Book review
Form and formalism in linguistics.. Ed. by James McElvenny (History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences 1).
Berlin: Language Science Press, 2019. viii, 270 pp. ISBN 978-3-96110-183-2 35 € http://langsci-press.org

Reviewed by Christopher Hutton
Table of contents

As the editor of Form and Formalism in Linguistics, James McElvenny, points out in the preface, the concept of ‘form’ is elusive and difficult: “The fecundity of ‘form’ is visible not only in its polysemy, but also in the family of derivatives it has brought into the world, including such terms as ‘formal’, ‘formalized’ and ‘formalist/formalism’” (p. iv). These labels “generally imply concentration on internal systematicity to the exclusion of external explanatory factors alongside an inclination to abstraction and axiomatization”, though ‘formalism’ can also refer to the representational notation used in the analysis of linguistic phenomena (iv). To this one might add that the question of what constitutes linguistic form will vary with the theoretical model, so in this sense it is not possible to give a theory-neutral definition of the term. The volume does not in any case pretend to be a comprehensive treatment of the notion of linguistic form. The authors share a concern with intellectual history, and for some contributors, though not all, this is a springboard for an intervention in the contemporary discipline.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Benveniste, Émile
1935Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Black, Paul
1973 “Multidimensional scaling applied to linguistic relationships”. Lexicostatistics in genetic linguistics II: Proceedings of the Montreal conference ed. by Isidore Dyen and Guy Jucquois, 2–78. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1889 “On alternating sounds”. American Anthropologist 2(1).47–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1974 “Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)”. Synthèse 28.97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975The language of thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Post, Emil L.
1921 “Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions”. American Journal of Mathematics 43.163–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Propp, Vladimir Y.
1968 [1928]Morphology of the folktale ed. by Louis A. Wagner. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1951Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality ed. by David G. Mandelbaum. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stokhof, Martin & Michiel van Lambalgen
2011 “Abstractions and idealisations: the construction of modern linguistics”. Theoretical Linguistics 37(1/2).1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tynjanov, Yuri & Roman O. Jakobson
1928 “Problemy izučenija literatury i jazyka”. Novyj Lef 12.35–37.Google Scholar