Indexicality

Tomi VisakkoHeini Lehtonen
Table of contents

In the study of language, the term indexicality typically refers to a realm of meaning that is not based on the symbolic contents of linguistic signs per se, but on the context-dependent configurations and effects of linguistic signs in use. These effects are at work, for example, when German is used in car advertisements (Volkswagen. Das Auto.) and restaurants all around the globe are named with French looking/sounding names. There is nothing about the structure of German language that makes it especially suitable for selling cars. It is the indexicality of Deutsch that invokes associations with advanced technology, functionality, and reliability, in the same way as français is associated with culinary pleasures and culture (Hornikx et al. 2013).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aarsæther, Finn
2010 “The use of multiethnic youth language in Oslo.” In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices, ed. by Pia Quist and Bente Ailin Svendsen, 111–126. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif
2003 “The social life of cultural value.” Language & Communication 23 (3–4): 231–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Voice, footing, enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 38–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007aLanguage and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007b “Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime.” Language & Communication 27: 320–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahtosalo, Milja
2012Minän monet muodot: Yksikön 1. persoonan pronominin variaatio neljän suomi toisena kielenä -opettajan puheessa. [Many forms of minä: The variation of the first-person singular pronoun in the speech of four Finnish as a second language teachers.] Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard
2004A World of Others’ Words. Cross-cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs
1990 “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan, and Andy Gibson
2011 “Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (5): 555–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2001 “Context is/as critique.” Critique of Anthropology 21 (1): 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a “Sociolinguistic scales.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b “Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2: 115–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “Bernstein and poetics revisited: Voice, globalization and education.” Discourse & Society 19 : 425–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 105–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Are chronotopes helpful? Why do we need another word for context?Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 243: 1–9.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Dong Jie
2010Ethnographic Fieldwork: A Beginner’s Guide. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles, and Richard Bauman
1992 “Genre, intertextuality, and social power.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2 (2): 131–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calder, Jeremy
2019 “From Sissy to sickening: The indexical landscape of /s/ in SoMa, San Francisco.” Linguistic Anthropology 29 (3): 332–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carr, Summerson E., and Michael Lempert
2016Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Oakland: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
2007Style. Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna, and Sabina Perrino
2020 “Introduction: Chronotopes and chronotopic relations.” Language & Communication 70: 67–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1989Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
2000Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gadet, Françoise
2022 “Youth vernaculars in Paris and surroundings.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 264–281. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Judith Irvine
2019Signs of Difference. Language and Ideology in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, Johan, and Sally Boyd
2022 “Sweden: Suburban Swedish.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 246–263. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John
1982Discourse Strategies. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Contextualization revisited.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen
2005 “Towards understanding modern persuasion.” In Persuasion Across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halonen, Mia, Sami Nyström, Heikki Paunonen, and Johanna Vaattovaara
2020Stadin syntinen s. [The sinful s of Helsinki City.] Helsinki: Art House.Google Scholar
Hanks, William
1992 “The indexical ground of deictic reference.” In Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 43–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornikx, Jos, Frank van Meurs, and Robert-Jan Hof
2013 “The effectiveness of foreign-language display in advertising for congruent versus incongruent products.” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25 (3), 152–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, and Susan Gal
2000 “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul Kroskrity, 35–83. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009 “Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 1–28. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, ed. by Nicolas Coupland, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2016 “Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking.” Language and Linguistics Compass 10 (11): 632–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus, and Andrew E. Danielson
2006 “Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’.” Journal of English Linguistics (34) 2: 77–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kettunen, Lauri
1940Suomen murteet III A. Murrekartasto. [Finnish dialects III A. Dialect maps.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society. http://​kettunen​.fnhost​.org​/?i​=1
Kiesling, Scott F.
2009 “Style as Stance.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 171–194. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Jan Sverre
2010 “ ‘Playing with words as if it was a rap game’: Hip-hop street language in Oslo.” In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices, ed. by Pia Quist and Bente Ailin Svendsen, 156–169. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2013Agent, Person, Subject, Self. A Theory of Ontology, Interaction, and Infrastructure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V.
(ed.) 2000Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lappalainen, Hanna
2004Variaatio ja sen funktiot. Erään sosiaalisen verkoston jäsenten kielellisen vuorovaikutuksen tarkastelua. [Variation and its functions. Examining the linguistic interactions of members of a social network.] Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin
1997aTalking Heads. Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
1997b “Metalanguages and subjectivities.” In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 365–392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, Heini
2011 “Developing Multiethnic Youth Language in Helsinki.” In Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas, ed. by Friederike Kern and Margaret Selting, 291–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Tyylitellen. Nuorten kielelliset resurssit ja kielen sosiaalinen indeksisyys monietnisessä Helsingissä. [Stylizing. The linguistic resources of adolescents and the social indexicality of language in multiethnic Helsinki.]” MA thesis, University of Helsinki. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10138​/155659
2016 a “What’s up Helsinki? New linguistic diversity among adolescents.” In Linguistic Genocide or Superdiversity. New and Old Language Diversities, ed. by Reetta Toivanen and Janne Saarikivi, 65–90. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b “Troping on prejudice. Stylised “bad Finnish” performances among adolescents in Eastern Helsinki.” AILA Review 29 (1): 15–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai, Martha Sif Kaerrebaek, Janus Spindler Møller
(eds.) 2015Everyday Languaging: Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth. Trends in Applied Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mertz, Elisabeth
1985 “Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation.” In Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier, 1–19. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakassis, Constantine V.
2018 “Indexicality’s Ambivalent Ground.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 281–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A., and Dennis Richard Preston
2000Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 2000 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nørreby, Thomas. R.
2015 “Ethnic identifications in late modern Copenhagen.” In Everyday Languaging. Collaborative Research on the Language Use of Children and Youth, ed. by Lian Malai Madsen, Martha Sif Karrebæk, and Janus Spindler Møller, 199–218. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1992 “Indexing gender.” In Rethinking context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard
1994Signs in Society. Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Paunonen, Heikki
1995 (1982)Suomen kieli Helsingissä. Huomioita Helsingin puhekielen taustasta ja nykyvariaatiosta. [Finnish in Helsinki. Observations on the history and current variation of the spoken language in Helsinki.] Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen laitos.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia
2008 “Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice.” International Journal of Bilingualism 12 (1–2): 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Denmark: Danish urban contact dialects.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 186–205. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben
2006Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2007 “Mind style twenty-five years on.” Style 41 (2): 135–173.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976 “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith Basso and Ellen Selby, 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
1979 “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1985 “Language and the culture of gender.” In Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, ed. by Elisabeth Mertz and Richard J. Parmentier, 219–259. Orlando: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough?” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer and Luzio di Aldo, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Reflexive l Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language & Communication 23: 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15 (1): 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023Language in Culture. Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snell, Julia
2010 “From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylization.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (5): 630–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin
2022 “Norway: Contemporary urban speech styles.” In Urban Contact Dialects and Language Change, ed. by Paul Kerswill and Heike Wiese, 206–222. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Johanna
2012 “Rakenne, tilanne ja kohteliaisuus. Pyynnöt S2-oppikirjoissa ja autenttisissa keskusteluissa”. [Structure, situation and politeness. Requests in Finnish as a second language textbooks and authentic conversations.] PhD Dissertation, University of Helsinki. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10138​/32474
Urban, Greg
2001Metaculture. How Culture Moves through the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Visakko, Tomi
2015Self-promotion as Semiotic Behaviour. The Mediation of Personhood in Light of Finnish Online Dating Advertisements. Phd Dissertation, University of Helsinki. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10138​/156288
Woolard, Kathryn A.
2008 “Why dat now?: Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 432–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar