Review article
History of Linguistics in the Classical Period The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period. ed. by Daniel J. Taylor.
Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1987. xii, 298 pp. .

Fred W. Householder
Indiana University
Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Apollonius Dyscolus
. Apollonii Dyscoli quae super sunt. 3 vols. Ed. by Richard Schneider & Gustav Uhlig. (= Grammatici Graeci II:1–2.) Leipzig: Teubner 1878–1910 (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1965.)Google Scholar
Austin, J(ohn) L(angshaw
1911–1960). 1965 How to do Things with Words. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Barwick, Karl
1922 Remmius Palaemon und die römische ars grammatica. (= Philologus Supplementband 15.2.) Leipzig: Dieterich. (Repr., Hildesheim: Olms 1967.)Google Scholar
Blank, David L.
1982 Ancient Philosophy and Grammar, the syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= American Philological Association; American Classical Studies, 10.) Chico, California: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1964 “A Three-Level Approach to Syntax”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1.225–40.Google Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise
1983 “Le schéma ‘addition, soustraction, mutation, métathèse’ dans les textes anciens”. Histoire – Epistémologie – Langage 5.23–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, Vincenzo
1958–59 “Dionisio Trace e la techne a lui attribuita”. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, ser. II, 27.169–210 and 28.87–118.Google Scholar
Egli, Urs
1970 Zwei Aufsätze zum Vergleich der stoischen Sprachtheorie mit modernen Theorien. (= Arbeitspapier Nr. 2.) Bern: Universität Bern, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1966 “Non-Thematic Subjects in Contemporary English”. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 2.239–256.Google Scholar
Goetz, Georg & Friedrich Schoell
eds. 1910 M. Terentii Varronis De Lingua Latina quae supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Householder, Fred W.
1976 Review of Taylor (1975) HL 3.252–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 The Syntax of Apollonius Dyscolus (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 23.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. Alan
1980 Transl. of Dionysius Thrax – Technē Grammatikē. Work in Progress No.13, ed. by J. A. Kemp, J. Miller & Elizabeth Uldall. Edinburgh: Department of Linguistics, Edinburgh Univ.Google Scholar
Robins, Robert H.
1974 “The Case Theory of Maximus Planudes”. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguists ed. Luigi Heilman, vol.1, 107–110. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, Dirk M.
1984 “Stoic and Peripatetic Kinds of Speech Act and the Distinction of Grammatical Moods”. Mnemosyne 37 (= Studies in the History of Ancient Linguistics, 2), 291–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J.
1975 Declinado: A study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro (= Studies in the History of Linguistics, 2.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wouters, Alfons
1979 The Grammatical Papyri from Graeco-Roman Egypt: Contributions to the study of the ‘ars grammatica’ in antiquity. (= Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letter en en Schone Kunsten van België; Klasse der Letteren XLI, 92.) Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar