Skinner and Chomsky thirty years later

Julie T. Andresen
Duke University
Summary

This paper offers a historiographie account of the fate of B. F. Skinner’s famous 1957 book Verbal Behavior and N. Chomsky’s more-famous review of it that appeared in Language in 1959. For the period from the late 1950s, four reasons are identified to explain the repression of Skinner’s behaviorist approach to language with respect to Chomsky an generativism: (i) cognitive taste; (ii) the legacy of the 1960s; (iii) the power of essentializing humanism, and (iv) the discipline of linguistics as it conceived of itself through its textual tradition. The paper argues, furthermore, that changes in the same four categories have provided a more positive climate for behaviorism in the late 1980s. As a result of these recent changes, the paper proposes that Skinner’s place in the historical record of linguistics be reconsidered, along with that of V. N. Vološinov whose approach to language is favorably compared to Skinner’s.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Andresen, Julie
1988 Review of Paul Friedrich, The Language Parallax: Linguistic relativism and poetic indeterminacy (1986) Language in Society 17:4.600–604.Google Scholar
1990 Linguistics in America 1769–1924: A critical history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langham
(1911–1960). 1975 [1962] How To Do Things With Words. 2nd. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, T. H.
1967 “Signals and Neuronal Coding”. The Neurosciences: A study program ed. by Gardner Q. Quarton, Theodore Melnechuck, Francis O. Schmitt, and the associate and staff of the Neurosciences Research Program, 347–352. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jeremy
1989 The Improbable Machine: What the upheavals in artificial intelligence research reveal about how the mind really works. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Chase, Philip & Linda Parrott
eds. 1986 Psychological Aspects of Language: The West Virginia Lectures. Springfield, I11: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1959 Review of Skinner (1957). Language 35:26–58. (Repr. with introduction in Readings in the Psychology of Language ed. by Leon A. Jakobovits & Murray Miron, 142–171. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall 1967.)Google Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
1971 “The Case against B. F. Skinner”. Review of Beyond Freedom and Dignity by B. F. Skinner (New York: A. A. Knopf 1971) The New York Review of Books 17:18–24.Google Scholar
1980 Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin and use. New York-Westport-London: Praeger.Google Scholar
1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass. & London: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert & Stuart Dreyfus
1988 “Making a Mind versus Modeling the Brain: Artifical intelligence back at a branchpoint”. Daedalus 117:1.15–43.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald
1987 Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gleick, James
1987 Chaos: Making a new science. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1988 “Emergent Grammar and the A Priori Grammar Postulate”. Linguistics in Context: Connecting observation and understanding. Lectures from the 1985 LSA/TESOL and NEH Institutes ed. by Deborah Tannen, 117–134. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. Konrad
1983 “The Chomskyan ‘Revolution’ and Its Historiography”. Language & Communication 3.147–169. (Rev. and extended version in Practicing Linguistic Historiography by K. Koerner, 101–146. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1989.)Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian & Jared Leinbach
1989 “Language Learning: Cues or rules?” Journal of Memory and Language 28.255–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marr, David
1982 Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. & Joseph Emonds
1971 “The Linguist in American Society”. Papers from the Seventh Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 285–303. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Papert, Seymour
1988 “One AI or Many?” Daedalus 117:1.1–14.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. & Alan Prince
1988 “On Language and Connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition”. Cognition 28.73–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeke, George & Gerald Edelman
1988 “Real Brains and Artifical Intelligence”. Daedalus 117:1.143–173.Google Scholar
Rosenfield, Israel
1988 The Invention of Memory: A new view of the brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David & James McClelland
& the PDP Research Group 1986 Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B(urrhus) F(rederic
b.1904). 1938 Behavior of Organisms. New York & London: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
b.1904). 1957 Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
b.1904). 1966 “The Phylogeny and Ontogeny of Behavior”. Science 153.1205–1213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
b.1904). 1972 “A Lecture on ‘Having’ a Poem”. Cumulative Record: A selection of papers by B. F. Skinner, 3rd ed., 345–355. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
b.1904). 1981 “Selection by Consequences”. Science 213.501–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein
1957 “An New Anatomy of Language”. Unpublished manuscript review of Skinner (1957).Google Scholar
Tikhomirov, O. K.
1959 Review of Skinner (1957). Word 15.362–367.Google Scholar
Vargas, E. A.
1986 “Intraverbal Behavior”. Chase & Parrott 1986.128–151.Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N.
1973 [1929] Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Transl, by Ladislav Matejka & I. R. Titunik. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar