Taking into account Morris’ classic tripartite division of semiotics into syntax, semantics and pragmatics, it may be convincingly argued that, in the twentieth century, literary research has undergone a fundamental shift in orientation, from a basically text-oriented (i.e. syntactic and semantic) towards a more context-oriented (i.e. pragmatic) approach. This global ‘pragmatic turn’ may be discerned first of all in a number of theoretical and methodological studies, in which considerable stress is laid on so-called ‘extrinsic’ factors, such as literary institutions (publishing houses, libraries, periodicals, etc.), ideological influences on literature, or the specific cognitive and emotional abilities of particular readers. Moreover, a similar attention to the contextual embedding of literary phenomena is currently displayed in the concrete historical analysis of particular corpora and cultural phenomena as well.
References
Angenot, M.
19891889. Un état du discours social. Ed.du Préambule.
Austin, J. L.
1962How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M.
1984Esthétique de la création verbale. Gallimard.
Derrida, J.
1988Limited Inc.Northwestern University Press.
Easthope, A.
1983Poetry as discourse. Methuen.
Eco, U.
1976A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Felman, S.
1983The literary speech act. Cornell University Press.
Fokkema, D. & E. Kunne-Ibsch
1977Theories of literature in the twentieth century. C. Hurst & Company.
Fowler, R.
1981Literature as social discourse. Batsford.
Gadamer, H-G.
1965Truth and method. Sheed & Ward.
Groupe, Mu
1970Rhétorique générale. Seuil.
Holland, N.
1968The dynamics of literary response. Oxford University Press.
Holland, N.
19755 readers reading. Yale University Press.
Ibsch, E., D. Schram & G. Steen
1991Empirical studies of literature. Rodopi.
Ingarden, R.
1931The literary work of art (1973 ed.). Northwestern University Press.
Ingarden, R.
1937The cognition of the literary work of art (1973 ed.). Northwestern University Press.
Iser, W.
1970Die Appellstruktur der Texte. Universitätsverlag.
Iser, W.
1976The act of reading. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Iser, W.
1993The fictive and the imaginary. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jauss, H. R.
1967Toward an aesthetic of reception. University of Minnesota Press.
Jefferson, A. & D. Robey
1982Modern literary theory. Batsford.
Leech, G.
1969A linguistic guide to poetry. Longman.
Ohmann, R.
1971Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4: 1–19.
Ohmann, R.
1973Literature as act. In S. Chatman (ed.) Approaches to poetics. Columbia University Press.
Perron, P. & F. Collins
1989Paris school semiotics 2 vols. John Benjamins.
Petry, S.
1990Speech acts and literary theory. Routledge.
Pratt, M-L.
1977Toward a speech-act theory of literary discourse. Indiana University Press.
Propp, V.
1928Morphology of the folk tale. University of Texas Press.
Schmidt, S.
1989Die Selbstorganisation des Sozialsystems Literatur im 18. Jahrhundert. Suhrkamp.
Schmidt, S.
1993Literaturwissenschaft und Systemtheorie. Westdeutscher Verlag.