Rhetoric as a methodological basis for 17th-century linguistics: A Danish case study

Wenche Vagle
Oslo University
Summary

The purpose of this paper is to throw light on the role of rhetoric as a methodological basis for 17th-century linguistics through a Danish case study. After a presentation of the Danish grammarian Peder Syv (16311702) and the main ideas of his text Nogle Betenkninger om det Cimbriske Sprog (Some Reflections on the Cimbric Language), of 1663, a brief characterization of the rhetorical tradition is given with special emphasis on invention and its topical method of inquiry. Through an analysis of the argumentation in Syv’s text it is found that the author employs topic inquiry as his fundamental method of investigation, and that his line of argument relies on rhetorical evidence of all three kinds: ethos, pathos, and logos. In conclusion, it is suggested that the sociological theory of rationalization offers an explanation as to why we as modern readers have difficulties appreciating the rhetorical method.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Becanus, Johannes Goropius (= Jan van Gorp)
1569 Origines Antwerpianœ; sive Cimmeriorum Becceselan novem libros complexa: Atuatica, Gigantomachia, Niloscopium, Cronia, Indoscythica, Saxonica, Gotodanica, Amazonica, Venetica et hyperborea. Antwerp: C. Plantin.Google Scholar
Dixon, Peter
1980 [1961] Rhetoric. London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fafner, Jørgen
1982 Tanke og tale: Den retoriske tradition i Vesteuropa. København: Reitzel.Google Scholar
Fossestøl, Bernt
1984 “Om urspråk, universalgrammatikk og morsmål”. Festskrift til Einar Lundeby ed. by Bernt Fossestøl, Kjell Ivar Vannebo, Kjell Venås & Finn-Erik Vinje, 17–36. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Golden, James L., Goodwin F. Berquist & William E. Coleman
eds. 1983 The Rhetoric of Western Thought. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall & Hunt.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1984 [1981] The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol.I: Reason and the rationalization of society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, Even
1982 “Norsk språk i europeisk lingvistikk i det 16. og 17. århundre”. Maal og minne 1–2/1982:49–69.Google Scholar
1987 “The First Vernacular Grammars in Europe: The Scandinavian area”. Histoire épistémologie langage 9:73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A.
1980 Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Nafstad, Petter
1983 Sosialfilosofi. Lillehammer: Oppland College.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1982 Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London & New York: Methuen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pontoppidan, Erik
1668 Grammatica Danica. København: Typis Christiani Veringii Acad. Typogr.Google Scholar
Rosted, Jakob
1810 Forsøg til en Rhetoric. Christiania: Author (Republished in Jon Hellesnes, “Jakob Rosted og retorikken”, Basar 4/1980:40–49.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Peter
1982 Untersuchungen zur Historiographie der Linguistik. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Syv, Peder
1663 Nogle betenkninger om det Cimbriske Sprog. København. (Repr. in Danske Grammatikere fra Midten af det syttende til Midten af det attende Aarhundrede ed. by Henrik Bertelsen, vol.I, 87–115. København: Gyldendalske boghandel, Nordisk Forlag 1915.)Google Scholar