Otto Jespersen, one more broken leg in the historical stool of generative linguistics
GuillermoLorenzo
University of Oviedo
Summary
Over the years, Noam Chomsky has constructed a historiographic narrative according to which Generative Grammar is the outcome of a mix comprising the early awareness of creativity by Galileo, the Cartesians, and Humboldt, the formalization of recursive functions by computational theorists, and an incipient internalist ‘language’ concept notably foreshadowed by Otto Jespersen. This paper tries to show that the latter ingredient is to be removed from the historical recipe for Chomskyan linguistics. More specifically, the paper claims that the almost ritual repetition of the name of the Danish linguist belongs to a component of the generativist rhetoric that is ‘non-rational’. Such a component is part and parcel of most ground-breaking theories.
The interest of autobiography is not that it reveals self-knowledge — it does not.
References
Andresen, Julie T.
1991 “Skinner and Chomsky Thirty Years Later”. Historiographia Linguistica 17:1–2.145–165.
Behme, Christina
2014 “A ‘Galilean’ Science of Language”. Journal of Linguistics 50. 671–704.
Bickerton, Derek
1984 “The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:2.173–188.
Boden, Margaret
2006Mind as Machine. A History of Cognitive Science. Volume 1. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1962 “A Transformational Approach to Syntax”. Third Texas Conference on Problems of Linguistic Analysis in English ed. by A. A. Hill, 124–158. Austin: The University of Texas.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1966Cartesian Linguistics. A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam
1975 “Questions of Form and Interpretation”. The Scope of American Linguistics. Papers of the Golden Anniversary Symposium of the Linguistic Society of America, Held at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, on July 24 and 25, 1974 ed. by R. Austerlitz, 159–196. Dordrecht, Boston & London: Kluwer.
Chomsky, Noam
1986Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origins, and Use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam
2012The Science of Language. Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2017 “The Galilean Challenge”. Inference 3:1.1–7.
Chomsky, Noam
2020 “The UCLA Lectures (April 29–May 2, 2019)”. lingbuzz/005485.
Chomsky, Noam
2021 “Linguistics Then and Now: Some personal reflections”. Annual Review of Linguistics 7.1–11.
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro & Rosalind Thornton
2006 “Language Acquisition is Language Change”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:1.31–49.
de Man, Paul
1984 “Autobiography as De-facement”. The Rhetoric of Romanticism, 67–81. New York: Columbia University Press.
Falk, Julia S.
1992 “Otto Jespersen, Leonard Bloomfield, and American Structural Linguistics”. Language 68:3.465–491.
Feyerabend, Paul
1975Against Method. London: Verso.
Jespersen, Otto
1894Progress in Language. With special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
Jespersen, Otto
1909 “Origin of Linguistic Species”. Scientia 6.111–120.
Jespersen, Otto
1922Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Development. London: Allen & Unwin.
Jespersen, Otto
1924The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Kertész, András
2012 “The ‘Galilean Style in Science’ and the Inconsistency of Linguistic Theorizing”. Foundations of Science 17.91–108.
Kibbee, Douglas A.
(ed.)2010Chomskyan (R)evolutions. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1972 “Towards a Historiography of Linguistics 19th and 20th Paradigms”. Anthropological Linguistics 14:7.255–280.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1989 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography. Observations of a bystander”. Practicing Linguistic Historiography by E. F. K. Korner, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
2004 “Linguistics and Revolution with Particular Reference to the Chomskyan Revolution”. Language and Revolution / Language and Time ed. by F. Brisard, S. d’Hondt & T. Mortelmans, 3–62. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Mackert, Michael
1993 “Interpretation, Authorial Intention, and Representation: Reflections on the Historiography of Linguistics”. Language Sciences 15:1.39–52.
McCawley, James
1999 “The Biological Side of Otto Jespersen’s Linguistic Thought”. Historiographia Linguistica 19:1.97–110.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1986The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014Getting the Word Out: The early generativists’ multipronged efforts to diffuse their ideas. Language 90:1.241–268.
Nielsen, Janet
2010Private Knowledge, Public Tensions: Theory commitment in postwar American linguistics. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
Riemer, Nick
2009 “Grammaticality as Evidence and as a Prediction in Galilean Linguistics”. Language Sciences 31.612–633.
Stuurman, Frits
1987 “On Chomsky and Jespersen: two approaches to grammar”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987 ed. by Frits Beukema & Peter Coopmans, 205–211. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.
Thomas, Margaret
2020 “On the Reception and Revivification of Cartesian linguistics”. History of Linguistics 2007. Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHOLS 14), Paris, 28 August-1 September ed. by Émilie Aussant and Jean-Michel Fortis, 157–169. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.