Text linguistics

Robert de Beaugrande
Table of contents

A decisive step in the rise of modern ‘Western Continental’ linguistics was to instate the central tenet that language should be considered a uniform, stable and abstract system apart from variations due to individual or social contexts and activities. The description of the language should be couched in highly general statements about the language as a whole or even in universal ones about all languages. This (Saussurean) programme inaugurated the search for the complete set of constraints upon ‘language in and for itself’ (‘langue’) without reference to the use of language (‘parole’). The constraints should cover all valid instances or sets of instances of the language.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Baker, M., G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli
1993Text and technology. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
1980Text, discourse, and process. Ablex. Google Scholar
1984Text production. Ablex. Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. & W. Dressler
1981Introduction to text linguistics. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellert, I.
1970On a condition of the coherence of texts. Semiotica 2: 335–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1933Language. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957Syntactic structures. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Coseriu, E.
1971Intervention in the discussion ‘Textlinguistik’. In StempelW.-D. (ed.). Beiträge zur Textlinguistik: 189–216. Fink. Google Scholar
1964A three-level approach to syntax. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1: 225–240. Google Scholar
1970Zur linguistischen Analyse der Textstruktur. Folia Linguistica 4: 72–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.
1972Some aspects of text grammars. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976Text and context. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978Textwissenschaft. Niemeyer. Google Scholar
1979Macro-structures. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T
et al. 1972Zur Bestimmung narrativer Strukturen auf der Grundlage von Textgrammatiken. Buske. Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. & W. Kintsch
1983Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Dressler, W.
1970Modelle und Methoden der Textsyntax. Folia Linguistica 4: 64–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1977Current trends in text linguistics. De Gruyter. Google Scholar
Enkvist, N.-E.
1977Stylistics and text linguistics. In DresslerW. (ed.). 174–190. Google Scholar
Freedle, R.
(ed.) 1977Discourse production and comprehension. Ablex. Google Scholar
1979New directions in discourse processing. Ablex. Google Scholar
Gülich, E.
1970Makrosyntax der Gliederungssignale im gesprochenen Französisch. Fink. Google Scholar
Gunter, R.
1963Elliptical sentences in American English. Lingua 12: 137–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. & R. Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. Longman. Google Scholar
Harris, Z.
1952Discourse analysis. Language 28: 1–30/474–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, P.
1968Zum Begriff des sprachlichen Zeichens. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 21: 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harweg, R.
1968aPronomina und Textkonstitution. Fink. Google Scholar
1968bTextanfänge in geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache. Orbis 17: 343–388. Google Scholar
Isačenko, A.
1965Kontextbedingte Ellipse und Pronominalisierung im Deutschen. Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Volkskunde und Literaturforschung: 163–174. Akademie. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isenberg, H.
1970Der Begriff ‘Text’ in der Sprachtheorie. Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, W., W. Klein & R. Meyer-Hermann & K. Netzer & H.-J. Siebert
1971Lektürenkolleg: Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Universität Bielefeld. Google Scholar
Longacre, R.
1990Storyline concerns and word order typology in East and West Africa. UCLA Dept. of Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palek, B.
1969Cross-reference. Charles University Press. Google Scholar
Petöfi, J
1978A formal semiotic text theory as an integrated theory of natural language. In Dressler, W. (ed.). 34–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Saussure, F.
(1966) [1916] Course in general linguistics. McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. J.
1973Texttheorie. Fink. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1976Pragmatik 2. Fink. Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M.
1992aPriorities in discourse analysis. In CoulthardM. (ed.). Advances in spoken discourse analysis: 79–88. Routledge. Google Scholar
1992bThe automatic analysis of corpora. In SvartlikJ. (ed.). Directions in corpus linguistics: 379–397. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Large-corpus linguistics at the crossroads(video). University of Vienna. Google Scholar
Steinitz, R.
1971Nominale Proformen. In KallmeyerW et al. (eds.). 375–397. Google Scholar
Stubbs, M.
1993British traditions in text analysis. In BakerM et al. (eds.). 1–33. Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
1964Tempus. Kohlhammer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967Syntax als Dialektik. Poetica 1: 109–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1969Textlinguistik. Jahrbuch für Internationale Germanistik 1: 61–74. Google Scholar
1976Sprachen in Texten. Klett. Google Scholar