford University Press: 739–760.Google Scholar
Woll, B.
1981 Question structure in British Sign Language. In B. Woll, J. Kyle & M. Deuchar (eds.) Perspectives on British Sign Language and deafness: 136–149. Croom Helm.Google Scholar