Stylistics

Elena SeminoJonathan Culpeper
Table of contents

Broadly speaking, stylistics is the study of style in language (e.g. Verdonk 2002: 3–4). Its focus is the way in which language varies under the influence of factors such as context, purpose, author and period. Traditionally, however, stylistics has tended to privilege texts that are valued for their artistic merit, i.e. literary works. It is indeed quite common for stylistics to be defined as the linguistic study of literature (e.g. ­Freeman 1981: 3; Simpson 1993: 3). Following Leech (1985), we will distinguish between literary stylistics and general stylistics.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Adamson, S.
1989.With double tongue. In M. Short (ed.): 204–240. Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. & M. Short
1989Reading literature. In M. Short (ed.): 72–119. Google Scholar
Bally, C.
1909Traité de stylistique française. Carl Winters. Google Scholar
Banfield, A.
1982Unspeakable sentences. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & S. Conrad
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birch, D.
1991The language of drama. Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birch, D. & M. O’toole
(eds.) 1988Functions of style. Pinter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, E.
1993Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s ‘The inheritors’. Language and Literature 2: 37–48. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & A. Gilman
1989Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18: 159–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. & R. Carter
(eds.) 1986Literature and language teaching. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton, D.
1980Dialogue and discourse. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
1982Through glass darkly: through dark glasses. In R. Carter (ed.): 195–214. Google Scholar
Carter, R.
1989Directions in the teaching and study of English stylistics. In M. Short (ed.): 10–21. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1982Language and literature. Allen & Unwin. Google Scholar
Carter, R. & W. Nash
1990Seeing through language. Blackwell. Google Scholar
Carter, R. & P. Simpson
(eds.) 1989Language, discourse and literature. Unwin Hyman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, G.
1994Discourse and literature: the interplay of form and mind. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & D. Davy
1969Investigating English style. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J.
1975Structuralist poetics. Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
2002Computers, language and characterisation: An Analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. In U. Melander-Marttala, C. Östman & M. Kytö (eds.), Conversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium, Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee(ASLA), 15. Uppsala. Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A.
(ed.) 1976Pragmatics of language and literature. North-Holland. Google Scholar
Dillon, G.
1978Language processing and the reading of literature. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Emmott, C.
1997Narrative comprehension: a discourse perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, N. E.
1964On defining style. In N. E. Enkvist, J. Spencer & M. Gregory (eds.) Linguistics and style: 1–56. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
1973Linguistic stylistics. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Styles as parameters in text strategy. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 125–151. Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1989Language and power. Longman. Google Scholar
Fairley, I. R.
1988The reader’s need for conventions. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 292–316. Google Scholar
Fish, S.
1980Is there a text in this class?Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Fowler, R.
1977Linguistics and the novel. Methuen. Google Scholar
1986Linguistic criticism. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
1989Polyphony in ‘Hard times’. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 77–93. Google Scholar
Fowler, R., R. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew
1979Language and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Freeman, D. C.
(ed.) 1981Essays in modern stylistics. Methuen. Google Scholar
1993‘According to my bond’: King Lear and recognition. Language and Literature 2: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999‘The rack dislimns’: schema and metaphorical pattern in Anthony and Cleopatra. ­Poetics Today 20: 443–60. Google Scholar
Gavins, J.
2007Text World Theory: An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geyer-Ryan, H.
1988Heteroglossia in the poetry of Bertolt Brecht and Tony Harrison. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 193–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guiraud, P.
1954La stylistique. PUF. Google Scholar
Halle, M. & S. J. Keyser
1966Chaucer and the study of poetry. College English 28: 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1971Linguistic function and literary style: and inquiry into the language of William Golding’s ‘The inheritors’. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary style: 330–365. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
1978Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
1985An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold. Google Scholar
Hasan, R.
1989Linguistics, language and verbal art. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hayes, C. W.
1966A study of prose styles. Texas Studies in Literature and Language 7: 371–386. Google Scholar
Haynes, J.
1989Metre and discourse. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 235–256. Google Scholar
Herman, V.
1991Dramatic dialogue and the systematics of turn-taking. Semiotica 83: 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, L.
(ed.) 1989The pragmatics of style. Routledge. Google Scholar
Hoover, D. L.
1999Language and style in ‘The Inheritors’. University Press of America. Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1960Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language: 350–377. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. & L. G. Jones
1970Shakespeare’s verbal art in ‘Th’expense of spirit’. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakbobson, R. & C. Lévi-Strauss
1962‘Les chats’ de Baudelaire. L’Homme 2: 5–21. Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.
1982Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In R. Carter (ed.): 83–99. Google Scholar
Lambrou, M. & Stockwell, P.
(eds) 2007Contemporary Stylistics. Routledge. Google Scholar
Leech, G. N.
1965‘This bread I Break’: language and interpretation. Review of English Literature 6: 66–75. Google Scholar
1969A linguistic guide to English poetry. Longman. Google Scholar
1985Stylistics. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and literature: 39–57. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.N
1992Pragmatic principles in Shaw’s ‘You never can tell’. In M. Toolan (ed.): 259–280. Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. & M. H. Short
[1981] (2007) Style in fiction,2nd edition . Longman. Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M.
2007Great Expectations. In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (eds.) Contemporary Stylistics. Routledge. Google Scholar
Milic, L. T.
1967A quantitative approach to the style of Jonathan Swift. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, S.
1995Feminist stylistics. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukařovský, J.
1964Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (ed.) A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure and style : 17–30. Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
Nash, W.
1989Changing the guard at Elsinore. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 23–41. Google Scholar
Ohmann, R.
1964Generative grammars and the concept of literary style. Word 20: 423–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1971Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4: 1–19. Google Scholar
O’toole, M.
1988Henry Reed, and what follows the ‘Naming of parts’. In D. Birch & M. O’toole (eds.): 12–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W.
1986Stylistics and psychology. Croom Helm. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1988The taming of the text. Routledge. Google Scholar
Pilkington, A.
2000Poetic effects: a relevance theory perspective.Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. L.
1977Towards a speech act theory of literary discourse. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
1988Conventions of representation. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 15–34. Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M.
1959. Criteria for style analysis. Word 15: 154–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966Describing poetic structures. Yale French Studies 36/37: 200–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
1997Language and world creation in poems and other texts. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Culpeper, J.
(eds.) 2002Cognitive stylistics: language and cognition in text analysis.Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M.
2004Corpus stylistics: speech, writing and thought Presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, M. H.
1973Linguistic criticism and Baudelaire’s ‘Les chats’. Journal of Literary Semantics 2: 79–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988Speech presentation, the novel and the press. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 61–81. Google Scholar
1989Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 139–168. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1989Reading, analysing & teaching literature. Longman. Google Scholar
Short, M. & W. Van Peer
1989Accident! Stylisticians evaluate. In M. Short (ed.): 22–71. Google Scholar
Simpson, P.
1989Politeness phenomena in Ionesco’s ‘The Lesson’. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 171–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L.
1948Linguistics and literary history. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Stockwell, P.
2002Cognitive poetics: an introduction. Routledge. Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P.
1965Stylistics and generative grammars. Journal of Linguistics 1: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M.
1988Compromising positions. In D. Birch & M. O’toole (eds.): 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990The stylistics of fiction. Routledge. Google Scholar
1992Language, text and context. Routledge. Google Scholar
2001Narrative: a critical linguistic introduction,2nd edition . Routledge. Google Scholar
2009Narrative progression in the short story: a corpus stylistic approach. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & M. L. Pratt
1980Linguistics for students of literature. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar
Trengove, G.
1989‘Vers de Société’: towards some society. In M. Short (ed.): 146–160. Google Scholar
Verdonk, P.
2002Stylistics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Wales, K.
1988Back to the future. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 176–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001A dictionary of stylistics,2nd edition . Longman. Google Scholar
Weber, J. J.
1992Critical analysis of fiction. Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P.
1999Text worlds: representing conceptual space in discourse. Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G.
1975Stylistics and the teaching of literature. Longman. Google Scholar
1992Practical stylistics. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Wilson, A. & G. N. Leech
1993Automatic content analysis and the stylistic analysis of prose literature. Revue Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines 29: 219–234. Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
1993Aspects of literary comprehension. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Related articles: Communicative style, Discourse analysis, Emphasis, Figures of speech, Literary pragmatics, Vilém Mathesius, Rhetoric, Text linguistics