Also Ran: Some rivals of Herder in the Berlin Academy’s 1770 essay competition on the Origin of Language

Paul B. Salmon
Oxford
Summary

Johann Gottfried Herder’s (1744–1803) Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache was published in 1772 after winning a prize competition instituted by the Berlin Academy of Sciences for an essay to determine whether or how man, left to his own devices, could devise language for himself. The work was hastily written in the last weeks of 1770 in order to meet the closing date, and its diction and form bear the marks of hurried composition. Alhough it is generally considered to be a seminal work on its subject, it is anything but academic, and some critics have even gone so far as to regard it as a lampoon at the expense of the Academy by showing its question to be a ‘non-question’. At all events, the argumentation of the Abhandlung is not without its weak points; and it is interesting in this light to examine the work of others of the 30 entrants to the competition, who published their essays anonymously about the time when Herder’s work appeared, or a little later.

The present paper traces the main lines of the arguments of three of these essays; and it emerges that Herder’s was not the only one to establish the importance of the distinctive feature (Merkmal) in identifying an object. The more cautious contestants, however, looked upon the Merkmal as an indispensable first step in creating a name; this in turn was to become an initial stage in language. They portrayed the origin of language as a continuous process rather than a sudden discovery by emphasizing the progressive development of abstraction or by examining the means by which the association between words and objects was established within communities. Herder’s rivals, however, do not take account of views expressed before their time, as Herder does in the prize-winning essay, nor do they stress, as he does, that language is necessarily a product of human ingenuity. Nevertheless, Herder was not the only competitor to make an original and positive contribution to the debate, and the essays examined here, too, throw valuable light on a problem which exercised scholars in the 18th century, and in which the 20th has shown renewed interest in the light of enhanced knowledge of linguistics, physiology and ethology.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aarsleff, Hans
1974 “The tradition of Condillac: the problem of the origin of language in the eighteenth century and the debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder”. Studies in the History of Linguistics ed. by Dell Hymes. 91–156. (Repr. in Hans Aarsleff. From Locke to Saussure, 146–209. London: Athlone Press 1982 [Passage cited on pp. 197–198].)Google Scholar
Arens, Hans
1969Sprachwissenschaft. Zweite, durchgesehene und stark erweiterte Auflage. Freiburg & Munich: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah
1976Vico and Herder. Two Studies in the History of Ideas. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert T.
1955Herder. His Life and Thought. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Condillac, Étienne Bonnot de
(1715–1780). 1746Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines. (Cited from edition of Œuvres philosophiques , ed. by Georges Le Roy, vol. I [of three]. Paris: Presses universitaires de France 1947.)Google Scholar
[Copineau, Abbé]
1774Essai synthétique sur l’origine et la formation des langues. Paris: Ruault.Google Scholar
Formey, [Johann Heinrich Samuel
(1711–1797)]. 1766 “Réunion des principaux moyens employés pour découvrir l’origine du langage, des idées et des connoissances de l’homme”. Histoire de l’académie royale des sciences et belles-letres (= Classe de philosophie spéculative; Mémoires, Année MDCCLIX), 367–377. Berlin.Google Scholar
[
Füchsel, Georg Christian (1722–1773)]. 1773Entwurf zu der ältesten Erd-und Menschengeschichte, nebst einem Versuch, den Ursprung ‘der Sprache zu finden. Frankfurt & Leipzig: [publisher unstated].Google Scholar
Green, R[ichard]. F.
1961The Progress of Theories on Language, its origin and its place in human activity, among 18th century German writers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg
(1730–1788). 1951 [1772a]Zwo Recensionen, nebst einer Beylage, betreffend den Ursprung der Sprache, s.l. ‘Bey Dodsley und Compagnie’ [Königsberg: Kanter]. Sämtliche Werke. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe ed. by Josef Nadler, vol. III, 15–24. Vienna: Herder-Verlag. [Contains (i) review of Tiedemann (1772), reprinted from Königsbergische gelehrte und politische Zeitungen of 27 December 1771; (ii) review of Herder (1772), reprinted from the same journal, 30 March 1772; and (iii) “Abfertigung der im sechs und zwanzigsten Stück enthaltenen Recension” (i.e. the Herder review).]Google Scholar
(1730–1788). 1951 [1772b]Des Ritters von Rosencreuz letzte Willensmeynung über den göttlichen und menschlichen Ursprung der Sprache. [Königsberg: Kanter]. Sämtliche Werke (as above), vol. III, 25–33.Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolf
(1821–1894). 1958 [1877–85]Herder. 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried
(1744–1803). 1772Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache, welche den von der Königl. Academie der Wissenschaften für das Jahr 1770 gesetzten Preis erhalten hat. Berlin: Friedrich Voss.Google Scholar
Jerusalem, Karl Wilhelm
(1747–1772). 1776Philosophische Aufsätze. Herausgegeben von Gotthold Ephrtaim Lessing. Braunschweig: Buchhandlung des fürstlichen Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Leakey, Richard E. & Roger Lewin
1982. [1977]Origins. London & Sydney: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Philippe Louis Moreau de
(1698–1759). 1748Réflexions philosophiques sur l’origine des langues, et la signification des mots. (Edition of 10 copies; repr. inŒuvres , Nouvelle édition, vol. I. Lyon: Jean-Marie Bruyset 1768.)Google Scholar
(1698–1759). 1756 “Dissertation sur les différents moyens dont les hommes ne sont servis pour exprimer leurs idées”. Histoire de l’académie royale des sciences & belles-lettres (= Classe de philosophie spéculative; Mémoires, Année MDCCLIV), 349–364. Berlin.Google Scholar
Megill, Allan Dickson
1975 “The enlightenment debate on the origin of language and its historical background”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univ. (1974) (DAI 36:1728-a; Order no. 75/18418).Google Scholar
Reimarus, Hermann Samuel
(1694–1768). 1798 [1760]Allgemeine Betrachtungen über die Triebe der Thiere. [Fourth edition]. Aufs neue durchgesehen, mit Anmerkungen und mit einer Einleitung vermehrt durch Joh. Alb. Hinrich Reimarus. Hamburg: Carl Ernst Bohn. [The Introduction to this edition notes (p. 4) Herder’s extension of Reimarus’ theory.]Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
(1712–1788). 1755Discours sur Vorigine et les fondemens de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. (Cited after Œuvres complètes , ed. by Jean Starobinski, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard 1966.)Google Scholar
Stam, James H.
1976Inquieries into the Origin of Language. The fate of a question. New York & London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann
(1823–1899). 1888Der Ursprung der Sprache im Zusammenhang mit den letzten Fragen alles Wissens. Vierte, abermals erweiterte Auflage. Berlin: F. Dümmler.Google Scholar
Süssmilch, Johann Peter
(1708–1767). 1766Versuch eines Beweises, daß die erste Sprache ihren Ursprung nicht vom Menschen, sondern allein vom Schöpfer erhalten habe. Berlin: Buchladen der Realschule.Google Scholar
[
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus (1737–1807)]. 1772Ueber den Ursprung der Sprachen und der Schrift. Bützow & Wismar: Berger- und Boednerschen Buchhandlung. (Re-ed., with an introd. by Hannelore Pallus, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag 1966.)Google Scholar
[
Tetens, Johann Nikolaus (1737–1807)]. 1777Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung. 2 vols. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erben & Rich.Google Scholar
[
Tiedemann, Dieterich (1748–1803)] 1772Versuch einer Erklärung des Ursprunges der Sprache. Riga: Hartknoch. (Repr., Hildesheim: H. A. Gerstenberg 1978.)Google Scholar
[
Tiedemann, Dieterich (1748–1803)]. 1787 “Gedanken über die Entwickelung der Seelenfähigkeiten bei Kindern”. Hessische Beiträge zur Gelehrsamkeit und Kunst 2.313–333 and 486–502. (English translation by Carl Murchison and Suzanne Langer, “Tiedemann’s observations on the development of the mental faculties of children”, The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 34.204–230 (1927).Google Scholar
Übele W.
1905 “Herder und Tetens”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 18.216–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, G[eorge] A[lbert]
1987The Origin of Language. Aspects of the discussion from Condillac to Wundt. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
1988 “Language and the Thinking Process: Dietrich Tiedemann’s eighteenth-century study”. Quinquereme 11.71–86.Google Scholar