Taxonomy

Robert E. MacLaury
Table of contents

Taxonomy, in the present context, is largely an anthropological linguistic interest in categorization. It affords a fluid interface with psychologists, linguists, anthropologists, and other specialists concerned with the crosscultural comparison of ways that lexically labelled categories are internally organized and related to each other within a domain. Certain linguistic anthropologists have specialized in one or another of the ubiquitous domains, such as plant classification or color terms (Berlin 1992; MacLaury 1995), where they have established replicable elicitation procedures, demonstrated widely recurrent patterns among categories, proposed models of processes and systems that may explain the patterns, and attempted to test the models for cognitive validity. The domain-specific concentrations have brought methodology to the forefront of taxonomy, setting it apart from non-numerical approaches to categorization (Lakoff 1987; Turner 1967; Lévi-Strauss 1966). Other rubrics of the method-oriented program are ethnoscience (Sturtevant 1964), ethnographic semantics (Colby 1966), and folk classification (Conklin 1972). Taxonomy fits under the umbrella of cognitive anthropology, which highlights additional processes, such as decision making (Young & Garro 1994), that need not be linguistic.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bartlett, H. H.
1928 Color nomenclature in Batak and Malay. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 10: 1–52. Google Scholar
1940 The concept of genus. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67(5): 349–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, A. L.
1975 A linguistic image of nature. Linguistics 165: 109–121. Google Scholar
Berlin, B.
1968 Tzeltal numeral classifiers. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Ethnobiological classification. Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. & E. A. Berlin
1975 Aguaruna color categories. American Ethnologist 2: 61–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B., J. S. Boster & J. P. O’niel
1981 The perceptual bases of ethnobiological classification. Ethnobiology 1: 95–108. Google Scholar
Berlin, B., D. Breedlove & P. H. Raven
1973 General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75: 214–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, B. & P. Kay
1969 Basic color terms. University of California Press. Google Scholar
Black, M.
1969 Eliciting folk taxonomies in Ojibwa. In TylerS. A. (ed.). 165–189. Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1933 Language. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Boas, F.
1881 Beiträge zur Erkenntniss der Farbe des Wassers. Doctoral Diss., University of Kiel. Google Scholar
Bright, J. O. & W. Bright
1965 Semantic structures in Northwestern California and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. American Anthropologist 67: 249–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & E. H. Lenneberg
1954 A study in language and cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 454–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, D., W. Kempton & R. E. Maclaury
1983 Tarahumara color modifiers. American Ethnologist 10: 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burling, R.
1964 Cognition and componential analysis. American Anthropologist 66: 20–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970 Man’s many voices. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Casagrande, J. B. & K. L. Hale
1967 Semantic relations in Papago folk-definitions. In HymesD. & W. E. Bittle (eds.). Studies in Southwestern ethnolinguistics: 165–196. Mouton. Google Scholar
Colby, B. N.
1966 Ethnographic semantics. Current Anthropology 7: 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conklin, H. C.
1954 The relation of Hanunòo culture to the plant world. PhD. Diss. Yale University. Google Scholar
1955 Hanunòo color categories. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11: 339–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1962 Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In F. W. Householder & S. Saporta (eds.) Problems in lexicography: 119–141. Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics. [Reprinted in S. E. Tyler (ed.): 41–59.]Google Scholar
1972 Folk classification. Yale University Dept. of Anthropology. Google Scholar
1973 Color categorization (review of Berlin and Kay 1969). American Anthropologist 75: 931–942. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De León, L.
1992 Body parts and location in Tzotzil. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45: 570–589. Google Scholar
De Valois, R. L. & I. Abramov
1966 Color vision. Annual Review of Psychology 17: 337–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, J. W. D.
1975 A universalist analysis of variation and change in color semantics. PhD. Diss., University of California. Google Scholar
1978 Salience and relativity in classification. American Ethnologist 5: 66–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frake, C. O.
1961 The diagnosis of disease among the Subanun. American Anthropologist 63: 11–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geddes, W. R.
1946 The color sense of Fijian natives. British Journal of Psychology, General 37: 30–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A.
1961 An introduction to descriptive linguistics. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Goodenough, W.
1964 Componential analysis of Könkämä Lapp kinship terminology. In GoodenoughW. (ed.). 221–238. Google Scholar
(ed.) 1964 Explorations in cultural anthropology. Holt, Rhinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Hage, P. & K. Hawkes
1975 Binumarien color categories. Ethnology 24: 287–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hage, P., K. Hawkes & W. Miller
1976 ‘Eagle’=‘bird’. American Ethnologist 3: 481–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hays, T. E.
1976 An empirical method for the identification of covert categories in ethnobotany. American Ethnologist 3: 489–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heider, E. Rosch
1972 Probabilities sampling, and ethnographic method. Man 7: 448–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, A. C.
1974 Colour classification of some Central Canadian Eskimos. Arctic Anthropology 11: 68–72. Google Scholar
Hickerson, N.
1971 Review of Berlin and Kay (1969). International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 257–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L.
1953 Prologomena to a theory of language. Waverly Press. Google Scholar
Hunn, E.
1982 The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist 84: 830–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunn, E. & D. French
1984 Alternatives to taxonomic hierarchy. Ethnobiology 3: 73–92. Google Scholar
Kay, P.
1966 Comments on Colby. Appended to Colby [Reprinted in S.E. Tyler (ed.): 78–90.] (1966): 20–23. Google Scholar
1975 Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms. Language in Society 4: 257–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. & C. Mcdaniel
1978 The linguistic significance of basic color terms. Language 54: 610–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuschel, R. & T. Monberg
1974 ‘We don’t talk much about colour here’. Man 9: 213–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. B.
1979 The !Kung San. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. & J. H. Roberts
1956 The language of experience. International Journal of American Linguistics 22: 2(Memoir 13). Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C.
1966 The savage mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. G.
1964 A formal analysis of the Crow and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In GoodenoughW. (ed.). 351–93. Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A.
1992 Language diversity and thought. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maclaury, R. E.
1991 Social and cognitive motivations of change. Language 67: 34–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 From brightness to hue. Current Anthropology 33: 137–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Color and cognition in Mesoamerican languages. University of Texas Press. Google Scholar
Pike, K. L.
1967 Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ray, V. F.
1953 Human color perception and behavioral response. New York Academy of Sciences(series 2) 16: 98–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. H.
1973 On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In MooreT. E. (ed.). Cognitive development and the acquisition of language: 111–144. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Principles of categorization. In RoschE. & B. B. Lloyd (eds.). Cognition and categorization: 28–48. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Rosch, E., C. B. Mervis & W. D. Gray & D. M. Johnson & P. Boyes-Braem
1976 Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8: 382–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M.
1976 Colors and cultures. Semiotica 16: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stross, B.
1973 Acquisition of botanical terminology by Tzeltal children. In DemonsonM. S. (ed.). Meaning and Mayan languages: 107–141. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sturtevant, W. C.
1964 Studies in ethnoscience. In A. K. Romney & R. G. D’andrade (eds.) Transcultural studies in cognition: 99–113. Special issue of American Anthropologist 66(3). Google Scholar
Tornay, S.
(ed.) 1978 Voir et nommer les couleurs. Laboratoire d’Ethnologie et de Sociologie Comparative. Google Scholar
Turner, V. W.
1967 The forest of symbols. Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Tyler, S. A.
(ed.) 1969 Cognitive anthropology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Google Scholar
Van Brakel, J. & B. A. C. Saunders
1996 Colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences18. Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1993 Semantic primitives and semantic fields. In LehrerA. & E. F. Kittay (eds.). Frames, fields, and contrasts: 209–227. Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Young, J. C. & L. C. Garro
1994 Medical choice in a Mexican village. Waveland Press. Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A.
1965 Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, H.
1972 Human color vision as an interdisciplinary research problem. Palette 40: 1–7. Google Scholar