The development of EFL students’ speech fluency: A phase transition investigation based on a complex dynamic systems perspective
DonyMarzuki
Politeknik Negeri Padang
Abstract
This study investigated phase transitions in EFL students’ speech fluency development using a complex dynamic
systems perspective. Two students with different proficiency levels were selected from an intact speaking class. These students
learned and practiced specific strategies to improve their speech fluency. Phase transitions were analyzed based on three criteria:
sudden jumps, anomalous variance, and qualitative change in the attractor. Number of syllables was used as the speech fluency
measure. The results suggest that only the higher-proficiency student underwent one phase transition. These findings imply that a
short explicit fluency strategy training intervention could improve the speech fluency development of high-proficiency students in
EFL classrooms. The results have implications for theory and pedagogical practice relating to EFL students’ speech fluency
development.
Complex dynamic systems theory (CDST) views language as a complex system. It considers language as the product of emergent
assemblies of interconnected components that form a connected whole through interaction (Van
Geert, 2008). This system is constantly changing and is “hardly ever stable and cannot be characterized as predetermined
and linear” (Lowie & Verspoor, 2019). Although a system usually changes continuously in
a particular state, it can sometimes experience a radical or discontinuous change that causes the system to undergo reorganization
into a higher-level state, known as ‘emergence’ (Van Dijk & Van Geert, 2007). Emergence
is a general principle for explaining a developmental change in a CDST approach (Lewis,
2000). Emergence contains critical moments (phase transitions) in learners’ development that could explain what causes it
and how it emerges. Hence, “emergence is characterized by phase transition, or conversely, the phase transition is the change with
emergent properties” (Baba & Nitta, 2014, p. 5). Identifying phase transitions and
clarifying how the whole system operates around an emergence become the primary goal of research based on this approach (Baba & Nitta, 2014; Kelso, 1995).
References
Baba, K., & Nitta, R.
(2014) Phase
transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems
perspective. Language
Learning, 64(1), 1–35.
Bachman, L. F.
(1990) Fundamental
considerations in language testing: Oxford University
Press.
Butler, F. A., & Castellon-Wellington, M.
(2005) Students’
concurrent performance on tests of English language proficiency and academic
achievement. In The validity of administering large-scale content
assessments to English language learners: An investigation from three perspectives (CSE Report 663,
pp. 47–83). UCLA.
Diaz-Asper, M., Holmlund, T. B., Chandler, C., Diaz-Asper, C., Foltz, P. W., Cohen, A. S., & Elvevåg, B.
(2022) Using
automated syllable counting to detect missing information in speech transcripts from clinical
settings. Psychiatry
Research, 315.
Dong, J.
(2016) A
dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening
performance. System, 63, 149–165.
Evans, D. R.
(2019) Bifurcations,
fractals, and non-linearity in second language development: A complex dynamic systems
perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State
University of New York at Buffalo.
Fogal, G. G.
(2020) Investigating
variability in L2 development: Extending a complexity theory perspective on L2 writing studies and authorial
voice. Applied
linguistics, 41(4), 575–600.
Geveke, C. H., Steenbeek, H. W., Doornenbal, J. M., & Van
Geert, P. L.
(2017) Attractor
states in teaching and learning processes: A study of out-of-school science
education. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8, 299.
Gilmore, R.
(1993) Catastrophe
theory for scientists and engineers. Courier
Corporation.
Hepford, E. A.
(2017) Dynamic
second language development: The interaction of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in a naturalistic learning
context (Unpublished doctoral disseration). Temple
University.
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H.
(2016) A
dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. The
Modern Language
Journal, 100(4), 741–756.
Jansen, B. R., & Van
der
Maas, H. L.
(2001) Evidence
for the phase transition from Rule I to Rule II on the balance scale task. Developmental
Review, 21(4), 450–494.
Kelso, J. S.
(1995) Dynamic
patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. The MIT
press.
Krashen, S. D.
(1985) The
input hypothesis: Issues and implications: Addison-Wesley
Longman.
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) The
emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of
English. Applied
linguistics, 27(4), 590–619.
Lewis, M. D.
(2000) The
promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child
development, 71(1), 36–43.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2015) Variability
and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language
Learning, 65(1), 63–88.
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2019) Individual
differences and the ergodicity problem. Language
Learning, 69, 184–206.
Ruhland, R., & Van
Geert, P.
(1998) Jumping
into syntax: Transitions in the development of closed class words. British Journal of
Developmental
Psychology, 16(1), 65–95.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic
patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of
Finnish. Applied
linguistics, 31(4), 532–553.
Taylor, W. A.
(2000) Change-point
analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes. Taylor
Enterprises.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.
(1994) A
dynamic systems approach to the development of perception and action. The MIT
Press.
Thom, R.
(1975) Structural
stability and morphogenesis, trans. by D. H. Fowler. W.
A. Benjamin.
Van
Dijk, M., & Van
Geert, P.
(2007) Wobbles,
humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language
development. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and
Practice, 16(1), 7–33.
Van
Geert, P.
(2008) The
dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern
Language
Journal, 92(2), 179–199.
Van
Geert, P., Steenbeek, H., & Kunnen, S.
(2012) Monte
Carlo techniques: Statistical simulation for developmental data. In A
dynamic systems approach to adolescent
development (pp. 59–68). Psychology
Press.
Van
Geert, P., & Van
Dijk, M.
(2002) Focus
on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant
Behavior and
Development, 25(4), 340–374.
Verspoor, M., de
Bot, K., & Lowie, W.
(2011) A
dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. John
Benjamins.
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L.
(2017) Linguistic
complexity in second language development: Variability and variation at advanced
stages. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures. Les Cahiers de
l’Acedle, 14(14–1).
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van
Dijk, M.
(2008) Variability
in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language
Journal, 92(2), 214–231.
Yu, H., & Lowie, W.
(2020) Dynamic
paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: a longitudinal case study of Chinese
learners. Applied
linguistics, 41(6), 855–877.