Tense and aspect

Robert I. Binnick
Table of contents

All languages contain grammatical markers of tense and/or aspect (MTAs). Linguists who analyze tense and aspect from a functional point of view may define the meanings of MTAs in cognitive terms (Janssen 1996) or in terms of their discourse functions (Benveniste 1959; Weinrich 1964; Waugh 1975, 1991; Hopper 1979, 1982), and do not necessarily view their use and interpretation as dependent in the first instance on their semantics, as do the majority of linguists studying tense and aspect, who adopt a formal point of view from which tense and aspect are seen as basically referential categories.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Benveniste, E.
1959 Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 54: 69–82.Google Scholar
Boogaart, R.
1999 Aspect and temporal ordering: A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Carston, R.
1998 The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from relevance theory. Working Papers in Linguistics 10, University College London.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, S.
1990 Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. University of Texas Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1991 Toward a theory of tense-aspect in narrative discourse. In J. Gvozdanovic & T. Janssen (eds.). The function of tense in texts: 75–97. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Grosz, B.J., A.K. Joshi & S. Weinstein
1995 Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21: 203–25.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, E.
1986 Temporal anaphora in discourses in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 63–82.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hitzeman, J., M. Moens & C. Glover
1995 Algorithms for analyzing the temporal structure of discourse. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 253–60. University College, Dublin.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J.R.
1979 Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science 3: 67–90. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J.
1979 Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.). Discourse and syntax: 213–41. Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982 Aspect between discourse and grammar. In P.J. Hopper (ed.) Tense/Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics: 3–18. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, T.A.
1996 Deictic and anaphoric referencing of tenses. In W. De Mulder, L. Tasmowski-De Ryck & C. Vetters (eds.) Anaphores temporelles et (in-)cohérence: 79–107. Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kameyama, M., R. Passonneau & M. Poesio
1993 Temporal centering. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 70–77. Ohio State University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H.
1979 Events instants, and temporal reference. In R. Bäuerle, U. Egli & A. Von Stechow (eds.) Semantics from different points of view: 376–417. Springer Verlag. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & U. Reyle
1993 From discourse to logic. Kluwer.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & C. Rohrer
1983 Tense in Texts. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. Von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, use, and interpretation of language: 250–69. Walter de Gruyter.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A.
1994 Temporal relations: Reference or discourse coherence? In Proceedings of the 32nd Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Student Session): 319–321. New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A.
1992 Knowledge causality and temporal representation. Linguistics 30: 941–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lascarides, A. & N. Asher
1991 Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 55–62. University of California. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Temporal interpretation discourse relations and common sense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437–93. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lascarides, A. & J. Oberlander
1992 Abducing temporal discourse. In R Dale et al. (eds.), Aspects of automated natural language generation: 167–182. Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Temporal coherence and defeasible knowledge. Theoretical Linguistics 19: 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W.C. & S.A. Thompson
1988 Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moens, M. & M. Steedman
1987 Temporal ontology in natural language. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 1–7. Stanford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Journal of Computational Linguistics 14: 15–28.Google Scholar
Moeschler, J.
1998 Directional inferences and the conceptual/procedural encoding distinction. In Proceedings ot the Relevance Theory Workshop: 3–8. University of Luton.Google Scholar
2000 L’ordre temporel dans le discours: le modèle des inférences directionelles. In A. Carlier, V. Lagae & C. Benninger (eds.), Passé et parfait: 1–11. Rodopi.Google Scholar
Partee, B.H.
1973 Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–09. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, L.
1985 A theory of discourse structure and discourse coherence. In W. Eilfort, P. Kroeber & K. Peterson (eds.), Papers from the General Session at the 21st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: 25–27. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Scha, R. & L. Polanyi
1988 An augmented context free grammar. In D. Vargha (ed.), Coling Budapest: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: 573–77. John von Neumann Society for Computing Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell. (2nd ed. 1995.)  BoPGoogle Scholar
Steedman, M.
1997 Temporality. In J. Van Benthem & A. Ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics: 895–938. Elsevier North Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sthioul, B.
1998 Temps verbaux et point de vue. In J. Moeschler (ed.), Le Temps des événements: pragmatique de la référence temporelle: 197–220. Éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.A. & W. Mann
1987 Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 79–105.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, L.R.
1975 A semantic analysis of the French tense system. Orbis 24: 436–85.Google Scholar
1991 Tense-aspect and hierarchy of meanings: Pragmatic textual, modal, discourse, expressive, referential. In L. Waugh & S. Rudy (eds.), New vistas in grammar: 242–59. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, B.L.
1988 Tense as discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics 14: 61–73.Google Scholar
Weinrich, H.
1964 Tempus: Besprochene und erzählte Welt. W. Kohlhammer. (2nd ed. 1971.)Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1998 Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and implications: 1–22. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar