Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity: Some comments on a proposal by Laurence Horn

Ad Foolen

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Atlas, Jay David
(1981) Is not logical? In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Symposion on multi-valued logic. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society Press, 124-128.Google Scholar
(1989) Philosophy without ambiguity: A logico-linguistic essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia
(1986) Sisterhood is more powerful than you thought: Scopal adverb placement and illocutionary force. In: CLS 22, Part 2, 40-53.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
(1989) The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
(1985) A reanalysis of some ‘quantity imlicatures’. University College, London.Google Scholar
(1988) Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In: Ruth Kempson (ed.) Mental representations: The interface between language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155-181.Google Scholar
Donnellan, K
(1966) Reference and definite descriptions. Philosphical Review 75, 281-304. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
197) Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann.
Grice, H. Paul
(1967) Logic and conversation. Unpublished. William James Lectures ad Harvard.
Horn, Laurence R
(1985) Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61:1, 121-174. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) A natural history of negation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
to appear) Negation. In: A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.) Handbuch der Semantik
Karttunen, L. & S. Peters
(1979) Conventional implicature. In: C.-K. Oh & D. Dinneen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1-56.Google Scholar
Kempson, R
(1986) Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In: C. Travis (ed.) Meaning and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 77-103.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
(1977) What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 337-355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Récanati, François
(1989) The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4:4, 295-329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
(1905) On denoting. Mind 14, 479-493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, P.A.M
(1976) Echo: Een studie in negatie. In: G. Koefoed & A. Evers (eds.) Lijnen van taaltheoretisch onderzoek. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink, 160-184.Google Scholar
(1985) Discourse semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1988) Presupposition and negation. In: Journal of Semantics 6: 3/4, 175-226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil
(1989) The twitter machine: Reflections on language. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
(1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van der Sandt, Rob
to appear) Denial and negation. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.
Wertheimer, R
(1972) The significance of sense: Meaning, modality, and morality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar