Text structure

Tuija Virtanen
Table of contents

Texts are expected to have structure and the study of that structure is a central concern in text and discourse linguistics. Texts are semantic units and their structure is therefore a matter of organization of the content material included in them. At the same time, text structure is also a matter of form, since texts manifest linguistic signals of various kinds whose purpose is to facilitate the text receiver’s task of interpretation, i.e. the task of building a text world around a given text. And even shape can be used to disclose the structure of a given text. Hence, the visual form of, say, a poem, instruction manual or horoscope conveys text-structural meaning, and the way international news readers structure the different news items prosodically gives the news shape and thus helps hearers process them.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Aijmer, K.
1996 Conversational routines in English: Convention and creativity. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
1980 Text, discourse, and process: Toward a multidisciplinary science of texts. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1997 New foundations for a science of text and discourse: Cognition, communication, and the freedom of access to knowledge and society. Ablex.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. & W. Dressler
1981 Introduction to text linguistics. Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988 Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
BjörklundM.
1993 Narrative strategies in Cechov’s The Steppe: Cohesion, grounding and point of view. Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar
BjörklundM. & T. Virtanen
1991 Variation in narrative structure: A simple text vs. an innovative work of art. Poetics 20(4): 391–403. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, G.
1995 Speakers, listeners and communication: Explorations in discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. & G. Yule
1983 Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Byrman, G.
1998 Tidningsnotisen i förändring 1746–1997. University of Lund.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
1982 Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (ed.) Spoken and written language: 35–53. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994 Discourse, consciousness, and time. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1980 The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Connor, U.
1996 Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Daneš, F.
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective: 106–128. Academia.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Enkvist, N.E.
1975 Tekstilingvistiikan peruskäsitteitä. Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
1984 Contrastive linguistics and text linguistics. In J. Fisiak (ed.). Contrastive linguistics, prospects and problems: 45–67. Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 A note towards the definition of text strategy. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 40(1): 19–27.Google Scholar
1989 Connexity, interpretability, universes of discourse, and text worlds. In S. Allén (ed.) Possible worlds in humanities, arts and sciences: 162–186. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1992 Discourse and social change. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J.
1994 Les particules énonciatives dans la construction du discours. Presses University de France.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. & D. Goutsos
1997 Discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(ed.) 1983 Topic continuity in discourse. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Granger, S.
(ed.) 1998 Learner language on computer. Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Grimes, J.E.
1975 The thread of discourse. Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1978 Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985 Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W.F.
1989 Text and textuality. Annual Review of Anthropology 18: 95–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, M.
1983 On the surface of discourse. George Allen & Unwin.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1991 Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995 The lexical nature of intertextuality: A preliminary study. In B. Wårvik, S-K. Tanskanen & R. Hiltunen (eds.) Organization in discourse: 73–94. University of Turku.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & S.A. Thompson
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(1–2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hovy, E.
1987 Generating natural language under pragmatic constraints. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 689–719. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D.
1996 Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. Taylor & Francis.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Källgren, G.
1979 Innehåll i text. Lund Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1972 The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English Vernacular: 354–396. The University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R.E.
1983 The grammar of discourse. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mann, W.C. & S.A. Thompson
1988 Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3): 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A.
1993 Cultural differences in academic rhetoric. Peter Lang.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mills, S.
1997 Discourse. Routledge. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.-O.
1982 The symbiotic relationship between pragmatic particles and impromptu speech. In N.E. Enkvist (ed.). Impromptu speech: 147–177. The Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. & B. Wårvik
1994 The ‘Fight at Finnsburh’ – Pragmatic aspects of a narrative fragment. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 95(2): 207–227.Google Scholar
Roulet, E., A. Auchlin & J. Moeschler & C. Rubattel & M. Schelling
1985 L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
1974 A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987 Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.M. & M. Coulthard
1975 Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A.
1980 Macrostructures. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1987 News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1997 Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. 2 vols. Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A. & W. Kintsch
1983 Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1985 International news reporting: Metapragmatic metaphors and the U-2. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, T.
1992 Discourse functions of adverbial placement in English: Clause-initial adverbials of time and place in narratives and procedural place descriptions. Åbo Akademi University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wårvik, B.
1987 On the history of grounding markers in English narrative: Style or typology? In Andersen, H. & K. Koerner (eds.) Historical Linguistics 1987: 531–542. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werlich, E.
1976 A text grammar of English. Heidelberg. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
White, H.
1980 The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry 7(1): 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R.
1996 Disorders of discourse. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar