Book review
Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald & Linda F. Wiener.
Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1987. xiii, 286 pp.

Reviewed by Jindřich Toman
University of Michigan
Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Anton, Karl Gottlob
1783 Erste Linien eines Versuchs über der Alten Slawen Ursprung, Sitten, Gebräuche, Meinungen und Kenntnisse. Zweiter Theil. Leipzig: A. F. Böhme. (2nd, rev. ed. 1789.)Google Scholar
Frankenheim, Moritz Ludwig
1852 Völkerkunde: Charakteristik und Physiologie der Völker. Breslau: Trewendt & Granier.Google Scholar
Gruber, Howard E.
1972. “Darwin’s Tree of Nature’ and Other Images of Wider Scope”. On Aesthetics in Science ed. by Judith Wechsler, 121–140. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary B.
1963 Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Holm, Gösta
1972 “Carl Johan Schlyter and Textual Scholarship”. Saga och Sed: Kungliga Gustav Adolf Akademiens Aarbok, 48–80. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald
1973 Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1981 “Schleichers Einfluß auf Haeckel: Schlaglichter auf die wechselseitige Abhängigkeit zwischen linguistischen und biologischen Theorien im 19. Jahrhundert”. KZ 95.1–21. (Repr. in Koerner, Practicing Linguistic Historiography: Selected essays, 211–231. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
Priestly, Tom M. S.
1975 “Schleicher, Čelakovský, and the Family Tree Diagram”. HL 2.299–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar