Posthumanism and pragmatics

Leonie Cornips, Ana DeumertAlastair Pennycook
Table of contents

Posthumanism, simply put, shifts the focus of research and politics away from humans; like Chakrabarty’s (2000) call to ‘provincialize Europe’, it pushes humans to the margins. The challenges posed by human destructiveness, environmental degradation, climate change, population growth, resource scarcity, urbanization, diminishing resources, our treatment of animals, as well as major shifts in technology and communication present a range of ethical and political concerns to which posthumanism responds by decentring the human. While there are many strands to this thinking, for pragmatics it raises a central question: What would the pragmatics of communication look like if humans are either peripheral or even absent from the communication? Put another way, how can we understand communication if we decentre human language as commonly conceived, and instead look at humans and other animals, animals and other animals, humans and machines, machines and machines, animals and machines, and any of these in relation to other possible actants — plants, rocks, spirits, rivers, or forests? If pragmatics has always assumed human actors as central to its endeavour, what does this mean if humans and their language are provincialized? What might a more-than-human pragmatics start to look like? To pursue this, we will look firstly at the background of posthumanist thought and why it matters, and then focus on general issues for communication from this perspective, including ideas such as distributed language and communication.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bennett, Jane
2010Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi
2022Posthuman Feminism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Brigstocke, Julian, and Tehseen Noorani
2016 “Posthuman attunements: Aesthetics, authority and the arts of creative listening.” GeoHumanities 2 (1): 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2016 “Embodied sociolinguistics.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, ed. by N. Coupland, 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh
2013Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, Isabelle, Anna Tsing, and Yen-Ling Tsai
2021 “Attunements.” Fieldsights, September 14. https://​culanth​.org​/fieldsights​/attunements
Cardeña, Etzel, Steven J. Lynn, and Stanley Krippner
2017 “The psychology of anomalous experiences: A rediscovery.” Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 4: 4–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Césaire, Aimé
1955Discours sur le colonialisme. Paris: Présence Africaine.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh
2000Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, and Louis van den Hengel
2021 “Place-making by cows in an intensive dairy farm: A sociolinguistic approach to nonhuman animal agency.” In Animals in Our Midst: The Challenges of Co-existing with Animals in the Anthropocene, ed. by Bernice Bovenkerk and Jozef Keulartz, 177–201. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, and Marjo van Koppen
2024 “Multimodal dairy cow — Human interaction in an intensive farming context.” Language Sciences 101: 101587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, Marjo van Koppen, Sterre Leufkens, Kristine Melum Eide, and Ronja van Zijverden
2023 “A linguistic-pragmatic analysis of cat-induced deixis in cat-human interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 217: 52–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie
2019 “The final frontier: Non-human animals on the linguistic research agenda.” In Linguistic in the Netherlands 36 (1): 13–19, ed. by Janine Berns and Elena Tribushinina. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2022 “The animal turn in postcolonial (socio)linguistics: The interspecies greeting of the dairy cow.” Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics 6: 210–232.Google Scholar
2024 “How (dairy) cows and human intertwine languaging practices: Recurrent vocalizations are not the same.” In Language as an ecological phenomenon. Languaging and bioecologies in human-environment relationships, ed. by Sune Vork Steffensen, Martin Döring, and Stephen Cowley. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crapanzano, Vincent
1980Tuhami. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dargie, David
1991 “Umngqokolo: Xhosa overtone singing and the song Nondel’ekhaya.” African Music: Journal of the International Library of African Music 7: 33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuro, Eugenia, and Laura Gurney
2021 “Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language.” Language Sciences 83: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1994Spectres of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Malsche, Fien, and Leonie Cornips
2021 “Examining interspecies interaction in light of discourse analytic theory: A case study on the genre of human-goat communication at a petting farm.” Language and Communication 79: 53–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Rijk, Lynn, and Leonie Cornips
2024 “The detailed work of negotiating play: Studying pig interaction using conversation analysis.” Interaction Studies, to appear.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana, and Anne Storch
2020 “Introduction: Colonial linguistics — Then and now.” In Colonial and Decolonial Linguistics: Knowledges and Epistemes, ed. by Ana Deumert, Anne Storch, and Nick Shepherd, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, Ana
2022 “The sound of absent-presence: Towards formulating a sociolinguistics of the spectre.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 45 (2): 135–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feld, Steven, Meghanne Barker, and Constantine V. Nakassis
Fricke, Ellen
2013Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: a multimodal approach. Body — Language — Communication ed. by Cornelia Müller, Jana Bressem, Silva H. Ladewig. Berlin: De Gruyter. Pp 733–754. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fröhlich, Marlen, Kuchenbuch, Paul, Müller, Gudrun, Fruth, Barbara, Furuichi, Takeshi, Wittig, Roman M., & Pika, Simone
2016Unpeeling the layers of language: Bonobos and chimpanzees engage in cooperative turn-taking sequences. Scientific Reports, 6 (1), 25887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genty, Emilie, Heesen, Raphaela, Guéry, Jean-Pascal, Rossano, Frederico, Zuberbühler, Klaus, & Bangerter, Adrian
2020How apes get into and out of joint actions: Shared intentionality as an interactional achievement. Interaction Studies, 21 (3), 353–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip
2022 “Does consciousness pervade the universe?Scientific American, Special Edition 31: 124.Google Scholar
Good, Byron J., Andrea Chiovenda, and Sadeq Rahimi
2022 “The anthropology of being haunted: On the emergence of an anthropological hauntology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 52: 437–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2017Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harjunpää, Katariina
2022 “Repetition and prosodic matching in responding to pets’ vocalizations.” Langage & Société 176 (2): 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillman, James, and Sonu Shamdasani
2013Lament of the Death: Psychology of Jung’s Red Book. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen
2017The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huberman, Jennifer
2021Transhumanism: From Ancestors to Avatars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Tamlyn
2018 “The Hippies were right: It’s all about vibrations, man! A new theory of consciousness.” Scientific American. https://​blogs​.scientificamerican​.com​/observations​/the​-hippies​-were​-right​-its​-all​-about​-vibrations​-man/
Jackson, Zakiyyah Iman
2013 “Animal: New directions in the theorization of race and posthumanism.” Feminist Studies 39 (3): 669–685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Becoming Human. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
James, William
1917The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don
2017 “Human-animal communication.” Annual Review of Anthropology 46: 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, Annika, Lisa Bauer, Andreas Futschik, Susanne Waiblinger & Stephanie Lürzel
2020Talking to cows: Reactions to different auditory stimuli during gentle human-animal interactions. Frontiers in psychology 11, Article 579346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Gavin Mitchell, and Christina Higgins
2020 “Posthumanism and its implications for discourse studies.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ed. by Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 350–370. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, Gavin Mitchell
2019 “Towards a green applied linguistics: Human-sea turtle semiotic assemblages in Hawai’i.” Applied Linguistics 2019 (0/0): 1–26.Google Scholar
2024Multispecies Discourse Analysis: The Nexus of Discourse and Practice in Sea Turtle Tourism and Conservation. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambek, Michael
1981Human Spirits: A Cultural Account of Trance in Mayotte. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Elsa, Clayton McClintock, Marianna Graziosi, Ashrita Nakkana, Albert Garcia, and Lisa Miller
2020 “Content analysis of spiritual life in contemporary USA, India, and China.” Religions 11: 286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, John, and Annemarie Mol
2008 “The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001.” In Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, ed. by Carl Knappett and Lambros Malafouris, 57–78. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, John
2007 “Making a mess with method.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology, ed. by William Outhwaite and Stephen P. Turner, 595–606. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Nicole, Deanna Haami, Natasha Tassell-Matamua, Pikihuia Pomare, Hukarere Valentine, John Pahina, Felicity Ware, and Paris Pidduck
2022 “The spiritual experiences of contemporary Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand: A qualitative analysis.” Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health 24: 74–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKian, Sara
2011 “Crossing spiritual boundaries: Encountering, articulating and representing otherworlds.” Methodological Innovations Online 6: 61–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandic, Danilo
2023 “Introduction.” In Hear, ed. by Danilo Mandic, Caterina Nirta, Andrea Pavoni, and Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, 1–11. Law and the Senses Series. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McComb, Karen, Anna M. Taylor, Christian Wilson, and Benjamin D. Charlton
2009 “The cry embedded within the purr.” Current Biology 19 (13): R507–R508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meijer, Eva
2019When Animals Speak: Toward an Interspecies Democracy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Robert
2001 “Americans’ talk to dogs: Similarities and differences with talk to infants.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 34 (2): 183–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mndende, Nokuzola
2002Signifying Practices: AmaXhosa Ritual Speech. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.
Mondada, Lorenza, and Adrien Meguerditchian
2022 “Sequence organization and embodied mutual orientations: Openings of social interactions between baboons.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 377 (1859): 20210101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2016 “Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondémé, Chloé
2011 “Animals as subject matter for social sciences: When linguistics addresses the issue of a dog’s ‘speakership’.” In Non-Humans in Social Science: Animals, Spaces, Things, ed. by Petr Gibas, Katerina Pauknerová, and Marco Stella, 87–105. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.Google Scholar
2018 “How do we talk to animals? Modes and pragmatic effects of communication with pets.” Langage et Société 163 (1): 77–99.Google Scholar
2022 “Why study turn-taking sequences in interspecies interactions?Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 52 (1): 67–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 “Gaze in interspecies human–pet interaction: Some exploratory analyses.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 56 (4): 291–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monteiro de Barros, Maria Cristina, Frederico Camelo Leão, Homero Vallada Filho, Giancarlo Lucchetti, Alexander Moreira-Almeida, and Mario Fernando Prieto Peres
2022 “Prevalence of spiritual and religious experiences in the general population: A Brazilian nationwide study.” Transcultural Psychiatry. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motta, Marco
2022 “The fragility of voice: Hosting spirits in urban Zanzibar.” Current Anthropology 63: 270–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neale, Margo
2021 “First knowledges: An introduction.” In Country: Future Fire, Future Farming, ed. by Bruce Pascoe, Bill Gammage, and Margo Neale, 11–14. First Knowledges Volume 2. Melbourne: Thames and Hudson Australia.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Jenny, and Stefan Norrthon
2024 “Opening interspecies encounters — Greetings between humans and nonhuman animals.” Journal of Pragmatics. 229:40–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opler, Morris E.
1958 “Spirit possession in a rural area of north India.” In Reader in Comparative Religion, ed. by William A. Lessa and Evon Z. Vogt, 553–566. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Otsuji, Emi, and Alastair Pennycook
2024 “Reassembling meaning while shopping.” In Multimodality and Social Interaction in Online and Offline Shopping, ed. by Gitte Rasmussen and Theo Van Leeuwen, 85–103. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pablé, Adrian
2022 “Linguistics for the apocalypse.” Language & Communication 86: 104–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parola, Alberto, Ilaria Gabbatore, Laura Berardinelli, Rogerio Salvini, and Francesca M. Bosco
2021 “Multimodal assessment of communicative-pragmatic features in schizophrenia: a machine learning approach.” npj Schizophrenia 7(28): 1–9.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Helena
2014 “Knowledge production in the ‘animal turn’: Multiplying the image of thought, empathy and justice.” In Exploring the Animal Turn: Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Culture, ed. by Erika Andersson Cederholm, Amelie Björck, Kristina Jennbert, and Ann-Sofie Lönngren, 13–18. Lund: Pufendorfinstitutet.Google Scholar
Pels, Peter
2003 “Introduction: Magic and modernity.” In Magic and Modernity: Interfaces of Revelation and Concealment, ed. by Birgit Meyer and Peter Pels. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Magic.” In Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, ed. by Michael Kelly, 233–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair, and Emi Otsuji
2015 “Making scents of the landscape.” Linguistic Landscape 1 (3): 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
2018Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2020 “Translingual entanglements of English.” World Englishes 39 (2): 222–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramshaw, Sara
2023 “The song and silence of the sirens.” In Hear, ed. by Danilo Mandic, Caterina Nirta, Andrea Pavoni, and Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, 87–142. Law and the Senses Series. London: University of Westminster Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossano, Frederico
2013Sequence organization and timing of bonobo mother-infant interactions. Interaction Studies, 14 (2), 160–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonen, Mika, and Hannes Lohi
2021 “Interactional reciprocity in human-dog interaction.” In Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Perakyla, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 397–428. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonen, Mika
2023 “Dogs responding to human utterances in embodied ways.” Journal of Pragmatics 217: 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Vanessa, and Jeffery A. Tolbert
2018 “Beyond metaphorical spectrality: For new paranormal geographies.” New Directions in Folklore 16: 27–57.Google Scholar
Stoller, Paul
1989Fusion of the World: An Ethnography of Possession Among the Songhay of Niger. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2023 “Designing talk for humans and horses: Prosody as a resource for parallel recipient design.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 56 (2): 89–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2004 “Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (4): 399–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah, and William Poser
2020 “Fantastic linguistics.” Annual Review of Linguistics 6 : 457–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topa, Wahinkpe (Four Arrows), and Darcia Narvaez
(eds) 2022Restoring the Kinship Worldview: Indigenous Voices Introduce 28 Precepts for Rebalancing Life on Earth. Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt
2013 “More-than-Human Sociality.” In Anthropology and Nature, edited by K. Hastrup, 27–42. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2015The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey & Ursula Münster
2016Multispecies studies. Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental humanities 8(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wynter, Sylvia
2003 “Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Toward the human, after man, its overrepresentation — An argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review 3 (3): 257–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yaden, David B., and Andrew B. Newberg
2022The Varieties of Spiritual Experience: 21st Century Research and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar