Sanctius’ Minerva of 1562 and the Evolution of His Linguistic Theory

Manuel Breva-Claramonte
University of Colorado
Summary

The 1587 edition of Sanctius’ Minerva was not the first edition: a 1562 version has recently been discovered. This paper outlines Sanctius’ linguistic theory as it is advanced in the earlier version and traces its evolution. Some aspects of Sanctius’ system are briefly considered with relation to his immediate predecessors Linacre, Scaliger, and Ramus. I attempt to show that the basic tenets of his theory are already present in the early work: his conception of grammar, the importance of his logical rules (rationes), and his abstract notion of ellipsis as an essential mechanism for positing underlying structures and general rules, as well as for explaining obscure syntactic constructions. His views on the noun and the constructio of nouns, on verbs and the constructio of verbs are presented in an effort to show his evolution towards a more simple and general system of language. No attempt is made to cover those aspects of his theory which appear only in the later Minerva.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Barwick, Karl
(b.1883), ed. 1925 Flavii Sosipatri Charisii Artis grammaticae libri V. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. (2nd ed., with corrections by Friedmar Kühnert 1964.)Google Scholar
Bell, Aubrey (Fitz Gerald
1822–1950). 1925 Francisco Sánchez, el Brocense. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press & M. Milford.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E.
ed. 1966 [1676] Grammaire génerale et raisonnée; ou, La Grammaire de Port-Royal. 2 vols. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holz-boog.Google Scholar
Butler, H(arold) E(dgeworth
b. 1878), ed. 1966 The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian. With an E. transl. 2 vols. London: W. Heinemann. (First published in 1921–22.)Google Scholar
Cervanfes, (Saavedra), Miguel de
(1547–1616). 1914 Obras completas: Galatea. 2 vols. Madrid: B. Rodríguez.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude
1968 Histoire de la syntaxe: Naissance de la notion de complément dans la grammaire française (1530–1750). Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Del Estal Fuentes, Eduardo
. Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas: Minerva 1562. (Ph.D. dissertation to appear in Publicaciones de la Universidad de Salamanca. This work will include an annotated edition of the 1562 Minerva.)Google Scholar
Horace (= Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65–8 B.C.)
1966 Satires. Fr. transl. ed. by Paul Lejay. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
1885 Carmina. Ed. by Lucian Müller (1836–98) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1969 Review of Brekle 1966 Lg 45:2.343–64.Google Scholar
Liaño Pacheco, Jesús Marĭa
1971 Sanctius, el Brocense. Madrid: Aldus S.A. (Diss., Univ. of Salamanca 1963.)Google Scholar
Linacre, Thomas
(1460?-1524). 1557 [1524] De emendata structura latini sermonis libri sex. Venice: P. Manuntius. (Also, Paris: C. Wechel 1541.)Google Scholar
Mayans y Siscar, Gregorio
(1699–1781). 1766 Francisci Sanctii Brocensis Opera Omnia. 4 vols. Geneva: Fratres de Tourmes.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1958 Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue; from the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Percival, W. Keith
Forthcoming a. “Deep and Surface Structure Concepts in Renaissance Medieval Syntactic Theory”. History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics ed. by Herman Parret Berlin & New York W. de Gruyter
Forthcoming b. “The Renaissance: The grammatical tradition and the rise of the vernaculars”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok vol. 13 Historiography of Linguistics The Hague Mouton
Quintilian(us), Marcus Fabius
(35-C.95 A.D.). Institutio oratoria, see Butler 1966.Google Scholar
Ramus, Petrus (= Pierre de La Ramée
1515–72). 1581 Scholae in tres primas liberales artes. Frankfort/M.: A. Wechel. (Facs.-repr., Frankfort/M.: Minerva 1965.)Google Scholar
Robins, R. H.
1974 “Theory-Orientation versus Data-Orientation”. HL 1:1.11–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanctius, Franciscus (= Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas
1523–1601). 1562a Institutions. Lyon: S. Gryphius.Google Scholar
1523–1601). 1562b Minerva; seu, De linguae latinae causis et elegantia.. Ibid.Google Scholar
1523–1601). 1587 Minerva; seu. De causis linguae latinae. Salamanca: J. & A. Renaut.Google Scholar
Sandys, Sir John E(dwin
1844–1922). 1903 The History of Classical Scholarship. Vol. I. Cambridge Univ. Press. (3rd ed. 1920; repr. New York: Hafner 1958.)Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo D.
1972 The Classical Theory of Composition, from its origins to the present: A historical survey. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Scaliger, Julius Caesar
(1484–1558). 1584 De causis linguae latinae: Libri tredecim. Heidelberg: P. Santandreamus. (1st ed., Lyon: S. Gryphius 1540.)Google Scholar
Tovar, Antonio, and Miguel de la Pinta Llorente
1941 Procesos inquisitoriales contra Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Inves-tigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar