Book review
Formalism and Functionalism in Linguistics. The Engineer and the Collector. By Margaret Thomas.
New York and London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2020. 118 pp. ISBN 13: 978-0-367-78784-4 22,95 US$

Reviewed by Peter Harder
Publication history
Table of contents

This is a book that tries to improve understanding between two competing approaches to the study of language, and as such it deserves the sympathy of the linguistic public. It offers a guided tour of the linguistic zoo, as it were – a brief overview of salient characteristics of (selected varieties of) formal and functional linguistics. The book will appeal to students of neighbouring fields, including students of different languages – or people who have heard about linguistics and would like to know a little about the main approaches to the study of language.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney
1987Competition, Variation, and Language Learning. Mechanisms of language acquisition ed. by Brian MacWhinney, 157–193. Hillsdale: NY. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1989Functionalism and the Competition Model. The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing ed. by Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates. 3–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2008On Iconicity of Distance. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1.49–57. ( DOI logo).Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
ed. 1985Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008In Defence of Iconicity. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1.35–48. ( DOI logo)Google Scholar
Hajičová, Eva
1994Topic/Focus and Related Research. The Prague School of Structural and Functional Linguistics: A short introduction ed. by Philip A. Luelsdorff, 245–275. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Peter
2013Structure and Function: A niche-constructional approach. Functional Approaches to Language edited by Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany, 71–106. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2008Frequency vs. Iconicity in Explaining Grammatical Asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1.1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina
1999Underspecification and Modularity in Early Syntax: A formalist perspective on early acquisition. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics ed. by Edith Moravcsik, Michael Darnell, Frederick Newmeyer, Michael Noonan & Kathleen Wheatley, Vol. I, 387–413. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibbotson, Paul & Michael Tomasello
2016Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s Theory of Language Learning. Scientific American 315. Available at: http://​www​.scientificamerican​.com​/article​/evidence​-rebuts​-chomsky​-s​-theory​-of​-language​-learning/
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language. A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar