Theorie Et Histoire De La Linguistique

Raffaela Simone
Université de Salerno
Summary

The history of linguistics is presented as a crucial part of linguistics as a whole, in view of its contribution to the understanding of the logical and cognitive structure and evolution of the linguistic discipline itself. The basis for this view is to be found in Saussure’s distinction between the ‘matter’ and ‘object’ of linguistic science: what changes through time is not merely the object of study, namely, the complex system we call ‘language’, but also its matter, since the evidence we put forward is not simply given per se, but is selected by the investigator in accordance with certain determinants both internal and external to the discipline. Furthermore, this change affects the way in which evidence and theory are linked, i.e., the cognitive procedures leading from the former to the latter, which in turn are influenced by internal and external factors. This thesis is illustrated in a discussion of three crucial chapters in the history of linguistic thinking: Renaissance philosophy of language, Port-Royal linguistic theory, and Saussure.

Quick links
Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References Bibliographiques

Amacker, René
1972 “Le choix des évidences et la formalisation”. Linguistica, semiologia, epistemologia éd. par Anna Ludovico et Ugo Vignuzzi, 1–12. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Apel, Karl Otto
1963 Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico. (= Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 8.) Bonn: H. Bouvier.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1959 “Three Methodological Remarks on Fundamentals of Language [par Roman Jakobson et Morris Halle]”. Word 13.223–35. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:317–28.)Google Scholar
1967 Compte rendu de The Structure of Language éd. par Jerrold J. Katz et Jerry A. Fodor (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall 1964) Lg 43.526–50. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:150–81.)Google Scholar
1969 Compte rendu de Lyons 1968 Semiotica 1.449–59. (Repr. dans Bar-Hillel 1970:364–74.)Google Scholar
1970 Aspects of Language. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1964 “Lettres de F. de Saussure à A. Meillet”. CFS 21.89–130.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933 Language. New York: H. Holt & Co.; Londres: Allen & Unwin 1935.Google Scholar
Burger, André
1961 “Significations et valeur de suffìxe verbal francais -e- ” CFS 18.5–15.Google Scholar
Bursill-Hall, G. L.
1971 Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. La Haye & Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1958 “Beobachtungssprache und theoretische Sprache”. Dia-lectica 12.236–48.Google Scholar
1963 “Carl G. Hempel on Scientific Theories”. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap éd. par Paul Arthur Schilpp, 958–66. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court; Londres: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1966 Cartesian Linguistics: A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York & Londres: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clair, Pierre, et François Girbal
éds. 1965 Antoine Arnauld et Pierre Nicole: La Logique ou l’art de penser. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1952 “Sistema, norma y habla”. Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias (Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo) 9. 113–77.Google Scholar
De Mauro, Tullio
1967 “Notizie biografìche e critiche su F. de Saussure”. Ferdinand de Saussure: Corso di linguistica generale éd. par T. De Mauro, 285–360. Bari: Laterzar (3e éd. 1970.)Google Scholar
De Rijk, Lambertus Marie
1967 Logica modernorum. Vol. II. 1–2. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L.
1973 Transformational Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Donzé, Roland
1967 La Grammaire générale et raisonnée de Port-Royal. Berne: A. Francke. (2e éd. revue 1971.)Google Scholar
Engler, Rudolf
1959 “ CLG und SM: Eine kritische Ausgabe des ‘Cours de linguistique générale’”. Kratylos 4.119–32Google Scholar
1966 “Remarques sur Saussure, son système et sa terminologie”. CFS 22.35–40.Google Scholar
Formigari, Lia
1970 Linguistica ed empirismo nel Seicento inglese. Bari: La-terza.Google Scholar
Frei, Henri
1968 “Syntaxe et méthode en linguistique synchronique”. Enzyklopàdie der geisteswissenschaftlichen Arbeitsmethoden, 4e livraison par Helmut Schnelle et al., 39–63. Munich & Vienne: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Garin, Eugenio
1949 “Umanesimo e Rinascimento”. Questioni di storia della letteratura, 349–404. Milan: Marzorati.Google Scholar
Godel, Robert
1957 Les sources manuscrites du Cours de linguistique générale de F. de Saussure. Genève: Droz; Paris: Minard.(2e tirage 1969.)Google Scholar
1966 “De la théorie du signe aux termes du système”. CFS 22.53–68.Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin
(1875–1949). 1926–56 Mittelalterliches Geistesleben. 3 vols. Munich: M. Hueber.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert, A., Jr.
1936 “Linguistic Theory in Italian Renaissance”. Lg 13.96–107.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G.
1961 La formazione dei concetti e delle teorie nelle scienze empiriche. Trad. ital. par Alberto Pasquinelli. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1968 The State of the Art. La Haye: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.
1973 Ferdinand de Saussure: Origin and development of his linguistic theory in western studies of language. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg. (2e tirage 1974.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koyré, Alexandre
1966a Etudes galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
1966b Etudes d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962 The Structure of Scientifìc Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. (2e éd. augmentée 1970.)Google Scholar
1972 La rivoluzione copernicana. Turin: Einaudi. [Trad. ital. de The Copernican Revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of western thought (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1957).]Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A. A.
éd. 1973 Teoria dell’attività verbale. Bari: Laterza. [Trad. ital. de Teorija rečevoj dejateTnosti (Problemy psixolingvistiki) (Moscou: Izd. “Nauka” 1968).]Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio C.
1974 “Saussure e gli spiriti”. Studi saussuriani per Robert Godel éd. par René Amacker, Luis J. Prieto et Tullio De Mauro, 181–200. Bologne: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968 Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cam-bridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majerù, Alfonso
1972 Terminologia logica della tarda Scolastica. Rome: Edi-zioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean
éd. 1967 Logique et connaissance scientifìque. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Pinborg, Jan
1967 Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster: Aschendorff; Copenhague: Frost-Hansen.Google Scholar
Prieto, Luis J.
1964 Principes de noologie. La Haye: Mouton.Google Scholar
Roos, Heinrich
1959 “Die Stellung der Grammatik im Lehrbetrieb des 13. Jahrhunderts”. Artes liberales: Von der antiken Bildung zur Wissenschaft des Mittelalters éd. par Josef Koch, 94–105. Leyde & Cologne: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Risso, Paolo
1968 “Linguisti d’oggi e fìlosofì del Seicento”. LeSt 3.1–20.Google Scholar
Rotta, Paolo
1909 La filosofia del linguaggio nella Patristica e nella Scolastica. Turin: Bocca.Google Scholar
Sahlin, Gunvor
1928 César Chesneau du Marsais et son rôle dans l’évolution de la grammaire générale. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1931 Cours de linguistique générale. Ed. par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye, avec la collaboration de Albert Riedlinger. 3e éd. Paris: Payot. [Cité sous forme du sigle CLG.]Google Scholar
1967–68 CLG. Edition critique par Rudolf Engler, Tome I. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaele
1969 “Introduzione”. Grammatica e Logica di Port-Royal. Trad. et éd. par R. Simone, vii–1. Rome: Ubaldini.Google Scholar
1970 “Introduzione”. F. de Saussure: Introduzione al secondo corso di linguistica generale (1908–1909) éd. par Robert Godel, trad. ital. par R. Simone, 7–20. Rome: Ubaldini.Google Scholar
1971 “Comunicazione semiotica e comunicazione non-semiotica in Cordemoy”. La Cultura 9.376–91.Google Scholar
1972 “Sémiologie augustinienne”. Semiotica 6.1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann
(1823–99). 1890 Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft beiden Griechen und Römern, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik. 2e éd. revue. Berlin: F. Dümmler. (Repr., Bonn: F. Dümmler 1961.)Google Scholar
Thurot, Charles
(1823–82). 1868 Manuscrits et extraits de divers manuscrits pour servir à l’histoirg des doctrines grammaticales au moyen âge. Paris: Impr. impériale. (Repr., Francfort/M.: Minerva 1964.)Google Scholar
Waterman, John T.
1968 Breve storia della linguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia. [Trad. ital. de Perspectives in Linguistics (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press 1963).]Google Scholar