Book review
Their manner of discourse. Nachdenken über Sprache im Umkreis der Royal Society. By Werner Hüllen.
Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1989. xii, 292 pp.

Reviewed by Fredric Dolezal
University of Georgia
Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Aarsleff, Hans, Louis G. Kelly & Hans-Josef Niederehe
eds. 1987 Papers in the History of Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS III), Princeton, 19–23 August 1984. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 38.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolezal, Fredric
1983 The Lexicological and Lexicographical Methods and Procedures of John Wilkins and William Lloyd. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
1986 “How Abstract Is the English Dictionary?”. Hartmann 1986:47–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “John Wilkins and the Development of a Structural Semantics”. Aarsleff, Kelly & Niederehe 1987:271–282.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Reinhard R. K.
ed. 1986 The History of Lexicography: Papers from the Dictionary Research Centre Seminar at Exeter, March 1986. (= Studies in the History of the Language Sciences, 40.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hüllen, Werner
1986 “The Paradigm of John Wilkins’ Thesaurus”. Hartmann 1986.115–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 “Style and Utopia: Sprat’s demand for a plain style, reconsidered”. Aarsleff, Kelly & Niederehe 1987:247–262.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom
1986 “Thematic Lexicography”. Hartmann 1987.157–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subbiondo, Joseph L.
1977 “John Wilkins’ Theory of Meaning and the Development of a Semantic Model”. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa 9:41–61. (Repr. in John Wilkins and 17th-Century British Linguistics ed. by J. L. Subbiondo, 291–308. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1992.)Google Scholar