The first quarter century of the Linguistic Society of America, 19240–1949

Stephen O. Murray
El Institute Obregón, San Francisco
Summary

The Linguistic Society of America was founded in 1925 by scholars trained in traditional philological methods but more interested in building a science of linguistics than in literary studies. Language, the official journal of the new society became an organ for structural descriptions of sound systems of diverse languages. The Linguistic Institute, a summer training program, speeded diffusion of the new structuralist methods. Focus on native speech rather than on literary texts was a hallmark of the ‘application’ of structuralist linguistics to the teaching of languages in military intensive language programs during the Second World War, and in some academic programs (notably at Cornell University) after the war. After the war Language expanded, and a number of other linguistics journals began publishing. The extent to which these other journals were complements and the extent to which they were rivals remains controversial. Patterns of publications follow lines of theoretical divergence within what is sometimes mistakenly regarded as a neo-Bloomfieldian monolith. It is argued that the self-annuling prestige of the linguistic analyst in the process of language learning contributed to the difficulty of establishing a profession based on ‘the science of language’ in the late 1940s and through the 1950s. The analytical role of native speakers in the Bloomfieldian tradition is contrasted with that in the Sapirian tradition.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Akhmanova, Ol’ga S. & Galina Milkael’an
1969The Theory of Syntax in Modern Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Andrade, Manuel J.
1936 “Some Questions of Fact and Policy Concerning Phonemes”. Language 12.1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1985Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of rules and theories of representations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1943 “The Phonemes of the Tokyo Dialect of Japanese”. Le Maître Phonétique 21.1–5.Google Scholar
1945 “Publications Committee Report”. LSA Bulletin 18.11–15.Google Scholar
1946 “Studies in Colloquial Japanese II: Syntax”. Language 22. 200–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1950a “Studies in Colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics”. Language 28.86–125. (Repr. in Joos 1957:329–348.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1950b “Publications Committee Report”. LSA Bulletin 23.12–17.Google Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. & George L. Trager
1941 “The Syllabic Phonemes of English”. Language 17.223–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard. [and Leonard Bloomfield
] 1942Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1914An Introduction to the Study of Language. New York: H. Holt & Co. (Repr., with an introd. by Joseph F. Kess, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1983.)Google Scholar
1923First German Book. Columbus: R. G. Adams & Co.Google Scholar
1925a “On the Sound System of Central Algonquian”. Language 1.130–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1925b “Why a Linguistic Society?”. Language 1.1–5. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:63–65.)Google Scholar
1926 “A Set of Postulates for the Study of Language”. Language 2.153–164. (Repr. in Joos 1957:26–31, and in Hockett 1987:110–127.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1927 “On Recent work in General Linguistics”. Modern Philology 25.211–230. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:134–135.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1928 “A Note on Linguistic Change”. Language 4.99–100. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:134–135.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1933Language. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
1938 “Eduard Prokosch, 1876–1938”. Language 14.310–313. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:239–242.)Google Scholar
1942aOutline Guide for the Practical Study of Foreign Languages. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
1942b “Linguistics and Reading”. Elementary English Review 19. 125–130. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:255–266.)Google Scholar
1942c “Ilocano Syntax”. Language 18.193–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1943 “Meaning”. Montatshefte für deutschen Untericht 35.101–106. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:271–276.)Google Scholar
1944 “Secondary and Tertiary Responses to Language”. Language 20.45–55. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:284–296.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1945 “About Foreign Language Teaching”. Yale Review 34.625–641. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:297–309.)Google Scholar
1946 “Twenty-One Years of the Linguistic Society”. Language 22. 1–3. (Repr. in Hockett 1987:311–314.)Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. & Clarence L. Barnhart
1961Let’s Read. Detroit: Wayne State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1911 “Introduction”. Handbook of American Indian Languages, vol.1, 1–83. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of American Ethnology. (Repr., Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press 1966.)Google Scholar
Bolling, George Melville
1937 “Statistics of the Homeric Language and a Queer Bit of Criticism”. Language 13.238–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bright, William O.
1980 “American Linguistics: A Western view”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 123–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John B.
ed. 1956Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf Cambridge, Mass.: Technologist Press.Google Scholar
Chao Yuen-Ren
1934 “The Non-Uniqueness of Phonemic Solutions of Phonetic Systems”. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology of the Academic Sinica 4.363–97. (Repr. in Joos 1957:38–54.)Google Scholar
1977Chinese Linguist, Phonologist, Composer and Author. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office (Bancroft Library, Univ. of California).Google Scholar
Collitz, Hermann
1925The Scope and Aim of Linguistic Science”. Language 1.14–16.Google Scholar
Cowan, J Milton
1975 “Peace and War”. LSA Bulletin 48.28–38. (Revised version published in First Person Singular II: Autobiograophies by North American scholars in the language sciences ed. by Konrad Koerner, 69–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1991.)Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna D.
1969The Development of American Anthropology, 1880–1920. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1990Edward Sapir, Linguist, Anthropologist, Humanist. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Esper, Erwin A.
1968Mentalism and Objectivism in Linguistics: The sources of Leonard Bloomfield’s psychology of language. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Espinosa, Aurelio M.
1923–1927Cuentos populares españoles. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1925 “Syllabic Consonants in New Mexico Spanish”. Language 1.109–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1927–1928 “The Language of Cuentos populares españoles ”. Language 3.188–198, 4.18–22, 111–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Catherine S.
& Don D. Fowler 1986 “Edward Sapir, Tony Tillohash and Southern Paiute Studies”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 41–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freidson, Eliot
1970Profession of Medicine. New York: Dodd & Mead.Google Scholar
1986Professional Powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C.
1940aAmerican English Grammar: The grammatical structure of present-day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects. New York: Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
1940b “Report on Responses to Linguistic Institute Questionnaires”. LSA Bulletin 13.89–101.Google Scholar
1963 “The Bloomfield School”. Trends in American and European Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfeit & Joshua Whatmough, 196–224. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Graves, Mortimer, & J. M[ilton] Cowan
1942Report of the First Year’s Operation of the Intensive Language Program of the American Council of Learned Societies. Washington: ACLS.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R.
1943 “The Linguist as a Teacher of Language”. Language 19.203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1953 “The Application of Linguistics to Language Teaching”. Anthropology Today ed. by Alfred L. Kroeber, 807–818. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1978 interview by the author 26 July 1978.Google Scholar
1979 Interview by the author 14 February 1979.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A., Jr.
1960Linguistics and Your Language. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
1975Stormy Petrel in Linguistics. Ithaca: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar
1989Modern Language Maverick. Ithaca: Linguistica.Google Scholar
1990aA Life for Language: A biographical memoir of Leonard Bloomfield. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990b Letter to the author 22 February 1990.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1941Review of Trubetzkoy (1935). Language 17.345–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1944 “Yokuts Structure and Newman’s Grammar”. IJAL 10.196–211.Google Scholar
1945 “Navaho Phonology and Hoijer’s Analysis”. IJAL 11.239–246.Google Scholar
1951aMethods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1951bReview of Mandelbaum (1949). Language 27.288–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. New York: Humanities Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973Review of Hockett (1970.) IJAL 39.252–255.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1951 “Directions in Modern Linguistics”. Language 27.211–222. (Repr. in Joos 1957:357–363.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Letter to author 4 April 1979.Google Scholar
Heffner, R[oe]-M[errill] S[ecrist]
1940 “A Note on Vowel Length in General American Speech”. Language 16.33–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, A[rchibald]. A.
1936 “Phonetic and Phonemic Change”. Language 12.15–22. (Repr. in Joos 1957:81–84.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
How Many Revolutions Can a Linguist Live Through?”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain 67 76 Amsterdam John Benjamins
Hockett, Charles F.
1942 “A System of Descriptive Phonology”. Language 18.3–21. (Repr. in Joos 1957:97–108.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1951Review of André Martinet, Phonology as Functional Phonetics (London: Oxford Univ. Press 1949) Language 27.333–342.Google Scholar
1954 “Two Models of Grammatical Description”. Word 10.210–231. (Repr. in Joos 1957:387–399.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1970A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1980 “Preserving the Heritage”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 97–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed. 1987A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Abridged ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1987 “Letters from Bloomfield to Michelson and Sapir”. Leonard Bloomfield: Essays on his life and work ed. by Robert A. Hall, Jr. & Konrad Koerner, 39–60. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 “Leonard Bloomfield: After fifty years”. Yale Graduate Journal of Anthropology 2:1–11.Google Scholar
1990 Letter to the author 26 February 1990.Google Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M.
1964 “George M. Bolling”. Language 40.329–336.Google Scholar
Hughes, Everett C.
1971The Sociological Eye. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H.
1981 “ In Vain I Tried to Tell You ”: Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983Studies in the History of Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. & John Fought
1975 “American Structuralism”. Current Trends in Linguistics 13.903–1156. The Hague: Mouton. (Separate ed., ibid. 1981.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & John Lotz
1950 “Notes on the French Phonemic Pattern”. Word 5.151–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joos, Martin
1940Review of Fries (1940). Language 16.74–75.Google Scholar
1957Readings in Linguistics: The development of descriptive linguistics in America sincel925. Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
1967 “Bernard Bloch”. Language 43.3–19.Google Scholar
1986[1976]Notes on the Development of the Linguistic Society of America, 1924–1950. Ithaca, N.Y.: Linguistica.Google Scholar
Keefer, Louis E.
1988Scholars in Foxholes: The story of the Army Specialized Training Program in World War II. Jefferson, N.C.: Mcfarland.Google Scholar
Kendall, Patricia
1964 “Evaluating an Experimental Program in Medical Education”. Innovation in Education ed. by Mathew B. Miles, 343–360. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Roland Grubb
1932The Sounds of Latin. (= Language Monograph, 12.) Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
1946The Forms of Latin. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
1950Old Persian Grammar, Texts, Lexicon. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K[onrad]
1970 “Bloomfieldian Linguistics and the Problem of Meaning”. Jahrbuch für Amerikastudien 15.162–183. (Repr. in Koerner, Toward a Historiography of Linguistics, 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1978.)Google Scholar
1986 “Aux sources de la sociolinguistique [moderne]”. Lingvisticœ Investigationes 10.381–401. (Repr. in K. Koerner, Saussurean Studies / Etudes saussuriennes, 155–174. Geneva: Slatkine 1988.)Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. & C. Douglas Chrétien
1937 “Quantitative Classifications of Indo-European Languages”. Language 13.83–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L.
1939 “Statistical Techniques and Hittite”. Language 16.69–71. Kroeber, Theodora K. 1970 Alfred Kroeber: A personal configuration. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Krupat, Arnold
1985For Those Who Come After: A study of native American autobiography. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans
1949Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lane, George S.
1954 “Roland Grubb Kent”. Language 29.1–15.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti
1977The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy
1985 “The Committee on Research in Native American Languages”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 129. 129–160.Google Scholar
1990 “Notes in the History of Intercultural Communication: The Foreign Service Institute and the mandate for intercultural training”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 76. 262–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. & James M. Nyce
1986 “Linguistic Text Collection and the Development of Life History in the Work of Edward Sapir”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 495–531. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1980 “Linguistics at Wisconsin and Texas”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 181–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li Fang-Kuei
1988Linguistics, East and West. Berkeley: Regional Oral History Office (Bancroft Library, Univ. of California, Berkely).Google Scholar
Maddox, William P.
1949 “The Institute’s Program of Language Instruction”. American Foreign Service Journal 22.15–55.Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1966 “Bernard Bloch”. Romance Philology 19.648.Google Scholar
1980 “Autobiographic Sketch: Early years in America”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd H. Davis & Raymond K. O’Cain, 79–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, David G.
ed. 1949Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, Personality. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert H.
1968 “Charles C. Fries”. Language 44.205–208.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I. Jr.
1980 “Linguistics, through the Kitchen Door”. First Person Singular ed. by Boyd Davis & Raymond O’Cain, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuown, Norman A.
1953Review of Harris (1951). Language 28.495–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G.
1961 “Linguistics and Language Teaching in the United States”. Trends in American and European Linguistics, 1930–1960 ed. by Christine Mohrmann, Alf Sommerfeit & Joshua Whatmough, 82–109. Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum.Google Scholar
1966 “The Linguistic Society of America, 1924–1966”. Language 42.855–856.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicholas C.
1972 “The Development of a Scientific Specialty: The phage group”. Minerva 10.51–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1979Social Science Networks. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto. (Published as Murray 1983b).Google Scholar
1980 “Gatekeepers and ‘the Chomskian Revolution’”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 16.73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983a “The Creation of Linguistic Structure”. American Anthropologist 85.356–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983bGroup Formation in Social Science. (= Current Inquiry into Language, Linguistics and Human Communications, 44.) Edmonton, Alta.: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
1983b 1984 “Notes on the History of Linguistic Anthropology”. HL 11. 449–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983b. 1989 “Recent Studies of American Linguistics”. HL 16.149–171. Newman, Stanley S. 1946 “On the Stress System of English”. Word 2.171–187.Google Scholar
1983b 1948 “English Suffixation: A descriptive approach”. Word 4.24–36.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A.
1946 “Analysis of Grammatical Constituents”. Language 24.168–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Passin, Herbert
1982Encounter with Japan. Tokyo: Kondasha. Pike, Kenneth L. 1943 “Taxemes and Immediate Constituents”. Language 19.65–82.Google Scholar
1946The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
1947a “Grammatical Prerequisites to Phonemic Analysis”. Word 3. 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947b “Phonemic Status of English Diphthongs”. Language 23. 151–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1948Tone Languages: A technique for determining the number and types of pitch contrasts in a language with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
1949 “Coexistent Phonemic Systems”. Language 25.29–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 “An Autobiographical Note on Phonetics”. Towards a History of Phonetics: In honour of David Abercrombie ed. by Ronald E. Asher & Eugénie Henderson, 181–185. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1989 “Recollections of Bloomfield”. HL 16.217–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasitzke, Harry A.
1939 “Vowel Length in General American Speech”. Language 15.99–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose-Innes, Arthur
1919Conversational Japanese. Yokohama: Kelly & Walsh.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Jerome
1972Shaking the Pumpkin: Traditional poetry of the Indian North Americans. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday. Samarin, William J. 1966 “Self-Annuling Prestige Factors among Speakers of a Creole Language”. Sociolinguistics ed. by William Bright, 188–206. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
1925 “Sound Patterns in Language”. Language 1.37–51. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:33–45, and in Joos 1957:19–25.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1930Totality. (= Language Monograph, 6.) Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1931 “The Concept of Phonetic Law as Tested in Primitive Languages by Leonard Bloomfield”. Methods in Social Science: A case book ed. by Stuart A. Rice, 297–306. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:73–82.)Google Scholar
1933 “La réalité psychologique des phonèmes”. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 30.247–265. [English original first published in Mandelbaum 1949:46–60.]Google Scholar
1938 “Why Cultural Anthropology Needs the Psychiatrist”. Psychiatry 1.7–12. (Repr. in Mandelbaum 1949:569–577). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yao
1962 “Isochronism in English”. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Paper 9. Norman, Okla.Google Scholar
Shohara, Hide H. & Joseph K. Yamagiwa
1966Intermediate Dialogues in Japanese. Ann Arbor: Far East Language Institutes.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1986 “The Diachrony of Sapir’s Synchronic Linguistic Description”. New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality ed. by William Cowan, Michael Foster & Konrad Koerner, 67–109. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Stanley Newman”. Language 63.346–360.Google Scholar
1990 Letter to author 13 February 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry Lee, Jr.
1946 “Language Training for the Foreign Service and the Department of State”. American Foreign Service Journal 23.11–47.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul M.
1983The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H.
1940 “History of the Linguistic Institute”. LSA Bulletin No.13.83–89.Google Scholar
1947 “Linguistics and the American Council of Learned Societies”. Language 23.313–316.Google Scholar
Sullivan, William J.
1985 “Structure and Function in Syntactic Analysis”. Linguistics and Philosophy: Essays in honor of Rulon S. Wells ed. by Adam Makkai & Alan Melby, 205–222. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1934 “The Phonemic Principle”. Language 10.117–229. (Repr. in Joos 1957:32–37.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1935a “The Vowels of Chicago English”. Language 11.148–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1935b “Twaddell on Defining the Phoneme”. Language 11.245–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1937 “The Phonemic Interpretation of Long Consonants”. Language 13. 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947 “On the Analysis of English Syllables”. Language 23.137–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. & C[harles] F. Voegelin
1939 “A Problem in Phonological Alternation”. Language 14.1–10. (Repr. in Joos 1957:88–92.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, Dennis
1972Finding the Center: Narrative poetry of the Zuni Indians. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey
1989 “The Editor’s Department”. Language 65.445–448, 683–684, 919–920.Google Scholar
Trager, George L.
1934 “The Phonemes of Russian”. Language 10.334–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1958Review of Joos (1957). Studies in Linguistics 13.34–36.Google Scholar
Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith, Jr.
1951An Outline of English Structure. (= Studies in Linguistics; Occasional Papers, 3.) Norman, Okla.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S.
1935Anleitung zu phonologischen Beschreibungen. Brno: Internationale Phonologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. Freeman
1935On Defining the Phoneme. (= Language Monograph, 16.) Baltimore: Waverly Press. (Repr. in Joos 1957:55–80.)Google Scholar
1936Reply to Andrade (1936). Language 12.294–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F[rederick]
1935 “Shawnee Phonemes”. Language 11. 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947 “A Problem in Morpheme Alternants”. Language 23.245–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974Review of Esper (1968), Harris (1973), and Hockett (1970). Language Sciences 30.35–38.Google Scholar
Voegelin, C[harles] F[rederick] & F[lorence]. M[argaret] Voegelin
1970 “Our Knowledge of Semantics and How It Is Obtained”. IJAL 36.241–246.Google Scholar
Wells, Rulon S.. III
1945 “Pitch Phonemes of English”. Language 21.27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S. III
1947a “De Saussure’s System of Linguistics”. Word 3.1–31. (Repr. in Joos 1957:1–18.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Rulon S.. III
1947bReview of Pike (1946). Language 23.255–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1945 “Grammatical Categories”. Language 21.1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamagiwa, Joseph K.
1959An Introduction to Japanese Writing. Ann Arbor: G. Walker.Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1937 “Statistical Methods and Dynamic Philology”. Language 13.60–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar