Book review
Group Formation in Social Science. By Stephen O. Murray.
Edmonton, Alta: Linguistic Research, Inc., 1983. xxvi, 519 pp.

Reviewed by M. L. Dillinger
McGill University
Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Bunge, Mario
1983 Treatise in Basic Philosophy. Vol. 6: Understanding in the world. (= Epistemology and Methodology, 2.) Dordrecht, & Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
1984 “Philosophical Problems in Linguistics”. Erkenntnis 21.107–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffith, Belver C. & Nicholas Mullins
1972 “Invisible colleges: Small, coherent groups may be the same throughout science”. Science 177.959–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell & John Fought
1975 “American structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics. ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, Vol.13, part 2: Historiography of Linguistics, 903–1156. The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted in book form, ibid. 1981.)Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1983 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and its Historiography: A few critical remarks”. Language & Communication 3:2.147–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas
1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd enl. ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry
1977 Progress and its Problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980 “Gatekeepers and the ‘Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16.73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Review of Newmeyer (1980) HL 8.107–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982 “The Reviewer Responds”. HL 9.187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1980 Linguistic Theory in America: The first quarter century of transformational generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1982 “Reply to Murray’s Review”. HL 9.185–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Bruce L.
1977 “Paradigms and Revolutions in Linguistics”. The Fourth LACUS Forum ed. by Michel Paradis, 384–90. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
1976 “The Applicability of Kuhn’s Paradigms to the History of Linguistics”. Lg 52.285–94.Google Scholar